Jump to content

Thetexashammer

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Thetexashammer

  1. Not just anybody can get into an Extended Stay America.
  2. The AG was reading from the law and applying the facts. The Supreme court did likewise. The treating physician did not certify the medical requirement for the D&C, but that is a requirement, the hospital has a procedure to follow. It was not followed, then somehow an activist lawyer got involved. I assume you read the court's opinion, they seem to indicate, as the AG stated and I said early on, that this never needed to be in a court. I personally think the law is too restrictive.
  3. Ok, maybe. But hear me out. Maybe there is another perspective. It's hard to believe, but just go with it. Suspend your disbelief for a moment. Perhaps, and I know this seems really wild. Perhaps, no no no, I know, just maybe, 100 to 1, but it's possible. Maybe the world's richest man isn't broke.
  4. The AG is not making a factual finding that the procedure is legal. They are stating that the job of making a factual finding is the physician's. They are restating the law. They cannot state "it is legal". That is a factual determination made by the physician. I do apologize for my lack of clarity. To restate my position, there is no reason not to proceed with the procedure, outside of the hospital or the physician refusing to do so. It appears the law is fine, but there is something going on at the hospital. If you want to change the law, this is not the droid you are looking for.
  5. It's not my position that the AG said it is legal. The AG stated that the determination of whether it is legal occurs at the level of the medical provider. That is how the law operates. It is, however, my position you should read what the AG actually said. It appears you have not done that.
  6. The letter says you are allowed to do a D&C if the pregnancy "that places the female at risk of death OR POSES A SERIOUS RISK OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPARATIMENT OF A MAJOR BODILY FUNCTION UNLESS THE ABORTION IS PERFORMED". All the AG did was restate the law. I am not sure what isn't clear about that. She is at risk for uterine rupture. It's entirely clear, medically and morally. That was stated in the Mediaite article. Why is there even a lawsuit? The AG is not contesting the factual finding, just restating the law.
  7. The AG is saying that the procedure is legal, but the hospital is not following their own procedures. All they have to do is follow their existing procedures. The mediaite story claimed the patient was told that she was at risk for uterine rupture which would damage her fertility, so there appears to be no issue with meeting the requirements to make it legal. Is that correct?
  8. He's a politician, so low expectations. They already use the dollar anyway. However, if Argentina switches to Bitcoin, that would be remarkable. Lightning has to get fully developed first. But taking power away from corrupt governments would do wonders for South America.
  9. I did all mil to mil stuff. Here is what Ukraine says they need: Microsoft Power BI Here are delivery locations, with phone numbers: Humanitarian aid website (help.gov.ua) How much money is being spent? I would suggest buying in Poland, stuff is WAY cheaper there. I occasionally bought stuff on Allegro.pl. I could pitch in $500.
  10. It is explained in the press release. The hospital is entitled to follow their long held procedures for making the determination. There is nothing stopping them from performing the procedure tomorrow, other than the hospital's own policies perhaps. It's literally an invitation to perform the procedure.
  11. And I'm not even drinking. Damn. I guess I should start.
  12. Heisman Curse - Activated! But seriously, Penix hasn't met T'Vondre. I do look forward to their introduction.
  13. Paxton alleges that the physician must state that in his or her medical judgment, the facts meet the exception. Paxton made no medical claim at all, and specifically disavows the ability to determine the facts, they merely restate that "reasonable medical judgment" is required. The claim is that she meets the requirement. As far as I can tell, she can get the procedure tomorrow without issue.
  14. They have tons of IFAKs. We made sure they had plenty. I could probably RFI my team for a POC with a charity that is coordinating delivery of material donations to Ukraine. I don't think our activities in Jasionka are classified.
  15. That dude is NOT well spoken.
  16. Can you show me an example of a doctor who has been prosecuted for doing a D&C after a spontaneous abortion? Because I think that would be horrifying.
  17. I really want to know why Magill is smiling the whole time. Either way, these are revolting people. To Anastasis's point, I like freedom of speech so I don't think a chant constitutes "harassment". But the presidents are completely blind to the fact that a large portion of their student body, and even their faculty, supports terrorism. And these assholes aggressively censor speech on a minute to minute basis. Fuck them all, they are evil personified and the enemy of reasoned academic discourse The academy cannot be saved.
×
×
  • Create New...