Jump to content

Refusing to wax a woman's scrotum will get you in trouble


Parliament

Recommended Posts

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/carpay-16-vancouver-women-facing-human-rights-complaints-for-refusing-to-wax-transgender-womans-male-genitalia/

“JY” publicly identifies as a woman, but still has all the male parts.  In recent months, JY approached 16 Vancouver-area female estheticians who only serve women, requesting a “Brazilian” bikini wax on his groin area.

If paying homage to political correctness, one would say that these 16 estheticians will only remove pubic hair from “a woman without a penis.”

Apart from the legitimate choice of a female esthetician to serve only women, there are practical considerations that lead estheticians to provide some services and not all services.

The procedure for providing a man with a “Manzilian” is quite different, using a different kind of wax and a different technique.

Claimant could make $35,000 off the human rights complaints
In spite of the fact that JY is able to obtain a Manzilian in Vancouver, JY has filed 16 complaints against these women at the BC Human Rights Tribunal, claiming discrimination on the basis of “gender identity.”

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clickbait thread title.

 

Lawyer defends his client for free and the frivolous complaint is withdrawn. The other recipients of complaints could also receive similar free services.

 

The article is effectively a public shout out for the 14 potential clients to contact the author to receive free legal services.

 

1 potentially Canadian citizen attempting to abuse their legal system.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, swraith said:

Clickbait thread title.

 

Lawyer defends his client for free and the frivolous complaint is withdrawn. The other recipients of complaints could also receive similar free services.

 

The article is effectively a public shout out for the 14 potential clients to contact the author to receive free legal services.

 

1 potentially Canadian citizen attempting to abuse their legal system.

In other words, yet another stupid, meaningless, drive-by Parliament thread meant to raise the ire of thoughtless "conservatives."

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Parliament said:

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/carpay-16-vancouver-women-facing-human-rights-complaints-for-refusing-to-wax-transgender-womans-male-genitalia/

“JY” publicly identifies as a woman, but still has all the male parts.  In recent months, JY approached 16 Vancouver-area female estheticians who only serve women, requesting a “Brazilian” bikini wax on his groin area.

If paying homage to political correctness, one would say that these 16 estheticians will only remove pubic hair from “a woman without a penis.”

Apart from the legitimate choice of a female esthetician to serve only women, there are practical considerations that lead estheticians to provide some services and not all services.

The procedure for providing a man with a “Manzilian” is quite different, using a different kind of wax and a different technique.

Claimant could make $35,000 off the human rights complaints
In spite of the fact that JY is able to obtain a Manzilian in Vancouver, JY has filed 16 complaints against these women at the BC Human Rights Tribunal, claiming discrimination on the basis of “gender identity.”

Why are you using the term woman you sexist, gender specific recognizing, POS ??!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...