Jump to content

What's going on with this DNI Whistleblower ?


triplehorn

Recommended Posts

I feel bad for the good people of Ukraine. 

Counterpoint -- the fuckholes at the Kiev airport rifled through my daughter's luggage when we transited through there and stole some of her shit.  So, not a lotta kind words for Ukraine in our casa.

Of course, those poor bastards down 5 euro vodka, so....

 

38f235334a3a0ea904b553726599814a.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Pelosi saying the dotard just classfied the WB complaint.  

At first I was going to say "the cover up is worse than the crime," but then I remembered Trump used $400 million of tax payer dollars in an attempt to extort a foreign government into going after one of his political opponents.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Counterpoint -- the fuckholes at the Kiev airport rifled through my daughter's luggage when we transited through there and stole some of her shit.  So, not a lotta kind words for Ukraine in our casa.

Of course, those poor bastards down 5 euro vodka, so....

Nice humblebrag to lord it over those of us perfectly happy to settle for Belarus.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bolverk said:

At first I was going to say "the cover up is worse than the crime," but then I remembered Trump used $400 million of tax payer dollars in an attempt to extort a foreign government into going after one of his political opponents.

Going after his political opponents with pizza-gate level conspiracy nonsense meant to give him fodder to pardon Manafort and Stone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this has all brought an alarming new trend of the phrase "there is no there, there" in some form or another.

dipshit development execs at networks and studios have been using it for a while, instead of using, "we want our show to be about something, and to say something important".  i rarely heard it until a couple days ago, and it's been everywhere today.

not pleased with this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm.  From May 2018:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/world/europe/ukraine-mueller-manafort-missiles.html

 

Quote

In the United States, Paul J. Manafort is facing prosecution on charges of money laundering and financial fraud stemming from his decade of work for a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine.

But in Ukraine, where officials are wary of offending President Trump, four meandering cases that involve Mr. Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, have been effectively frozen by Ukraine’s chief prosecutor.

 

Quote

The cases are just too sensitive for a government deeply reliant on United States financial and military aid, and keenly aware of Mr. Trump’s distaste for the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into possible collusion between Russia and his campaign, some lawmakers say.

The decision to halt the investigations by an anticorruption prosecutor was handed down at a delicate moment for Ukraine, as the Trump administration was finalizing plans to sell the country sophisticated anti-tank missiles, called Javelins.

 

Quote

The State Department issued an export license for the missiles on Dec. 22, and on March 2 the Pentagon announced final approval for the sale of 210 Javelins and 35 launching units. The order to halt investigations into Mr. Manafort came in early April.

Volodymyr Ariev, a member of Parliament who is an ally of President Petro O. Poroshenko, readily acknowledged that the intention in Kiev was to put investigations into Mr. Manafort’s activities “in the long-term box.”

 

 

Spoiler

“In every possible way, we will avoid irritating the top American officials,” Mr. Ariev said in an interview. “We shouldn’t spoil relations with the administration.”

The Ukrainian investigators had been tracing money paid to Mr. Manafort and a New York law firm, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, by figures in the political party of Viktor F. Yanukovych, the Russian-leaning Ukrainian president who was ousted by street protesters and fled the country in 2014. Mr. Manafort was a longtime adviser to Mr. Yanukovych, working with him to revamp his public image and acquire a pro-Western patina that helped him win the presidency in 2010.

The new government established a special prosecutor to pursue corruption in the former administration. By late last year, the prosecutor, Serhiy Horbatyuk, had opened about 3,000 cases, including four related to Mr. Manafort’s consulting for the former president and his political party.

The order issued in April isolated these four investigations. The cases were not closed, the prosecutor general’s office said in a statement, but the order blocked Mr. Horbatyuk from issuing subpoenas for evidence or interviewing witnesses.

“We have no authority to continue our investigation,” Mr. Horbatyuk said in an interview.

One inquiry dealt with possible money laundering in a single $750,000 payment to Mr. Manafort from a Ukrainian shell company. The payment formed one part of the multimillion dollar transfers to Mr. Manafort from politicians in Ukraine that underpin indictments filed by Mr. Mueller in federal court in Washington and Virginia. Before the case was frozen, prosecutors had subpoenaed records from Ukrainian banks.

Another concerned a former chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament’s foreign relations committee, Vitaly Kalyuzhny, who had signed nine of 22 entries designated for Mr. Manafort in a secret ledger of political payoffs uncovered after the 2014 revolution. The ledger showed payouts totaling $12.5 million for Mr. Manafort.

The handwritten accounting document, called in Ukraine the Black Ledger, is an evidential linchpin for investigating corruption in the former government. Mr. Manafort denied receiving under-the-table payments from the party and his spokesman said the ledger might be a forgery.

The other two cases looked at Skadden Arps, which wrote a report with Mr. Manafort’s participation that was widely seen as whitewashing the politically motivated arrest and imprisonment of Mr. Yanukovych’s principal rival, Yulia V. Tymoshenko.

Two months before Ukraine’s government froze the cases, Mr. Horbatyuk reached out to Mr. Mueller’s office with a formal offer to cooperate by sharing evidence and leads. Mr. Horbatyuk said that he sent a letter in January and did not receive a reply, but that the offer was now moot, since he has lost the authority to investigate.

But entries in the ledger appear to bolster Mr. Mueller’s money laundering and tax evasion case against Mr. Manafort, said Serhiy Leshchenko, a lawmaker who has closely followed the investigation. They indicate, for example, payments from Ukraine to a Cypriot company, Global Highway Limited, that was also named in an indictment Mr. Mueller filed in federal court in Virginia this year. The company covered hundreds of thousands of dollars of Mr. Manafort’s bills at a high-end men’s clothing store and antique shop in New York.

In another move seeming to hinder Mr. Mueller’s investigation, Ukrainian law enforcement allowed a potential witness to possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia to leave for Russia, putting him out of reach for questioning.

The special counsel’s office has identified the man, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, Mr. Manafort’s former office manager in Kiev, as tied to a Russian intelligence agency. Mr. Kilimnik was also under investigation in Ukraine over espionage, but no charges were filed before he left the country, sometime after June. During the 2016 campaign, Mr. Kilimnik met twice with Mr. Manafort. In December, a court filing in the United States said Mr. Kilimnik was “currently based in Russia.”

But in the United States, Mr. Mueller’s office appears still keenly interested in Mr. Manafort’s ties to Russia. Among the questions Mr. Mueller would like to ask Mr. Trump, according to a list provided to the president’s lawyers, was: “What knowledge did you have of any outreach by your campaign, including by Paul Manafort, to Russia about potential assistance to the campaign?”

In Kiev, the missile sale was seen as a political victory for Mr. Poroshenko, indicating American backing for his government in the war in eastern Ukraine against Russia-backed separatists and against the threat of a wider Russian intervention in the country. After Ukraine announced on April 30 that it had received the missiles, Mr. Poroshenko posted on Facebook that “the long-awaited weapon arrived in the Ukrainian Army.”

Apart from the missiles, the Ukrainian government is propped up with about $600 million in bilateral aid from the United States annually. Mr. Poroshenko’s office did not respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.

David Sakvarelidze, a former deputy prosecutor general who is now in the political opposition, said he did not believe that the general prosecutor had coordinated with anybody in the United States on the decision to suspend the investigations in Ukraine, or that there had been a quid pro quo for the missile sale.

Ukrainian politicians, he said, concluded on their own that any help prosecuting Mr. Manafort could bring down Mr. Trump’s wrath.

“Can you imagine,” Mr. Sakvarelidze said, “that Trump writes on Twitter, ‘The United States isn’t going to support any corrupt post-Soviet leaders, including in Ukraine.’ That would be the end of him.”

Last summer, another member of Parliament, Andrey L. Derkach, initiated an investigation into leaks to the news media about Mr. Manafort’s dealings from Ukrainian law enforcement, saying they put at risk vital American aid to Ukraine. He has openly opposed any Ukrainian role in aiding the special counsel’s investigation.

Ukraine, Mr. Derkach said in an interview, would be taking grave risks if it assisted in what he called a politicized investigation in the United States. In Ukraine, he said, “everybody is afraid of this case.”

 

Edited by Francisco 2.0
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bolverk said:

If this all turns out to be true -- and you still support Trump -- I hope you're disowned by all your friends and family. You will have forfeited the privilege of being called an American, much less a Texan.

Sorry.  The state of Texas and its millions of idiots don't get a pass on this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

But what we REALLY need to talk about is Hunter Biden.

Which is odd, because I thought everyone was talking about Podesta.

Old news. Now everyone at the UN comes up to congratulate him on the GOP’s YUGE house special election victory from weeks ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thought of Trump being finished just....just like that...is wild. I don't know if we're there yet but with the signals coming from republicans it's going to be really hard to bury this and a shit ton more will come out now as the dam breaks. In other news, I stand to make $400 on predictit if Trump doesn't make it to the end of the year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Not going to happen.  

As unstable as the Matrix has been lately I wouldn't be surprised if Pence declared himself Queen Bitch and declared October to be national cock appreciation month.

Edited by F250
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...