Jump to content

NFC championship -- Green Bay @ SF


NowThis

Recommended Posts

Just now, Vic Mackey said:

This is 2 asskicking for Rodgers and the Packers in the NFC title game in a row. Blown out by Atlanta in 2016. 3 total NFC title losses in a row. Seattle in 2014.

 

Cowboys fan talking shit about another team losing 3 title games in a row. god damnit Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vic Mackey said:

Pointing out facts is talking shit? Not really. It's reality. Rodgers turns into a clown in this round aside from one time.

He's not been great, but he's also played on the road all 4 times and been a 7+ point underdog in three of them. He was 8/10 for 93 yards at one point against the Falcons in 2016 and was down 17-0, because his kicker missed a FG and his FB fumbled the ball inside the Atlanta 20.

He doesn't play up to his standards (which is annoying), but he also doesn't catch breaks the way plenty of other HoF QBs do by getting carried from time-to-time in big games like this. Brady just won a Super Bowl scoring 13 points last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aggie08 said:

Aaron Rodgers hasn't really been Aaron Fucking Rodgers in a handful of years. And he strikes me as a dude with other interests. I bet he retires when he still has a little gas in the tank, unlike his contemporaries.

arm's tired from carrying fatass McCarthy all those years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

This is 2 asskicking for Rodgers and the Packers in the NFC title game in a row. Blown out by Atlanta in 2016. 3 total NFC title losses in a row. Seattle in 2014.

 

He's the only reason they've ever been there.  The defense has been atrocious his entire career.  He typically doesn't have the playmakers that other quarterbacks have had.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, txhorns said:

He's the only reason they've ever been there.  The defense has been atrocious his entire career.  He typically doesn't have the playmakers that other quarterbacks have had.  

he should've left them if he had a chance after his first SB win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Blotto said:

Down 27, means 3 TDs and 3 2 pt conversions + FG to tie, rather than 4 TDs. Not sure what is so mystifying about that.

the downside risk is too much.  I think it's easier to have that 4th TD than to make 3 2pters and a FG to tie, whereas the 4th td wins it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

If you don’t get it, you still win with 4 tds. 
if you do get it, you have another option. 

they didn't get it and it'll be a tie with 4 tds and the traditional xp. The 3rd td makes it 34-27 and the 4th ties it. Moot though given reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...