Jump to content

Things not going well for Joe Rogan


Parliament

Recommended Posts

On 9/21/2020 at 5:09 PM, MagicSoccerSpray said:

He didn't declare because he was told he wouldn't be endorsed by Obama and he was guilted into "healing" because his son had died recently. Why wouldn't Obama have endorsed him? Why was HIllary a "better" candidate? Why are you incapable of discussing this without name calling?

Negged for getting caught in a lie and then just making shit up that no person could possibly know.

I kind of agree about the name calling.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2020 at 5:12 PM, wildcat09 said:

Because I’m sick and fucking tired of you fascist-enabling dipshits and your bad faith that you think is clever because you have an iq of 65. Fuck you. Why don’t you go do what your godking Trump suggested and inject some bleach to protect yourself from covid? 

I retract my general remark about name calling. Anything is fine so long as it's well done. Well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, slorch said:

That's a funny way of saying he'd be an empty suit puppet motherfucker.

Thus, by far the better choice in this election. He's not malign. Biden is more than you suggest, but I'll just take anyone who cares about the country and understands what a republic is supposed to be. If Biden turns out to be Gerald Ford, I'll cheer loudly at the upgrade.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we pretty much covered it. He’s an above average comedian who’s a bit too open minded which makes him think it’s ok to have dudes like Alex Jones on. But also let’s him have on all sorts of interesting characters from some interesting ass professions. I don’t particularly mind SOME of the conspiracy stuff as long as it’s him and some stoner being like “duuuude I bet the Clintons and Bush’s and all them do some Eyes Wide Shut kind of shit! I mean they have to be bro, right!?!?” The shit he pulled with the wildfires along with endorsing Bernie who HAD A FUCKING HEART ATTACK to making fun of Biden for being old and senile all while defending trump all the fucking time, yeah. He’s lost me for the time being. I also think he was spreading some dangerous covid info back in the spring. Could be wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

Negged for getting caught in a lie and then just making shit up that no person could possibly know.

I kind of agree about the name calling.

 

Is the fucking New York Times lying? Is Politico full of shit? Or are you just a cynical moron so used to bad faith you act like it exists from the start willing perception into reality? Not one of my previous statements was untrue or based on any bias or prejudice.

For the narcissistic children reading: *BIDEN WILL WIN* *NO ONE IS STANNING TRUMP HERE* So the questions remains, Once a 78 year old declining Biden is elected, and he is immediately tested by the Russians, the Chinese, or has a mess erupt in the ME/Venezuela/Mexico: how will he react? Can he stay up for 20 hours for 5-6 days at time? Will he demonstrate that his mental acuity is better than the current administration's low bar? Can Kamala take over if needed and can she be trusted to competently run foreign policy with no experience? *IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW BAD DT IS, THIS QUESTION IS FOR THE FUTURE*

I anxiously await nonsensical replies chock full of bad language, poor syntax, and filled with simple stupid pet names for your least favorite politicians. You dumb fucking stupid children.

 

1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

I retract my general remark about name calling. Anything is fine so long as it's well done. Well done.

 

You aren't half as clever, nor as tasteful, as you believe.

 

  • Fuck You 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok sure whatever. But he actually gives a fuck about his fellow Americans. And I assume he’s gonna have some bad mother fuckers working for him who, yet again, actually care about our country. So yeah we’re gonna be fine. What exactly were you trying to prove here? Of course him being old isn’t ideal, but he’s still sharp as a whip, is in great shape and HE’S NOT A FUCKING NARCISSIST WHO’S CLINICALLY FUCKING INSANE!!!! So basically, just shut the fuck up. And if Biden has a stroke or something, Harris will do just fine. Matter a fact, if something shitty happens to Biden, Harris could fuck around and end up being one our best presidents if only due to the fact that the administration before her was so fucking incompetent. At everything. 
 

Wait holy fuck, Joe? That you? Welcome to Austin, Rogan. Go back to being the stoner who shoots the shit with some awesome fucking people. Little to no politics, please. You really fucking suck at that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2020 at 12:54 AM, MagicSoccerSpray said:

 

Is the fucking New York Times lying? Is Politico full of shit? Or are you just a cynical moron so used to bad faith you act like it exists from the start willing perception into reality? Not one of my previous statements was untrue or based on any bias or prejudice.

For the narcissistic children reading: *BIDEN WILL WIN* *NO ONE IS STANNING TRUMP HERE* So the questions remains, Once a 78 year old declining Biden is elected, and he is immediately tested by the Russians, the Chinese, or has a mess erupt in the ME/Venezuela/Mexico: how will he react? Can he stay up for 20 hours for 5-6 days at time? Will he demonstrate that his mental acuity is better than the current administration's low bar? Can Kamala take over if needed and can she be trusted to competently run foreign policy with no experience? *IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW BAD DT IS, THIS QUESTION IS FOR THE FUTURE*

I anxiously await nonsensical replies chock full of bad language, poor syntax, and filled with simple stupid pet names for your least favorite politicians. You dumb fucking stupid children.

 

 

You aren't half as clever, nor as tasteful, as you believe.

 

Who the fuck are you?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, staboner said:

yeah thats unforgiveable

It was dumb to say that, but it was clearly his choice.

Bit more circumspect here. But, this is also where his format fails.  People will continue to trip over the snippet and won't listen to longer description.  Podcast boy gonna have to eat it, but I'm sure that $100MM will soothe him.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, SizzleChest said:

It was dumb to say that, but it was clearly his choice.

Bit more circumspect here. But, this is also where his format fails.  People will continue to trip over the snippet and won't listen to longer description.  Podcast boy gonna have to eat it, but I'm sure that $100MM will soothe him.

 

So he invites toxic people that promote racist misogynistic views onto his show and then is shocked and hurt when he gets pushback on it. I don't dislike the guy, but grow the fuck up with that sensitive bullshit. Research your guests if you're going to be so sensitive about what people think about your guests. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^thanks for that video. while some of his points are true he still sounds like a defensive little bitch. you lose me at the "everyone is just so toxic and intolerable" yes Joe like that nazi guy. 

the "intolerable liberal" is just a tired and dumb angle to take for your defensive strategy. just call out the nazi and leave it at that. losing the smidge of respect i had for this fucking guy. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, staboner said:

^thanks for that video. while some of his points are true he still sounds like a defensive little bitch. you lose me at the "everyone is just so toxic and intolerable" yes Joe like that nazi guy. 

the "intolerable liberal" is just a tired and dumb angle to take for your defensive strategy. just call out the nazi and leave it at that. losing the smidge of respect i had for this fucking guy. 

Yeah, I’ve got zero fucking patience for the types that think liberals are bad and wrong for shaming them for befriending nazis.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Asked my buddy who is a Rogan fan what he thought of Alex Jones being on the show.  He said he's just a guy with different opinions who has uncovered some good stuff.  Tried to explain that he's just a disinformation spreading piece of shit, but got shouted down by the wife and her friend because I was causing drama.  I'm questioning this friendship.

Edited by Biff Tannen
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sent Spotify a support email and told them they better do something about this Alex Jones conspiracy theory bullshit or millions would dump their asses for Amazon or Google services. Actually heard back and they said “yup our ceo is looking at this right now and is concerned.” Strongly recommend that another couple hundred support emails will get their attention.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Good to know, [mention]Dbeasy [/mention] .

I’m going to do the same.

We pay for three premium subscriptions so I really hate financially supporting a company that promotes that kind of garbage but my college kids ain’t giving up Spotify for shitty Apple Music.

Family plan gets you 6 separate logins for 15/month

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to live at the same address according to the terms I saw - I have two in college. I wonder how they actually check that. We’ve had our accounts way so long so I also wonder if we could merge over all our own content if we could do the family account.

Guess I need to Google that mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"mostly fun"
 

I’ve got a mossberg 500 with 12 slug buck shot, 8 round capacity for that mother fucker if he wants to come try and “choke [this] tranny.” If that’s not enough I’ve got a gloc 37 with a 17 round mag loaded with hollow points for him too. Fuck joe rogan and the proud boys. Fuck all of them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Possible.  More likely he's just a stoner that likes to think he's above the fray.

 

11 hours ago, BrickHorn said:

And for sure he’s a fucking dumbass. 

Tonight he texted me an episode to listen to that “has a lot of great discussion about free speech”.  I don’t think I have the stomach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

I sent Spotify a support email and told them they better do something about this Alex Jones conspiracy theory bullshit or millions would dump their asses for Amazon or Google services. Actually heard back and they said “yup our ceo is looking at this right now and is concerned.” Strongly recommend that another couple hundred support emails will get their attention.

this is hilarious.  Let us know how the manager responds Karen.  An entertainment podcast (radio show) has crazy but entertaining guest on and this board is losing their shit.  Shock radio has been around for decades.  So scared the rest of the world is just a sheep waiting to be herded.  Free speech covers the good and importantly, the bad.  The push for censorship is just plain sad.  "Giving a platform" is just code for censorship, the cloak room is "giving a platform" for our resident surly socialists, its no different.

West Mall was always about protecting the rights of the lunatic's free speech in the "town square", not we want voices silenced when they don't conform.

The trigger level is fierce

Edited by ChickenSandwich
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

this is hilarious.  An entertainment podcast (radio show) has crazy but entertaining guest on and this board is losing their shit.  Shock radio has been around for decades.  So scared the rest of the world is just a sheep waiting to be herded.  Free speech covers the good and importantly, the bad.  The push for censorship is just plain sad.

The trigger level is fierce

Freedom of speech has nothing to do with Spotify, but you knew that already.

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

this is hilarious.  Let us know how the manager responds Karen.  An entertainment podcast (radio show) has crazy but entertaining guest on and this board is losing their shit.  Shock radio has been around for decades.  So scared the rest of the world is just a sheep waiting to be herded.  Free speech covers the good and importantly, the bad.  The push for censorship is just plain sad.  "Giving a platform" is just code for censorship, the cloak room is "giving a platform" for our resident surly socialists, its no different.

West Mall was always about protecting the rights of the lunatic's free speech in the "town square", not we want voices silenced when they don't conform.

The trigger level is fierce

Do you think the government should force companies like Spotify to air controversial speech?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

this is hilarious.  Let us know how the manager responds Karen.  An entertainment podcast (radio show) has crazy but entertaining guest on and this board is losing their shit.  Shock radio has been around for decades.  So scared the rest of the world is just a sheep waiting to be herded.  Free speech covers the good and importantly, the bad.  The push for censorship is just plain sad.  "Giving a platform" is just code for censorship, the cloak room is "giving a platform" for our resident surly socialists, its no different.

West Mall was always about protecting the rights of the lunatic's free speech in the "town square", not we want voices silenced when they don't conform.

The trigger level is fierce

the ceo will respond in the platform's best interest. free speech is about government interference in free speech, not the spotify platform telling joe rogan to screen his guests better. and his little sidekick may have been doing a little conspiracy gag bit with the free ghislaine shirt, but it's a bad look when you've got the guy who called the sandy hook slaughter of children a hoax. alex used to be entertaining in a weird way. now he's a really sad guy who has found he needs to get even crazier in his rants in order to resonate with his audience of q-diots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2020 at 10:51 AM, wildcat09 said:

It's gonna be wild when BT starts stanning for Alex Jones.

Is it "stanning" for someone to say that the person said something true? Or if that person says something true we're suppose to say it's a lie? Honest questions.

Alex Jones himself is old news. He's a lunatic and an idiot. He's emotionally disturbed and a freak and an abusive prick. He's not a necessary or important voice and if he went radio silent today the world would overall be a much better place. He's also not literally wrong about 100% of everything he says.

There's a huge problem when we just let conventional wisdom rule everything without independent thought. Nice liberal groupthink is still groupthink. We shouldn't pretend true statements are false because it violates the agreed-upon list of Good Guys and Bad Guys.

As usual, the hysterical reaction to Rogan seems once again to be a bunch of liberals posturing at each other to see who can cancel the hardest. (And yes, this can be construed as alt.right nonsense, but it's not wrong.)

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

this is hilarious.  Let us know how the manager responds Karen.  An entertainment podcast (radio show) has crazy but entertaining guest on and this board is losing their shit.  Shock radio has been around for decades.  So scared the rest of the world is just a sheep waiting to be herded.  Free speech covers the good and importantly, the bad.  The push for censorship is just plain sad.  "Giving a platform" is just code for censorship, the cloak room is "giving a platform" for our resident surly socialists, its no different.

West Mall was always about protecting the rights of the lunatic's free speech in the "town square", not we want voices silenced when they don't conform.

The trigger level is fierce

I don't need to touch the idiocy of your "FREEDOM DURRR DURR" comments, others already have that covered.

It's one thing to describe a dumb conversation between "shock jocks" as pure entertainment, but that's not what this is and it's not what the criticism is about. When your podcast reaches the level of influence as the JRE and you accept a $100 million dollars from a corporation to sponsor it, you don't get the benefit of playing the "dumb entertainment" card when your entire schtick is about seeking truth and hearing everyone out and pretending that there aren't any consequences to the shit you allow to be said in your "free flow of ideas." When you accept that kind of money, you accept a loss of some editorial control and if that isn't what the parent corporation chooses to do, then there will be natural consequences from its paying customers. That's not censorship, that's just market forces at work. 

 

Edited by Gourmand
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...