Jump to content

GOT Hot Take


pepper brooks

Recommended Posts

Quote

His argument was that the first 7 seasons were so good that the ending couldn't tarnish it.  I had the exact opposite take that the ending was so poorly written, thought out rushed and lame that it rendered any re-watch and previous greatness neutered and the entire thing is nothing more than a colossal waste of time.  What say you, surly tv aficionados?

He's talking about the final season.  No one said a single episode ruined the series.

 

Edited by TriStone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His argument was that the first 7 seasons were so good that the ending couldn't tarnish it.  I had the exact opposite take that the ending was so poorly written, thought out rushed and lame that it rendered any re-watch and previous greatness neutered and the entire thing is nothing more than a colossal waste of time.  What say you, surly tv aficionados?
He's talking about the final season.  No one said a single episode ruined the series.
 

So a single episode ruined a season?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

imagine this were a series of books instead of a television series. 3/4 of the books were amazing, incredible storytelling, dialogue, complex character development, intricate plots intertwining, surprises around every page, and complex world building. then the last 1/4 were written as if the author had a stroke, became regarded, and wrote cliffs to finish out the series. dialogue was shit, there was no storytelling, and all of the plots and character development built in the first 3/4 were completely forgotten or undone with the weakest of justifications in the last 2 chapters of a 8 book series.

would you read the books again?

fuck no i wouldn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Junior Miller said:

The show peaked at the Battle of the Bastards. If you wanted to re-watch just stop with that episode. It was all downhill immediately after that one although I still think it was a good show just not to the lofty standards. 

Good point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the show got shitty well before the Battle of the Bastards, they just were able to still drop in a great episode or two such as BoB. still, seasons 5 and 6 were not on par with 1-4, then 7 fell off even more (save a couple of episodes), and then S8 was just like a cruel joke that completely undid everything that had come before it. still, this idea that the show maintained greatness and then fell off a cliff is just plain wrong. it started going downhill years before S8.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Goo Punch said:

the show got shitty well before the Battle of the Bastards, they just were able to still drop in a great episode or two such as BoB. still, seasons 5 and 6 were not on par with 1-4, then 7 fell off even more (save a couple of episodes), and then S8 was just like a cruel joke that completely undid everything that had come before it. still, this idea that the show maintained greatness and then fell off a cliff is just plain wrong. it started going downhill years before S8.

Yep.  5-6 were, on average, significantly worse than 1-4, despite some fantastic episodes, like Hardhome and Winds of Winter.  This coincides with the the showrunners starting to run out of book material and the book material being lower quality as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they passed the books did Martin provide any direction to the showrunners, or does he not even know how he plans on wrapping it up?  Hopefully he doesn't write a chapter where Dany is flying with her dragon and just happened to miss an armada hiding behind a rock in the ocean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all a matter of preferences but I disagree. I don't think it had fallen off a lot other than the moment of pure soap opera cheesiness when they killed off Jon Snow as a season finale cliffhanger only to have a minor character bring him back to life the next season. That was horrificly bad and at the time I thought that was the shark moment but I think it rebounded nicely from then up until battle of the Bastards. The next episode where they had every story line they had worked and built up just wiped clean with a Cersi reversal was the beginning of the consistently sharp downward slide IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many great characters either died, had their roles reduced, or were sent off into these long, uninteresting story lines. think about these characters and their roles from seasons 1-4, and then after:

Tywin Lannister

Tyrion

Khaleesi

Jon Snow

Arya

Littlefinger

Cersei

Oberyn Martell

Lady Olenna

Stannis Baratheon

Reinli Baratheon

to name a few. 

Those characters, and their gravitas, and their ability to carry a scene, and GRRM's amazing writing got replaced with dragons, zombies, zombie dragons, and the most hackneyed, lazy, trite writing imaginable. for me the noticeable decline started around season five, and it only got worse from there on out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gene Parmesan said:

When they passed the books did Martin provide any direction to the showrunners, or does he not even know how he plans on wrapping it up?  Hopefully he doesn't write a chapter where Dany is flying with her dragon and just happened to miss an armada hiding behind a rock in the ocean.

yes.  He told them the broad plot plans.  But they were too incompetent to pull any of it off well without a detailed roadmap in the form of a novel.  

 

1 hour ago, Gene Parmesan said:

I didn't find Ned's death that shocking.  I mean yeah his POV was the main focus of season 1, so I guess you call him the main character but I never really thought of him as the protagonist of anything bigger.

Image result for james franco wut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bschoolprof said:

yes.  He told them the broad plot plans.  But they were too incompetent to pull any of it off well without a detailed roadmap in the form of a novel.  

 

Image result for james franco wut

I mean people refer to that as some shocking moment.  But when watching I wasn't shocked.  His whole time in KL was pretty much him vs the establishment and it wasn't shocking that the establishment crushed him.  He was just the only character we really knew anything about at the moment, but to me that doesn't necessarily mean he's the main character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to go back to that time and see that HBO had Ned/Sean Bean front and center in promotions during the first season and he got top billing in the opening credits. He was presented as THE man the show would focus on. 

Of course that was done intentionally to make more of a shock value but at the time any person unaware of the book story never saw that coming due to how prominent he was. 

Edited by Junior Miller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve always thought of the ending of the series like this. When Benioff and Weiss were chosen to do the show (back in 2005) I bet they thought the 5th book would be out by the time the last season of the show, so they would only have one or two seasons without source material to draw from. Instead, they ended up doing the last three seasons on their own and we all found out that they’re nowhere near the writer that GRRM is.

I wish they had kept their focus on GoT instead of branching out to other projects (which no doubt diluted the quality of the final few seasons), but I suppose in Hollywood you need to strike while the iron is hot since you never know when your days are numbered. 

Edited by Yev Kassem
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Junior Miller said:

I think you have to go back to that time and see that HBO had Ned/Sean Bean front and center in promotions during the first season and he got top billing in the opening credits. He was presented as THE man the show would focus on. 

Of course that was done intentionally to make more of a shock value but at the time any person unaware of the book story never saw that coming due to how prominent he was. 

That may be the case.  I didn't watch the show live from the beginning.  I started streaming season 1 when season 3 was airing and it was getting good buzz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emelia Clark wanted to quit.  Other actors sided with her maybe because of her brain thing.  I remember seeing an interview with a group of actors when they were doing promo in Australia before the start of 8.  The reporter asked the group about it and  peter Dinklage got this sad look on his face and said "don't .. just don't".  No one else said anything.  It looks like all the actors are a united front on this for now anyway.  HBO caved and guaranteed fewer and shortened seasons toward the end.  There probably would have been 10 seasons 10 episodes each.  It wasn't just the lack of books to go by that made the last few seasons suck.  It was rushed because they didn't want to replace Clark with a different actor.  When I try to find the news reports about it online from Fox or CNN they seem to have vanished.  Hopefully HBO learned it's lesson.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Goo Punch said:

Too many great characters either died, had their roles reduced, or were sent off into these long, uninteresting story lines. think about these characters and their roles from seasons 1-4, and then after:

Tywin Lannister

Tyrion

Khaleesi

Jon Snow

Arya

Littlefinger

Cersei

Oberyn Martell

Lady Olenna

Stannis Baratheon

Reinli Baratheon

to name a few. 

Those characters, and their gravitas, and their ability to carry a scene, and GRRM's amazing writing got replaced with dragons, zombies, zombie dragons, and the most hackneyed, lazy, trite writing imaginable. for me the noticeable decline started around season five, and it only got worse from there on out. 

yeah, but you see, much of this was done by martin in the books.

i've transitioned from blaming benioff and weiss to blaming martin. he has no idea how to finish his own story. he branched out too far in his narrative and there are now too many threads for him to tie off. he is the one that lost the plot with those characters, then he stopped publishing material. even his last couple of novels are vastly inferior to the first three, because he had the narrative too big to fit in between the covers of the books. shit, he had so many stories that he had to split one novel into two novels that ran concurrently in different geographies. that actually happened. 

and benioff and weiss found themselves trapped in the same manner, and had to really start taking shortcuts to make the tv episodes work. the narrative was plenty fucked before they even ran out of material, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...