Jump to content

NASA ULA/Boeing Artemis SLS 2nd hotfire attempt :: T minus 4 mintues


Hagbard Celine

Recommended Posts

i know this is using a bunch of mostly rehashed parts from the 70s but it's really going to be man rated in a year or so?  i guess i'm used to the spacex model of test test test test test test test test test now

Edited by elfenix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know this is using a bunch of mostly rehashed parts from the 70s but it's really going to be man rated in a year or so?  i guess i'm used to the spacex model of test test test test test test test test test now

I thought the goal was this:

2021 - Artemis 1 (unmanned)
2023 - Artemis 2 (manned, lunar orbit but no landing)
2024 - Artemis 3 (manned, boots on the moon)

So it would best case scenario be ready for humans in 2-3 years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RamjetFDO said:

It's going to suck to use and throw these away, though ... got kinda used to reusing them on the Shuttle program.

Yeah aren't those engines pretty special pieces of hardware? The engine bells are extremely complex, not to mention the rest of the turbopumps, etc that feed the combustion

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Captainant said:

Yeah aren't those engines pretty special pieces of hardware? The engine bells are extremely complex, not to mention the rest of the turbopumps, etc that feed the combustion

Yup - the RS-25 is an engineering marvel.  *Designed* for reusability from the start - with the SpaceX Merlin engine picking up that mantle and running with it, too.

The RS-25 generates about 1.5x the specific impulse and 2.5x the sea-level thrust that a single Merlin engine does.  So - it may be more cost effective to load up and throw away more Merlins on an expendable stage than to produce throw-away RS-25's.  Hell, SpaceX may end up creating "disposable" Merlins at a reduced per-unit cost.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, RamjetFDO said:

SpaceX may end up creating "disposable" Merlins at a reduced per-unit cost.

Or just re-use a Merlin booster 9 times and then for it's 10th launch deploy it on a mission that requires it be disposed of to achieve T/leo or T/Ve

As an Apollo Orphan and Elonfanboi the audacious play would be to go with a 4-pack Falcon Heavy (4 side booster + the core booster) each having fulfilled their 10-use economic design criteria.  The brilliance of a throttled engine shines in this config where you can launch with the center core at reduced power, only enough to make sure the engineering of the stack remains solid, drop the 4-pack when they are spent, and throttle up the core booster for additional T/Ve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Hagbard Celine said:

Or just re-use a Merlin booster 9 times and then for it's 10th launch deploy it on a mission that requires it be disposed of to achieve T/leo or T/Ve

As an Apollo Orphan and Elonfanboi the audacious play would be to go with a 4-pack Falcon Heavy (4 side booster + the core booster) each having fulfilled their 10-use economic design criteria.  The brilliance of a throttled engine shines in this config where you can launch with the center core at reduced power, only enough to make sure the engineering of the stack remains solid, drop the 4-pack when they are spent, and throttle up the core booster for additional T/Ve.

Asparagus staging is best staging

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...