Jump to content

Things not going well for BLM


Johnny Sack

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

What if I think it sucks for *bothsides*? I think gerrymandering is one of the biggest reasons for the shitty discourse in this country. When your only fear of losing your seat is getting flanked by someone more extreme in your own party, you have no motivation to do anything but squawk about how "evil" the other side is. There should never be a +20 district for either party. If the software exists to make these crazy Rorschach test districts that are +20 or +30 R or D, then that same software could be used to draw every district +/- 3%. Make congress critters go out and win the adults in the middle based on their ideas and records of public service. There are so many issues that poll over 60% in both parties, but we can't solve them because our "leaders" would rather fundraise off them than get in a room with the other party and solve them.  

You sound like a pussy communist socialist libtard who hates America and doesn't MAGA hard enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

huh?

“Progressives” like Susan Sarandon and Killer Mike couldn’t bring themselves to support Hillary because she wasn’t Bernie and wittingly contributed to our having a conservative majority on the Court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone has the same access to vote.  Voting has never been easier.  There are weeks of early voting in Texas.  Some of the most restrictive states are northern, liberal states.
As to gerrymandering, it has happened for over 100 years.  It is why democrats had a stranglehold on the House for most of the 20th century.  It is also an issue caused by the requirement for minority majority districts.  Democrats still do it in states they control but don't like it that the GOP is now doing it now that the GOP wins statewide elections in a majority of the states.
What proof do you have Abrams really won?

I have been locked up all day long with appointments. Will respond later when I get back to a computer so I can cite properly.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
16 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

Mayor Adams should know better than to talk like this 

You're right, lots of Black organizations acknowledge the issue and are working for improvements, but they're easy to ignore so you guys can keep saying "HOW COME thEy DoN't CArE aBOUt bLacK On black CrimE?"

But the Mayor of New York City? He's a little harder to ignore, but I'm sure you will next time you want to lie and say nobody caring about the issue.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

Mayor Adams should know better than to talk like this 

The sadly irony-deaf Trumpers are really missing a good show. Yes, people like Johnny Sack and Immaculate Vibes are the very experts and concerned citizens needed to advise BLM. The only way to really deal with racism is to let white dickheads tell everybody what they should be doing.

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Nivek said:


Still nothing? I see you are still posting. Do you need more time?

What’s your question?  That Abrams really won?

She didn’t.  And claimed she did.  
 

And BLM is a fraud.  Only good thing they do is rip off white liberals.  

Edited by Johnny Sack
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

 Only good thing they do is rip off white liberals.  

Probably why Vague Unnamed BLM Leader paid 25 million to settle a fraud case involving his "university".

Or why Vague Unnamed BLM Leader's charitable foundation was found so irredeemable in federal court it was ordered dissolved- given the charitable foundation equivalent of the death penalty- and ordered to reliquish all its assets.

Or why Vague Unnamed BLM Leader promised to DRAIN THE SWAMP by promising to self-finance presidential campaign, beholden to no one, while currently and openly raising over a hundred million and spending hardly any of it.

Got to get up pretty early in the morning to get one by you, Eagle Eye. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Probably why Vague Unnamed BLM Leader paid 25 million to settle a fraud case involving his "university".

Or why Vague Unnamed BLM Leader's charitable foundation was found so irredeemable in federal court it was ordered dissolved- given the charitable foundation equivalent of the death penalty- and ordered to reliquish all its assets.

Or why Vague Unnamed BLM Leader promised to DRAIN THE SWAMP by promising to self-finance presidential campaign, beholden to no one, while currently and openly raising over a hundred million and spending hardly any of it.

Got to get up pretty early in the morning to get one by you, Eagle Eye. 

So, but Trump?

If only there was another thread or 20 to discuss his actions   

 

Edited by Johnny Sack
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to add-

I would not at all be surprised if scams relying on BLM appeals or fronts occur anymore than I was surprised that Boogaloo Bois used George Floyd protests to murder LEOs. With MAGA, it is, as evidenced here, open and unapologetic. 

Edited by Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

Mayor Adams should know better than to talk like this 

So a Black democrat, the highest profile mayor in America and one the highest profile politicians, went on national TV and said the things that right-wingers want him to say and/or that “no one is allowed to say.”

This is a point for you now, exactly? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s your question?  That Abrams really won?
She didn’t.  And claimed she did.  
 
And BLM is a fraud.  Only good thing they do is rip off white liberals.  

Hey, you are back! I hate to tell you this, but some asshole has hacked your account and posted a bunch of easily challenged bullshit under your account name. Guy even got clowned by a geologist. I mean who loses an argument to a dickhead that collects rocks?
  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s your question?  That Abrams really won?
She didn’t.  And claimed she did.  
 
And BLM is a fraud.  Only good thing they do is rip off white liberals.  

Hey, you are back! I hate to tell you this, but some asshole has hacked your account and posted a bunch of easily challenged bullshit under your account name. Guy even got clowned by a geologist. I mean who loses an argument to a dickhead that collects rocks?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait... Leaders of an organization have ethical and fiduciary failures, followers of that organization are continually acting in ways that contradict the movement's values? 

Well, shit. Wrap it up then... We're done here. It was a good try, but I guess Christianity is all a big scam. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 3
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NWBuck said:

Wait... Leaders of an organization have ethical and fiduciary failures, followers of that organization are continually acting in ways that contradict the movement's values? 

Well, shit. Wrap it up then... We're done here. It was a good try, but I guess Christianity is all a big scam. 

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
15 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

She should be exposed and is deserving of every bit of the scorn directed her way. Meanwhile:

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172 million and $640 million in outside income while working in the White House, according to an analysis of financial disclosures by CREW. It is impossible to tell the exact amount as the income is sometimes reported in broad ranges and cover four months of income before Ivanka Trump officially joined her father’s administration and nearly one month before Jared Kushner joined.

Both Kushner and Trump announced they would not take a salary while working for the government in an attempt to shut down nepotism concerns. While their supporters marked this as a public sacrifice, the massive amount of money they made on the side undercuts that argument, as government salaries would have been less than 1% of their income.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Satchel said:

She should be exposed and is deserving of every bit of the scorn directed her way. Meanwhile:

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172 million and $640 million in outside income while working in the White House, according to an analysis of financial disclosures by CREW. It is impossible to tell the exact amount as the income is sometimes reported in broad ranges and cover four months of income before Ivanka Trump officially joined her father’s administration and nearly one month before Jared Kushner joined.

Both Kushner and Trump announced they would not take a salary while working for the government in an attempt to shut down nepotism concerns. While their supporters marked this as a public sacrifice, the massive amount of money they made on the side undercuts that argument, as government salaries would have been less than 1% of their income.

You should start a thread on Trump.  This board needs another.  This thread is about the corrupt entity BLM.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Satchel said:

640 million dollars while working in the White House.

And?  That is the top end.  He was rich before Trump was elected.  He and his family own a shitload of real estate.  His brother has more money than he does.  Was Kushner supposed to turn down rent or something? From Fortune:

Overall, the disclosures suggest Trump and Kushner, though still extremely wealthy, lost ground or tread water economically during their controversial stints in her father’s administration. In 2017, shortly after joining the White House staff, they reported income of as much as $195 million, but that initial disclosure covered a longer period of time than the ones that followed.

The couple’s assets appreciated only modestly, if at all, over the last four years, during which the stock market climbed more than 60%. In their most recent disclosure, they listed assets worth between $206 million and $803 million, compared to a 2017 figure of between $241 million and $741 million. They listed assets worth between $203 million and $783 million last year.

 https://fortune.com/2021/02/03/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-income-hit-white-house/

Edited by Johnny Sack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, purplepride95 said:

gun-violence-418.jpg?quality=90&strip=alScreen-Shot-2020-02-17-at-1.41.44-PM-102

0603_SF_March_01.jpg

bs-md-300-men-march-20150417

 

First thing that comes out there mouth without doing any research. I went to HS in a bad area. They always had anti violence, drug, and gun assemblies. Jesse Jackson even came to speak once. The narrative that we don't care is false.

 

How many of those efforts, marches, and assemblies does Fox News ever cover?  Now you have your answer as to why the "why don't black people do something?" crowd keeps asking a question based on a falsehood.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, purplepride95 said:

gun-violence-418.jpg?quality=90&strip=alScreen-Shot-2020-02-17-at-1.41.44-PM-102

0603_SF_March_01.jpg

bs-md-300-men-march-20150417

 

First thing that comes out there mouth without doing any research. I went to HS in a bad area. They always had anti violence, drug, and gun assemblies. Jesse Jackson even came to speak once. The narrative that we don't care is false.

 

Deny. Distract. Deflect. It's all they've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

You should start a thread on Trump.  This board needs another.  This thread is about the corrupt entity BLM.

You are back!   I knew you couldn't stay lost forever.  Does counselor need more time still to respond to a months old post? 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

But but 

Why would people such as yourself focus on the 7 figure grift of of a BLM operative while ignoring grift in the Trump family?

Edited by Satchel
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Satchel said:

640 million dollars while working in the White House.

 

5 minutes ago, Satchel said:

Why would people such as yourself focus on the 7 figure grift of of a BLM operative while ignoring grift in the Trump family?

Quote

 

For generations, U.S. presidents have gone to great lengths to avoid potential conflicts of interest. When I was elected, I followed suit by placing my small business in a blind trust to assure our citizens that I would always put the country’s interests ahead of my own. It’s a vital presidential tradition. That’s why I find it a bit curious that our new commander-in-chief has been allowed to ignore it.

For Christ’s sake, you people made me get rid of my peanut farm before you let me be president.

I grew up on that farm. When my father died, I moved back home and worked those fields with my own two hands to keep it afloat. It was a hard job, but it was so rewarding. It wasn’t just a business—it was the place I called home. Letting go of the family farm was one of the hardest things I’ve ever had to do, but I did it because the American people asked me to. I did it for their sake, without enthusiasm, but also without hesitation.

Boy, times sure have changed, haven’t they? I couldn’t help but notice that the current occupant of the White House owns more than 500 companies, has business interests across the Middle East and Asia, and owes hundreds of millions of dollars to banks he is now responsible for regulating. It seems a touch unfair that a bigger fuss was made about my little peanut operation than all his office towers, hotels, and golf courses combined. All I had was a farm, you know? A small, precious farm.

Seriously, it was just a few fields and a warehouse, and you idiots still appointed a special prosecutor and spent six months investigating it.

Not a day goes by when I don’t think about what life would be like if I still had my peanut farm. I miss it so much. I miss feeling the sun on my face. I miss the earth in my hands. Sometimes, I’d go out to the fields before dawn. I’d watch the sun come up, watch it cast golden light on my plants, row by row. It was so calm; so quiet. Those were some of the best days of my life. It sure would’ve been nice to live out the rest of my years there, but I had to do what was right. I suppose only some of us have to.

God, I loved that peanut farm!

And where were my conflicts of interest, exactly? Seriously, do enlighten me, America, because I honestly have no idea. Did you worry I might be cutting deals in back rooms with the peanut butter lobby? Or that I might be too busy at harvest time to focus on the economy or the Middle East? Apparently, you did, and almost obsessively. Meanwhile, your new president holds a lease from the federal government to operate a $200 million hotel six blocks from the White House. I mean, come on!

Maybe I’m just a sucker. Apparently, all I needed to do was hand off control of the farm to my family. If I’d staged an elaborate song and dance about distancing myself—whatever that means—from all the day-to-day planting, picking, and salting, maybe I could have kept my peanut farm with the full blessing of you, the American people.

esides, that peanut farm would probably be worth $200 million today, easy.

https://www.theonion.com/you-people-made-me-give-up-my-peanut-farm-before-i-got-1819585048

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Nivek said:

You are back!   I knew you couldn't stay lost forever.  Does counselor need more time still to respond to a months old post? 

I don't really keep track of you like you do me.  But is this about Stacey Klump losing the election by 54,000 votes and her repeating the Big Lie the election was stolen?

A quote from her:

"I have no empirical evidence that I would have achieved a higher number of votes. However, I have sufficient and I think legally sufficient doubt about the process to say that it was not a fair election." https://web.archive.org/web/20190429012042/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/28/magazine/stacey-abrams-election-georgia.html

 Or this:

On November 9, 2018, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that its investigation of the 2018 statewide elections in Georgia had found "no evidence ... of systematic malfeasance – or of enough tainted votes to force a runoff election". https://www.ajc.com/news/scattered-problems-emerge-georgia-voting/oQxJq2DOKu8o32pd0mvAxN/#

Or this:

A USA Today fact check noted that the actions Kemp's office took during the election "can be explained as routine under state and federal law"; political scientist Charles S. Bullock III said there is "not much empirical evidence supporting the assertion that Kemp either suppressed the vote or 'stole' the election from Abrams." https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/18/fact-check-partly-false-claim-gov-brian-kemp-and-2018-election/6327447002/

 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...