Jump to content

Austin Transportation & Roadways


Longhorn Al

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CooterBrown said:

To be fair, Texas was to a degree fucked by the old state law that required that all adjacent landowners be provided driveway access to state roads. As a result, that was a big driver for our frontage road system. It gave access without having driveways directly on highways. It created congestion because it allowed development directly on the frontage roads instead of arterials away from the highways. 

 

Thereby making the areas along our highways look like shitholes.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/3/2021 at 7:17 AM, Pasken said:

This. People would be shocked at how much we could improve traffic flow if we just focus on making highways and roads smarter instead of wider.

Like not having 183 north bottle neck from 4 lanes to 3 lanes and back to 4 lanes again in a 4 mile stretch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2021 at 12:52 PM, JimmyJames said:

That ramp was a classic TXDOT aggy fuck up and I’m glad it’s finally being fixed.

Our state definitely has to lead the country in having to fix on and off ramp freeway fuckups by a mile. Numerous examples all over Austin and sometimes I wonder if it’s not deliberate. 

narrator: it's deliberate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2021 at 1:03 PM, CooterBrown said:


Back my consulting days, I attended a transportation planning conference. During one presentation, the head of the Colorado DOT said to assure success in highway design, states should look at TxDOT’s lead and then do the opposite. Ripping TxDOT’s incompetence was a disturbingly common occurrence at those conferences.

there's an app for that

 

On 5/2/2021 at 7:55 PM, Paper_jam said:

When the Manor Expressway (toll portion of 290E) was being built, a contractor working from an outdated set of plans built a bunch of enormous support columns to the wrong height. Version control is a bitch sometimes.

aggystairs.gif.f7ea2d1690e8b950041bd21160badf31.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lobo

Proponents/Grifters of 130 in 2010:  We must build it from IH-35/45 to the south near Creedmoor to IH-35 to the north near Georgetown! 

Taxpayers in 2010:  Will it help alleviate semi-truck traffic from Austin to Round Rock?  Will help thru traffic navigate this congested stretch of Central Texas IH-35?  Will it make all roads involved safer and better maintained without any cost to the taxpayers?  

Proponents/Grifters in 2010:  Of course it will!  SH-130 will do all of that and so much more!

Taypayers in 2020: So it's been ten years, what has SH-130 helped with?  Trucks?  Traffic?  Commuting?  Safety?

Proponents/Grifters in 2020:  Well, a couple weekends a year it helps race fans get to a Formula 1 racetrack...whatever that is still.  And it'll help a handful of rich people get to their jobs at a Boring Company in SE Austin, who'll help build hyperloops that will render highways like 130 obsolete in a few years.  Pretty cool, huh?  

Edited by Lobo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drive 130 between 71 & 45 in RR at rush hour (in non-pandemic times) for the answer to that question. There is a reason the third lane is being added as we type.

yeah the grift is there - see the almost ignored scandal of the 130 segment from 45 south to Seguin having to be rebuilt several years ago for tens of millions because the original contractor “cut corners”. Nobody went to jail over that one as far as I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Armybrat said:

Drive 130 between 71 & 45 in RR at rush hour (in non-pandemic times) for the answer to that question. There is a reason the third lane is being added as we type.

yeah the grift is there - see the almost ignored scandal of the 130 segment from 45 south to Seguin having to be rebuilt several years ago for tens of millions because the original contractor “cut corners”. Nobody went to jail over that one as far as I know.

Brat is right.  You may not like 130 and that's fine but it still serves a big community and will help bring desperately needed development to this part of town as development pops up around it.

Also, anyone who says trucks don't take 130 don't ever drive on 130. You could ban trucks from 35 but you would have a lot of empathy HEBs, Targets, CVSes and just about every other commercial building considering they all require trucks to service loading docks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

require mandatory gps transponders to use i35 from 130 in georgetown to 610 in san antonio

dps can't detect a transponder in your truck?  get pulled over, $10k fine

spotcheck for proof of manifest/deliveries in williamson, travis, hays or comal counties

75% of the trucks clogging i35 in downtown austin are hauling freight from mexico north of the red river or heading home from the same

those trucks belong on 130 and would improve the downtown situation by 20%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hagbard Celine said:

 

75% of the trucks clogging i35 in downtown austin are hauling freight from mexico north of the red river or heading home from the same

 

No way.
Sure maybe they start and end in each spot, but they are also stopping in Austin/Round Rock along the way.

there is no way 3 out of 4th truck is just passing through Austin.

most studies show it’s the opposite. 3 out of 4 have business in Austin and ~20% are just passing through 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brat is right.  You may not like 130 and that's fine but it still serves a big community and will help bring desperately needed development to this part of town as development pops up around it.
Also, anyone who says trucks don't take 130 don't ever drive on 130. You could ban trucks from 35 but you would have a lot of empathy HEBs, Targets, CVSes and just about every other commercial building considering they all require trucks to service loading docks.

Also, the rebuild was done by the contractor under warranty. Drove them to bankruptcy but didn’t spend public$
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/4/2021 at 12:45 PM, TKthunder2 said:

Like not having 183 north bottle neck from 4 lanes to 3 lanes and back to 4 lanes again in a 4 mile stretch?

or not being able to stay in a middle lane on mopac from 2222 to slaughter?

also, now that i live in manchaca, i take the 45 toll to mopac, which is a joke of a toll, it's the shortest toll road ever, but whatever. why are the "work zone" signs still up down on the southernmost of mopac and the 55 mph speed limit still in effect? they've been done forever. travis county sheriffs just sit down there trying to pick off 55+ drivers, and i'm tired of monitoring my speed in a clearly completed non-construction zone.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hayden_horn said:

or not being able to stay in a middle lane on mopac from 2222 to slaughter?

also, now that i live in manchaca, i take the 45 toll to mopac, which is a joke of a toll, it's the shortest toll road ever, but whatever. why are the "work zone" signs still up down on the southernmost of mopac and the 55 mph speed limit still in effect? they've been done forever. travis county sheriffs just sit down there trying to pick off 55+ drivers, and i'm tired of monitoring my speed in a clearly completed non-construction zone.

45SW is the shortest toll over? LOL. Not remotely true and it's only a dollar. Try counting the tolling booths along the new 183.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

north mopac has a toll right before the interchange to 45, then literally before the you get off the ramp onto WB 45 there's another toll if you want to exit on to O'Connor.  it's maybe 3/4 of a mile between the tolls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lobo

I'm picturing you two (Pasken & Armybrat) in the back of the car like my two daughters on a highway, "Look a truck!"  "Truck"   "I see a truck!"  "Another one truck!"   "Yes everybody, there are trucks.  This is a highway.  There's going to be lots and lots of trucks."  

 

Edited by Lobo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hayden_horn said:

or not being able to stay in a middle lane on mopac from 2222 to slaughter?

also, now that i live in manchaca, i take the 45 toll to mopac, which is a joke of a toll, it's the shortest toll road ever, but whatever. why are the "work zone" signs still up down on the southernmost of mopac and the 55 mph speed limit still in effect? they've been done forever. travis county sheriffs just sit down there trying to pick off 55+ drivers, and i'm tired of monitoring my speed in a clearly completed non-construction zone.

They were still dicking around in the median and sides not too long ago but yeah, it seems done to me and I am ready for the 55mph signs to be ditched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know when they're going to start tearing up 360 to build the overpasses?  TxDot site doesn't say shit (at not that I can find).  Was supposed to start last year.

I just want to know when I need to start adding an extra 45 min each way before I go anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or not being able to stay in a middle lane on mopac from 2222 to slaughter?
also, now that i live in manchaca, i take the 45 toll to mopac, which is a joke of a toll, it's the shortest toll road ever, but whatever. why are the "work zone" signs still up down on the southernmost of mopac and the 55 mph speed limit still in effect? they've been done forever. travis county sheriffs just sit down there trying to pick off 55+ drivers, and i'm tired of monitoring my speed in a clearly completed non-construction zone.
Fort Bend County tolls individual overpasses on 99.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Samson's Wig said:

Anyone know when they're going to start tearing up 360 to build the overpasses?  TxDot site doesn't say shit (at not that I can find).  Was supposed to start last year.

I just want to know when I need to start adding an extra 45 min each way before I go anywhere.

I believe at least some of those were part of a shit ton of projects that were delayed indefinitely by CAMPO to fund 35 reconstruction with managed lanes instead of toll lanes. 

Edited by Pasken
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, gsoda3 said:

north mopac has a toll right before the interchange to 45, then literally before the you get off the ramp onto WB 45 there's another toll if you want to exit on to O'Connor.  it's maybe 3/4 of a mile between the tolls.

The best one is on 183.  You have to go 50 yards past the toll to exit Lakeline Blvd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Orange&White said:

If I remember correctly it is because of a federal law that prohibits forced use of a toll road. Interstate Commerce Act, maybe?

Install a 24/7 weigh station for through travel trucks just outside of the 35/130 intersection.  Every through truck would take the toll road in order to avoid wasted time at that weigh station.

 

 

Edited by CooterBrown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orange&White said:

If I remember correctly it is because of a federal law that prohibits forced use of a toll road. Interstate Commerce Act, maybe?

That’s why the bypass lanes were added at Parmer/620 when 45 was built.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, hayden_horn said:

or not being able to stay in a middle lane on mopac from 2222 to slaughter?

also, now that i live in manchaca, i take the 45 toll to mopac, which is a joke of a toll, it's the shortest toll road ever, but whatever. why are the "work zone" signs still up down on the southernmost of mopac and the 55 mph speed limit still in effect? they've been done forever. travis county sheriffs just sit down there trying to pick off 55+ drivers, and i'm tired of monitoring my speed in a clearly completed non-construction zone.

That lane reduction right after William Cannon is maddening. They don't even need to build an extra lane, they just need to re-stripe so there isn't a 25-foot shoulder on the left side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That lane reduction right after William Cannon is maddening. They don't even need to build an extra lane, they just need to re-stripe so there isn't a 25-foot shoulder on the left side.

They are saving that to be a toll lane
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Redneck Mutha said:

And 130 is only going to get worse as Amazon in Pflugerville and Tesla ramp up. 

Not to mention the potential for 10s of thousands of new home builds along that corridor. 

I read yesterday where the Bastrop CAD reported undeveloped land values increased 53% 2020-2021. East is about to explode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Steel Shank said:

I read yesterday where the Bastrop CAD reported undeveloped land values increased 53% 2020-2021. East is about to explode.

CTRMA is moving ahead on extending the 290 Expressway to Elgin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So 290 tollway expansion east to the west side junction with 95, or through Elgin to east of town, or a bypass to the east?

I've never been able to find the plan for either bypassing or upgrading through Elgin.  Is there a plan?  Doesn't help that the TXDOT Austin District's Project Tracker won't load today.  Perhaps because the link says Bryan District?

https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/district/austin.html

http://apps.dot.state.tx.us/apps-cq/project_tracker/?DISTRICT_NAME=Bryan

 

Edited by clapclapclap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, clapclapclap said:

So 290 tollway expansion east to the west side junction with 95, or through Elgin to east of town, or a bypass to the east?

I've never been able to find the plan for either bypassing or upgrading through Elgin.  Is there a plan?  Doesn't help that the TXDOT Austin District's Project Tracker won't load today.  Perhaps because the link says Bryan District?

https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/district/austin.html

http://apps.dot.state.tx.us/apps-cq/project_tracker/?DISTRICT_NAME=Bryan

 

They are working on the engineering. I've only seen it discussed in slides in the CTRMA board meetings online. It's still really early. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lobo

Should be on the internet whilst speeding along all these corridors measuring distances between toll booths?  Fucking psychopath!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...