Jump to content

General / National Strike?


MaybeACoordinator

Recommended Posts

Humanity is in a war of redistribution of power, wealth, and fame from one society to another while all the time those responsible for causing the fight are never accused and believed to be the ones that are fixing the problems.


But that is what makes characters believable and genders playing the role worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, blackmarketbaby said:

Humanity is in a war of redistribution of power, wealth, and fame from one society to another while all the time those responsible for causing the fight are never accused and believed to be the ones that are fixing the problems.


But that is what makes characters believable and genders playing the role worthless.

People who willingly vote to help the rich are morons.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

England hasn't had a revolution in 500 years but they have had some general strikes, and they are regarded as one of the most pliable countries in Europe. Those strikes won them some concessions....But those were over labor conditions. There would have to be a coalition of those morally opposed to this administration with those who are economically harmed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

England hasn't had a revolution in 500 years but they have had some general strikes, and they are regarded as one of the most pliable countries in Europe. Those strikes won them some concessions....But those were over labor conditions. There would have to be a coalition of those morally opposed to this administration with those who are economically harmed. 

Or just vote. I'd be happy with 70% of eligible voters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gil Bang said:

I boycott Chick fil a because the food fucking sucks.  

 

That's some plain-ass shit that only the whitest of white people would like. 


It's horrible. 

I am not a huge fan either, but I dont think this is gonna work out well for you. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

If it's on the table, I'm listening.

But how would it work?

The threat of a national strike scares the shit out of the people in power.  The more it’s talked about, the more fear they have.

They should be afraid. 

A government should be afraid of its people, not the other way around.

Keep talking it up I say, even if it doesn’t happen.

But have a clear red line.  Like if Rosenstein or Mueller is terminated.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have record lows in  unemployment across race and gender metrics... and y'all callin for a strike?

 

tenor.gif?itemid=4888883

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Ok. Only the unemployed go on strike.

I love it!  leftist logic.   I mean, some of these folks have been working for all of 5 minutes and we're talking strike.   LOLz.

 

Who solves the strike?  The Feds???  Lolz.

 

It's as if someone found Coach Klein's magic green playbook and see some neat plays from yesteryear.  "Hey let's run this and see what happens..."  regardless of the circumstances or realistic outcome.

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, slorch said:

We have record lows in  unemployment across race and gender metrics... and y'all callin for a strike?

 

tenor.gif?itemid=4888883

Read a fucking book.

The unemployment rate in the USSR was 0%.

Jobs do not make a country, they enslave it.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USSR had 100% employment?  besides they ones who weren't murdered?

 

Why do y'all fucking hate what works?

 

Jobs don't make a country, but they feed it.  Y'all decry all of the afflictions of humanity and take course to absolutely avoid solving them.

 

People are literally dying to get here to work... and you bitches think you're being mistreated.

 

If you want more money:  Take on more responsibility and/ or improve your skill set.  It's a tried and true winner.

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, slorch said:

USSR had 100% employment?  besides they ones who weren't murdered?

 

Why do y'all fucking hate what works?

 

Jobs don't make a country, but they feed it.  Y'all decry all of the afflictions of humanity and take course to absolutely avoid solving them.

 

People are literally dying to get here to work... and you bitches think you're being mistreated.

 

If you want more money:  Take on more responsibility and/ or improve your skill set.  It's a tried and true winner.

Lol you think it’s about money 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do people take jobs?

 

and yes, I understand straight cash( Thank you, Mr Moss)  is not the only measure of compensation.

 

Not enough lube and porn to get through the week?

 

I would agree that many of you like disruption of shit way more than actually achieving anything.  So I'll concede your point.

 

next question:  why?

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The government is literally kidnapping children now and choosing not to return them.

This is a certificable fact.

How far down this road do we go?  

Their goal the whole time is to get people not to care.  They literally messaged that yesterday.

Fix the laws.

 

Enforce them properly.

 

or:

 

Disolve the borders.  Grant asylum to every swinging dick.

 

 

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The government is literally kidnapping children now and choosing not to return them.

This is a certificable fact.

How far down this road do we go?  

Their goal the whole time is to get people not to care.  They literally messaged that yesterday.

You sound like you are about to go an hero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dissolving borders isn't a realistic answer any more than prosecuting everyone who crosses the border. There was no planning in the policy change that was made and they are now scrambling after the fact under the weight of all these people and their lack of forethought.  I don't know about a strike an organized mass protest would send a message.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, burntorangebongos said:

Dissolving borders isn't a realistic answer any more than prosecuting everyone who crosses the border. There was no planning in the policy change that was made and they are now scrambling after the fact under the weight of all these people and their lack of forethought.  I don't know about a strike an organized mass protest would send a message.

This debate isn’t about immigration law.  That’s what they everyone to discuss.  

This is about state sponsored terrorism straight up.  They are persecuting and abusing children in the name of law and order and “national security”.  It’s an abomination that should be rejected with whatever peaceful power can be found by anyone willing to use it.

If this isn’t confronted now, we are only giving them permission to terrorize more people and sooner or later it will be you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Armybrat said:

It's all about money for those people trying to get in.

It’s about keeping jobs for the newly employed as well.

 

But fuck that.  We need to show Trump how wrong he is.

 

The laws predated his arrival and our demigogues ran the same shit show?  Doesn’t matter.  The government is terrorizing people breaking in to our country...illegally.

 

LOlz. Nice job Hugo.  Spin, spin, spin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...