Jump to content

Austin City Government - Circus of the Insane


skittlebrau

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, DanRydell said:

I don't remotely comprehend why they did this but yeah, it's going to be a fucking shitshow with people trying to turn left in and out of all the parking garages.

Because it was a 1 way street without a dedicated adjacent 1 way partner. Guadalupe/Lavaca complement each other but Congress is a 2 way street which means people needing access to NB Colorado were joining people who need NB on Guadalupe and congesting Lavaca. This should help clear up some congestion on both Congress and Lavaca. 

Edited by Pasken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it was a 1 way street without a dedicated adjacent 1 way partner. Guadalupe/Lavaca complement each other but Congress is a 2 way street which means people needing access to NB Colorado were joining people who need NB on Guadalupe and congesting Lavaca. This should help clear up some congestion on both Congress and Lavaca. 


Making one street significantly more dangerous to drivers and pedestrians in order to moderately reduce congestion on a street that wasn’t overly congested seems a poor trade off.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DanRydell said:

 


Making one street significantly more dangerous to drivers and pedestrians in order to moderately reduce congestion on a street that wasn’t overly congested seems a poor trade off.

 

The main NB avenue downtown isn't overly congested? Neither is Congress? If that is the case then why do people complain about downtown traffic? 

 

You're better taking advantage of a recently widened Colorado street which was under capacity with a 1 way designation. Seeing as how people mostly drive 2 way streets, I don't think you are making things that much more dangerous for drivers. Maybe it's more dangerous for bicycles but we can't make all our decisions by what are best for bikes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pasken said:

The main NB avenue downtown isn't overly congested? Neither is Congress? If that is the case then why do people complain about downtown traffic? 

 

You're better taking advantage of a recently widened Colorado street which was under capacity with a 1 way designation. Seeing as how people mostly drive 2 way streets, I don't think you are making things that much more dangerous for drivers. Maybe it's more dangerous for bicycles but we can't make all our decisions by what are best for bikes. 

You've just been laid off from council staff Pasken.  Check your inbox.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2018 at 3:00 PM, Pasken said:

Because it was a 1 way street without a dedicated adjacent 1 way partner. Guadalupe/Lavaca complement each other but Congress is a 2 way street which means people needing access to NB Colorado were joining people who need NB on Guadalupe and congesting Lavaca. This should help clear up some congestion on both Congress and Lavaca. 

Maybe it clears some congestion on Guadalupe, but what congestion is it going to clear up on Congress?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2018 at 2:15 PM, DanRydell said:

I don't remotely comprehend why they did this but yeah, it's going to be a fucking shitshow with people trying to turn left in and out of all the parking garages.

Cut 5 minutes off my drive home. I'll take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, demos said:

Maybe it clears some congestion on Guadalupe, but what congestion is it going to clear up on Congress?

People coming from the east that are going to Colorado that have to travel north.  It's not complicated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Pasken said:

People coming from the east that are going to Colorado that have to travel north.  It's not complicated. 

In my experience, there isn't a lot of northbound congestion on Congress once you get passed Cesar Chavez (even less once you're passed 4th)  and not many people coming from the east turning north on Congress. The bigger issue on Congress, imo, is southbound congestion at 5pm. 2-way Colorado doesn't really help that (not that it was helping significantly to begin with). 

Just don't see it helping Congress whatsoever. Might help Guadalupe, but the stretch where the two run parallel doesn't seem that bad in the morning,.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, zman13 said:

This should go over well:

Austin's Equity Office Proposes Renaming 7 Confederate Streets – And Even The City Itself

http://www.kut.org/post/austins-equity-office-proposes-renaming-7-confederate-streets-and-even-city-itself

 

 

Rename Austin?!?

looks like those arguing that removing the statues was a slippery slope might have been right.  (Only half kidding here)

 

tax dollars pay for this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They want to rename these streets:

  • Littlefield Street
  • Tom Green Street
  • Sneed Cove
  • Reagan Hill Drive
  • Dixie Drive
  • Plantation Road
  • Confederate Avenue

So rename them to:

  • Richard Allen Anderson Street
  • Roy Perez Benavidez Street
  • Thomas Elbert Creek Avenue
  • Alfredo "Freddy" Gonzalez Drive
  • Robert David Law Street
  • Milton Arthur Lee Street
  • George Andrew Davis, Jr. Street

That's a freebie.  I can come up with a lot more suggestions, but they'll cost ya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xian said:

Per Reddit, the head of that department takes home 145k of Austin’s tax payer dollars a year?

 

 

Does the Director of Bicycling still take home $90K / year?    

Real title, real salary from a few years back.  I'm guessing it's 6-digits by now. 

Edited by Wally Pryor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

 

So rename them to:

  • Richard Allen Anderson Street
  • Roy Perez Benavidez Street
  • Thomas Elbert Creek Avenue
  • Alfredo "Freddy" Gonzalez Drive
  • Robert David Law Street
  • Milton Arthur Lee Street
  • George Andrew Davis, Jr. Street

 

I'm sorry, but every one of those is offensive to me. You'll need to keep trying until the all names are not offensive to a single person on the planet. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

They want to rename these streets:

  • Littlefield Street
  • Tom Green Street
  • Sneed Cove
  • Reagan Hill Drive
  • Dixie Drive
  • Plantation Road
  • Confederate Avenue

So rename them to:

  • Richard Allen Anderson Street
  • Roy Perez Benavidez Street
  • Thomas Elbert Creek Avenue
  • Alfredo "Freddy" Gonzalez Drive
  • Robert David Law Street
  • Milton Arthur Lee Street
  • George Andrew Davis, Jr. Street

That's a freebie.  I can come up with a lot more suggestions, but they'll cost ya.

Lets name them all after Trump and his family members.  The ensuing meltdown would be epic.

 

Trump Street

Trump Cove

Ivanka Ave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does someobody know the rationale for why they closed off that gradual right turn from South Congress Bridge onto Barton Springs?  in front of that yeti store?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2018 at 12:04 PM, atomheartbevo said:

They want to rename these streets:

  • Littlefield Street
  • Tom Green Street
  • Sneed Cove
  • Reagan Hill Drive
  • Dixie Drive
  • Plantation Road
  • Confederate Avenue

Also Burnet Rd, Lamar Blvd, the Bouldin Creek neighborhood, Barton Springs and other things that have names that might have been associated with someone who may have owned slaves or been involved with the confederacy.  Here's the powerpoint presentation from the equity office:

http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/pio/document.cfm?id=302508

How do you distinguish between someone in the past who did something wrong and thus should not be recognized by having something named after them, and someone who followed the customs of the day that are wrong by today's standards?  Do you draw the line at everyone who owned slaves at a time when that was legal and a common source of labor for land owners, or do you draw the line at people who demonstrably abused people during that time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

AUSTIN — In a City Council message board on Wednesday, Austin Mayor Steve Adler suggested ceasing the CodeNEXT process and instead asking City Manager Spencer Cronk to create a new process that will help city leaders move forward together.

"Colleagues, I believe we should consider if the best way ultimately to find the right path to fix our land development code is to cease our current process and ask the City Manager to create a new process," Mayor Adler wrote. "While we have learned much and made gains as a council in our June work sessions, it seems evident that we’re not going to get to a place of sufficient consensus. Do we believe that continuing to chop at the same wood is going to change the outcome?"


Adler calls for the recommendation of a new process that builds on work made from the council and city leaders this far while working on the controversial code.

"I remain committed as I have throughout my term as Mayor to finding ways to slow or mitigate gentrification, to stop displacement of long-time residents, to preserve existing housing stock, to support our music and arts community and low and moderate income residents through affordability measures, to find ways to help Austinites who live here and to plan for those we know are coming, all without losing what has always made our city special and continuing to lead on sustainability measures that keep us healthy and safe," Adler wrote.

https://www.kvue.com/article/news/local/austin-mayor-steve-adler-suggests-ceasing-codenext-process/269-579382864

cross posting from the codenext thread. what a clusterfuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter how long you make your run-on sentence, or how many different ways you try to say this:

Quote

"I remain committed as I have throughout my term as Mayor to finding ways to slow or mitigate gentrification, to stop displacement of long-time residents, to preserve existing housing stock, to support our music and arts community and low and moderate income residents through affordability measures, to find ways to help Austinites who live here and to plan for those we know are coming, all without losing what has always made our city special and continuing to lead on sustainability measures that keep us healthy and safe," Adler wrote.

...it is fucking impossible to do all of those things. So eventually you have to grow balls and take an actual stance and get something done instead of standing around and wasting everyone's time and not accomplishing a fucking thing.

 

Edit - PS:  I am really glad that spending several million fucking dollars has allowed you and your council-mates to learn something and now you are ready to scrap all of that time, money and effort and start from fucking zero again. 

Apparently Adler has learned from CapMetro, if at first you don't succeed, just keep ramming the exact same shit sandwich down everyone's throat.

Edited by Orange^White
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does he understand that almost everything he says is a walking paradox?  Actually I shouldn't use the term "Everything he Says"...the ineffectual lip pursing he does that somehow passes as his platform.  You'd think a stooge for real estate development and title work would have a bit more zest.  Laura Morrison is twice the leader he was/is.  

It's a hard thing to do to be elected to guide CodeNEXT this far and then totally shit the bed with it, and then throw it under the bus and declare it being "wraught with cooties."  

 

What a fuck up, this Mayor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

Adler calls for the recommendation of a new process that builds on work made from the council and city leaders this far while working on the controversial code.

See, what you need is a charrette to agree on a process to conduct additional charrettes to agree on the parameters of a study, then a blue-ribbon panel to vet those parameters and send recommendations to additional charrettes, which can then agree on the final parameters of a study, engage a consulting firm to conduct the study, send the results of the study to the newly-created City Commission on Nifty Code Stuff, which will them release a report, which can be addressed by some more charrettes, which will produce a final recommendation to the Council, which will mostly look like "DON'T CHANGE ANYTHING!  PRETEND IT'S STILL 1978!"

There.  Skip to the end, and I just saved everyone a fortune, and 7 years of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that you used "charrette" properly many times.  It comes up in our hearings quite often and I used to want to take a shot or punch somebody every time I heard it, but now I just laugh because I now appreciate its industry/trade usage.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with this mayor, sadly, is that he’d rather be on the losing end of a 7-4 vote than prevail 6-5.

I’m not planning to get into COA stuff on surly the way I did on shag, but we’ve got a leadership vacuum and mistakes of inaction are being made in this period that will have negative consequences that cannot be undone. There was a window for this city to adapt more or less comfortably to our own growth. It stayed open for a long time. It’s closing soon.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

The problem with this mayor, sadly, is that he’d rather be on the losing end of a 7-4 vote than prevail 6-5.

I’m not planning to get into COA stuff on surly the way I did on shag, but we’ve got a leadership vacuum and mistakes of inaction are being made in this period that will have negative consequences that cannot be undone. There was a window for this city to adapt more or less comfortably to our own growth. It stayed open for a long time. It’s closing soon.

 

We've chosen what we want to be.  We chose it a long time ago.  We just need to fucking nut up and admit it.

We want to be a backwards-looking, exclusionary city, and fuck the rest of you very much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

The problem with this mayor, sadly, is that he’d rather be on the losing end of a 7-4 vote than prevail 6-5.

I’m not planning to get into COA stuff on surly the way I did on shag, but we’ve got a leadership vacuum and mistakes of inaction are being made in this period that will have negative consequences that cannot be undone. There was a window for this city to adapt more or less comfortably to our own growth. It stayed open for a long time. It’s closing soon.

 

Agree on the leadership vacuum, wholeheartedly. I know some in the business community pulled support from Adler after he rolled over on sick leave, but are grudgingly back in the game because of his opponent.

 

The only good thing I can say about this is that the money we spent on Code NEXT was a sunk cost. We were moving very quickly toward a land development outcome that would have cost the city far more. I hold some outside hope that we can rethink the process and come up with something better. It’s also quite possible that we can come up with something better in D1 after November.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...