Jump to content

Surly lawyer question- deposition question


Sbbruin

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
I clerked with a firm in the penthouse of the Allen Center back in the day, used to see Joe around quite a bit. I'd say every third word out of his mouth was fuck, god damn or son of a bitch. Thankfully not directed at me.

So, just like your average surly poster? But with more money.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have been served twice by email, and asked if I agree to accept service by email.  Twice I have said no.  They are trying to save money on process serving and court costs- the subpoena was only signed by the opposing counsel attorney and not submitted to the court.  Nice try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sbbruin said:

So I have been served twice by email, and asked if I agree to accept service by email.  Twice I have said no.  They are trying to save money on process serving and court costs- the subpoena was only signed by the opposing counsel attorney and not submitted to the court.  Nice try.

I thought lawyers could issue subponeas without court approval?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing is more frustrating to a deposing lawyer than the pleasant, calm witness who honestly and happily says “I don’t know” or “I don’t recall” in response to every substantive question.  

Not only is it a total waste of prep time, travel time, court reporter and videographer fees, and room rental, there’s really nothing you can as far as whining to the court is concerned. You can’t even use the video for color.  

If the witness is a dick, that’s useful even (maybe especially) if he says nothing useful. That video can be used to make the other side look like a bunch of con men and liars. 

Edited by Liquor and Poker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SKJ said:

I'm not a lawyer, and I don't even know where a holiday inn is, but can't you just refuse to answer questions?

At your peril. Unless you invoke the fifth, you are supposed to answer the questions.  If the other side wants answers badly enough and their questions aren't totally irrelevant, they can go to the court, they will likely win, and you will be paying for the second deposition. 

 

And it's here that things like demanding formal service, etc. can bite you in the ass. If the other side has to go to the court on an issue related to your deposition or document production, etc. and you have been uncooperative on matters such as scheduling and service, you can get hammered with attorneys fees and such. 

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

At your peril. Unless you invoke the fifth, you are supposed to answer the questions.  If the other side wants answers badly enough and their questions aren't totally irrelevant, they can go to the court, they will likely win, and you will be paying for the second deposition. 

 

And it's here that things like demanding formal service, etc. can bite you in the ass. If the other side has to go to the court on an issue related to your deposition or document production, etc. and you have been uncooperative on matters such as scheduling and service, you can get hammered with attorneys fees and such. 

Wow.

I guess I hope I never get deposed. I have a strong stance of never answering questions.

If you're not a party to the lawsuit, why do you have to answer anything? That seems ridiculous to me. I guess the old I don't recall is all I could even say. Fuck that. 

Seriously, though, if you have to talk, especially in a civil matter where you're not getting sued, why the fuck do we even have a Constitution?

That seems so backwards to me. I mean, could I just say something like I'm just minding my business? Is there a law that compels you to talk about shit that isn't any of your business? That seems stupid to me. I never talk about shit someone else does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

At your peril. Unless you invoke the fifth, you are supposed to answer the questions.  If the other side wants answers badly enough and their questions aren't totally irrelevant, they can go to the court, they will likely win, and you will be paying for the second deposition. 

 

And it's here that things like demanding formal service, etc. can bite you in the ass. If the other side has to go to the court on an issue related to your deposition or document production, etc. and you have been uncooperative on matters such as scheduling and service, you can get hammered with attorneys fees and such. 

Why would I get hammered on attorney’s fees for refusing to accept service via email?  In fact I didn’t refuse, I just didn’t acknowledge.

Edited by Sbbruin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At your peril. Unless you invoke the fifth, you are supposed to answer the questions.  If the other side wants answers badly enough and their questions aren't totally irrelevant, they can go to the court, they will likely win, and you will be paying for the second deposition. 
 
And it's here that things like demanding formal service, etc. can bite you in the ass. If the other side has to go to the court on an issue related to your deposition or document production, etc. and you have been uncooperative on matters such as scheduling and service, you can get hammered with attorneys fees and such. 

This is correct.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.
I guess I hope I never get deposed. I have a strong stance of never answering questions.
If you're not a party to the lawsuit, why do you have to answer anything? That seems ridiculous to me. I guess the old I don't recall is all I could even say. Fuck that. 
Seriously, though, if you have to talk, especially in a civil matter where you're not getting sued, why the fuck do we even have a Constitution?
That seems so backwards to me. I mean, could I just say something like I'm just minding my business? Is there a law that compels you to talk about shit that isn't any of your business? That seems stupid to me. I never talk about shit someone else does.

Well, you could say the same thing about being called to testify in court as a witness when you are not a party to the suit or being charged in a criminal trial.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NeverMarryAStripper said:


Well, you could say the same thing about being called to testify in court as a witness when you are not a party to the suit or being charged in a criminal trial.

Well, then I guess we would have to find out what they're willing to do...

I've never been compelled to testify in court, but I would just tell them upfront, then flat-out refuse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DanRydell said:

 


At which point you would be fined and/or jailed.

 

Which seems perfectly reasonable for someone who just wants to mind his own business.

But I guess they'll do what they have to do, just as I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/13/2018 at 8:07 PM, Tonesky said:

Open your wallet and hire a fucking lawyer. 

I have my depo on Wednesday.  And yes, I have hired an attorney.  He's the best lawyer in LA.  He's such a good lawyer, that by Thursday morning, the deposing attorney's gonna be working in Alaska.  So she better dress warm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/6/2019 at 7:07 PM, Sbbruin said:

Why would I get hammered on attorney’s fees for refusing to accept service via email?  In fact I didn’t refuse, I just didn’t acknowledge.

You would not be hammered solely for "demanding" formal service. However if you continue on a course of obstreperousness, it could be one of several factors indicating your lack of cooperation, which could result in an award of attorneys fees in a scenario like I painted. You kind of never know when a single act of shittiess is going to come back and bite you on the ass when plugged into a larger picture.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 5:32 PM, Sbbruin said:

I have my depo on Wednesday.  And yes, I have hired an attorney.  He's the best lawyer in LA.  He's such a good lawyer, that by Thursday morning, the deposing attorney's gonna be working in Alaska.  So she better dress warm.

Avenatti?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 4:32 PM, Sbbruin said:

I have my depo on Wednesday.  And yes, I have hired an attorney.  He's the best lawyer in LA.  He's such a good lawyer, that by Thursday morning, the deposing attorney's gonna be working in Alaska.  So she better dress warm.

10zvcyt.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/7/2019 at 2:27 AM, SKJ said:

Which seems perfectly reasonable for someone who just wants to mind his own business.

But I guess they'll do what they have to do, just as I.

After about 3 hours in jail with 179 days to go, you’d be begging to answer any question I had.

On 1/18/2019 at 5:32 PM, Sbbruin said:

I have my depo on Wednesday.  And yes, I have hired an attorney.  He's the best lawyer in LA.  He's such a good lawyer, that by Thursday morning, the deposing attorney's gonna be working in Alaska.  So she better dress warm.

So you start this thread, and we get no after action report? Did you act like a tool and get your shit handed to you?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 4:32 PM, Sbbruin said:

I have my depo on Wednesday.  And yes, I have hired an attorney.  He's the best lawyer in LA.  He's such a good lawyer, that by Thursday morning, the deposing attorney's gonna be working in Alaska.  So she better dress warm.

Did he send her to Fairbanks or Anchorage?  Or maybe Sitka?  Homer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 5:32 PM, Sbbruin said:

So she better dress warm.

Pics of opposing attorney?

(Is this Nam?)

ETA:  Don't do this.

On 12/12/2018 at 4:03 PM, Sbbruin said:

I have not been asked to bring records but I will as they support the position I am taking.  

Edited by DoobieWah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2019 at 8:28 AM, 4th and 5 said:

After about 3 hours in jail with 179 days to go, you’d be begging to answer any question I had.

 

On 1/30/2019 at 3:12 PM, SKJ said:

Ha ha ha ha you're not serious, are you?

People who react like this seriously need to spend 3-4 days in jail.  Unless you like jail (some people like being told what to do, when to do it and where to do it).  If that’s the case, you’ll get there on your own.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The back story on 4th&5s post is the ultimate personal sanction (not monetary or dismissal of your suit), for non-cooperation or abuse of the discovery process, in Texas, is a civil contempt citation and sentence of 180 days in the county jail.  Usually, that is "purgeable," ending the jail sentence, by providing the requested and ordered discovery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...