Jump to content

Drew

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    14331
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Drew

  1. That was one play, and a dumb play, please don't mistake me for giving Sark a pass. That doesn't excuse the inability to hit a wide open WR from a clean pocket with your feet set. The rushed throws, the throw when he's under pressure...sure. Okay i'll be the asshole and say I don't really see much here to bitch about from Wingo. Maybe some are so over wingo they're projecting...but this seems like a guy who ran a play that didn't hit, went to the bench cause he's already over there and sat down. I don't see shit on his face that even says he's upset honestly.
  2. My thoughts too...but smartly. Don't use a 1st-3rd on a full on Rental. A guy who'll be here for 2-3 years at least, or one you'll resign immediately. Not without some additions they won't...as said above, this team will never "reset/rebuild" and since their draft picks have been a crap shoot lately, I don't think it's a horrible idea to use one on a proven commodity. Not really surprising is it? Even if they don't trade him now, he'll be gone tis offseason... The past offseason ruined everything for Dallas and him. They don't want him, and he don't want to be here. When it gets to that, it's time to go...
  3. really great write up there... The defense could probably tee off more and be more aggressive if they had faith the offense would keep the ball and make up for it if they made a mistake.
  4. All i keep saying is he should not be throwing 5 ft over the head of someone 10 yards away with no within miles of him when he's not being rushed...is that really asking too much?
  5. Oh jesus that's a tough catch either way, and I'd probably say this throw wasn't as far behind.
  6. I assume they want 3 big name teams/games for the whole "all day SEC" lineup. Our game, leading into Georgia/Florida(yes it's lost luster but still a big rivalry) into a good matchup with Sooners/Vols. All of this...they were on the field a lot and still made plays to get off when needed. Yeah could change if a lot of stuff happens...but I figure it'll be ABC at 11 if both Vandy/Texas wins.
  7. He's one of them...why would they care where he's walking?
  8. Drew

    Hubris

  9. nah bruh, that IS an excuse when he's under pressure or when he's getting killed. He's actually really good at avoiding big hits and sacks. He hasn't been taking big hits even with all the pressure. I'm sorry, when the guy is open, and you have time, you have to hit him. You can't blame it on "well he was pressured the play before so of course he missed that one", it's a silly take.
  10. Javonte could be kept if his number stays around 10. If he gets above that there's no way they would keep him, and probably shouldn't. The OL should be better by the end of the year with more experience and they can find another guy. But I do hope they keep him if he keeps this up. I would agree in principle to not trading for "win now" players...especially Rentals. but if they were to say, use one of those 1st on a Max Crosby type...a guy who could be "win now" AND is under 30 and under contract till 2029, that would make sense. In that case you're getting a PROVEN player, where they need him, and have him under control for much less than Micah for a little bit less of a player. You guys know I'm usually higher on Dallas drafting than anyone...but I think getting a proven commodity would be just as useful as using a high pick on a rookie who could be hit or miss. I just wouldn't do it for a mercenary type rental.
  11. Tortillas...serious business.
  12. I am honestly not sure based on his accuracy and slow processing issues. make no mistake those ARE problems, as is Sarks playcalling...but we've seen way too many balls hit the dirt, over throw, underthrow, too far behind to say he'd be great with a better OL and no pressure. Pretty much I want to believe this...I HOPE he does. He just hasn't shown it but maybe in one game this year(not counting SHST) and even against OU there were some bad signs mixed in with the good. And I'd take that if it had followed to Kentucky. All fo this. This is where I'm at...maybe Caldwell or whoever isn't any better, but maybe, just maybe they are...and while I don't think anyone will provide the amazing plays Arch can at times, I do think someone else might be able to run the offense to the point where they move the chains by simply hitting a guy who's open.
  13. And he's wasn't amazing then either. We totally ignored the warning signs against Miss St
  14. my issue too. he can make the great play but is so bad at the basic stuff. it's infuriating.
  15. Have you not seen me clearly say multiple times he's a fucking problem? His coaching, his recruiting, his decisions to keep Flood...that's him. I just will not let you people pretend that those of us that see Arch is NOT good, are in the wrong by blaming him at all.
  16. Fucking this. My whole thing isn't that I think someone else is "better". I don't think the backup can make the plays Arch does...but I'm also not sure he CAN'T hit the basic throws that Arch misses way too much.
  17. Funny...the Cowboys would be too, if not 6-1
  18. It is surly, so yeah, you're probably right. But if you read any of these threads you'll pretty smart posters all but doing flips to excuse everything wrong with him and blame the OL and Sark and the WR's and give him a pass. I do NOT think the offense will be "fine" with another QB. I do think it's is POSSIBLE they could be better, even if slightly so, with a QB who could make the most basic throws that Arch is missing. And I never said that about the OL last year. I thought Ewers struggled with the deep ball(he does) and had happy feet, and took sacks. I thought Arch would be better by improving in those areas. He has...but he doesn't have the same accuracy as Ewers did, or the touch on the screens and short to middle passing that Ewers did. Yeah if fucking funny. Could just be bad recruiting/evaluations (BTW OSU sorta gave up on Ewers too...so maybe it's not just that Sark couldn't' coach him up) And I've clearly said I think Sark a problem...but I'm just not going to excuse Arch when he can't complete simple passes either like some will.
  19. Probably nostalgia but i can still watch it.
  20. Never said it wasn't...but I will continue to say Sark isn't making Arch miss wide open WR's even when they're standing still and he's got a clean pocket. I am in now way, shape, or form, excusing Sark for anything. But even when he gives Arch "easy throws" Arch misses them. That's all i've been saying and why I want to know what the offense looks like with a QB who can make the basic plays any college QB can make.
  21. Yeah even i said that's a strange take...the original was damn near perfect.
  22. Oh a lot of us blame both. The issue is those who flat out refuse to see Arch struggling a lot due to his own performance, instead of placing every single fault on Sark(he has enough to be blamed for honestly).
  23. Which was my point...someone calling that a drop is fucking silly. And I'm sorry getting 2 hands on it sounds so fucking easily said when the guy is running full speed the opposite way and has to reach back fully extended to even get his hands to attempt the catch. That's why i think the "wingo sucks cause he can't catch" narrative was stupid too.
  24. Which is what I said...I'd ONLY be down for it if it was a long term piece and NOT a Rental, even if it were a Pickens impactful rental. I would gladly take a 1st-3rd on a real proven player who's locked up for 2-3 more years than hoping a rookie hits. and you KNOW our track record wtih 2nd rounders being tossed for "first rounders if healthy" type players.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...