Jump to content

Al_4_ISU

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    12126
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Al_4_ISU last won the day on September 14 2019

Al_4_ISU had the most liked content!

Reputation

13535 Surly 1%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. A nice reminder that my recollection of him not being a total asshole prior to COVID was valid.
  2. Or was it Diseased Iguana Brewing’s specialty?
  3. Beautiful
  4. I'm gonna see DBT for like the 8 millionth time next month with Deer Tick. Should be a hoot.
  5. Never had west. Love east and Gulf.
  6. Drive-By Truckers and The Hold Steady were at the peak of their powers in the early to mid aughts. Nothing but pummeling riffs and tales of miscreant behavior. None of the passivity bullshit that absolutely existed in that era (and I say that as someone who graduated HS in 2003 and was already annoyed with it then).
  7. Can you tell me what the power ball numbers are?
  8. I’ve had chili cheese brats from a small town locker that were excellent.
  9. I'm seeing now that Sankey will push for an ESPN metric to determine the CFP rankings. If that's the case, I switch to firmly in the 4-4-2-2 camp because ESPN is 100% going to use that to fill it with SEC teams and keep Big 12 teams out.
  10. And I can't imagine there will be any proposed system that will give any true blue blood fits for making it into the playoff with a minimum of 8-9 wins.
  11. As a fan of a school in the Big 12, I'm don't know that I even care all that much about which method (between these two) ends up getting selected. I know that my school (and the other schools in this league) isn't going to win a natty. I don't see a massive difference in outcome from one method to the other. I just want to know that my school is allowed to objectively play it's way in, and the game stops getting farther away from the sport I fell in love with. I'm fine with the allocation of the 4-4-2-2 model (I think it's fair), I just don't like the idea of an invitational (the codifying different strata doesn't bother me as much as it does the decision makers). I think 5/11 because I think it makes for a better product (I enjoy conference championship games) and I think a pure invitational kinda sucks as a sports fan. I'll watch regardless as long as my school is allowed to participate. This just doesn't seem like a situation with an obvious best choice from my perspective. There are existential risks in either path. We don't have much control anyhow, and what's going to happen in this support for good or bad will happen regardless of the Big 12 or ACC.
  12. Well no shit they aren't being altruistic. Your next point is exactly what I said up the thread. Not codifying second tier status is the primary goal. But this absolutely allows them to pay "walk the walk" type lip service to the idea they've been tossing around (that the most powerful leagues should care more about what's best for everyone), regardless of how bullshit it actually is. It's not their motivation, but it's something they can use. The Big 12 and ACC aren't in a power position, and they know it. I really doubt that they honestly believe that they're going to gain on the blue bloods. The SEC and Big 10 can just drive this into the ditch whenever they want. If the Big 12 and ACC agree to 4-4-2-2 they're in a shitty spot. If they agree to 5/11 they're in a shitty spot. If they agree to 4-4-2-2 what's to stop the SEC and Big 10 from changing it to 5-5-1-1 in another two years? Nothing. They can now do what they want. This is a play at perception. It's the best hand the Big 12 and ACC have. Work to effect public perception and hopes that the viewing masses push back against the SEC and Big 10 formally hoarding power on top of having all the de facto power. We all know that turning the playoff into an anti-competitive invitational sucks. Does anyone really want that product? I mean, outside of Sankey and Pettiti.
  13. I think Klatt's missing the mark here. I think the committee will frequently screw over the Big 12 with odes to "eye test" and "good losses", but at least they (the Big 12) aren't publicly saying "we're signing up for a guaranteed less". They're also planting a bit of a strategic flag in saying "we know we'll get less than we want some times, but it's the right thing for the good of the sport". I think at this point most Big 12 officials are more interested in staying in the game than maximizing revenue in the short term. Especially when the playoff gets reformed every single year. The Big 12 isn't super likely to get more bids this way, but I don't think that's what they're after in this negotiation.
  14. I could be wrong here, but didn't it basically end at the mountains? My understanding (from about 8 audiobook listens of Empire during planting and harvest) is that they were relatives of the Shoshones who left the mountains for the south plains, and never really returned to the mountains in any significant capacity. Plenty of scrub plains in CO and NM.
×
×
  • Create New...