Jump to content

Brian Fantana

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    11085
  • Joined

Everything posted by Brian Fantana

  1. I'm gonna make fun of them because most of them are aggy
  2. Sorry I told you I was fishing. I am very bad at fishing so it's mostly just drinking/consuming edibles.
  3. Ok cool please don't kys on the way out the door
  4. I don't know who you think you're talking to. I think Texas should be higher ranked and should be in. I'm only pushing back on the notion that you'd be favored by double digits or whatever and beat us by 20+. You want to talk about matchups and yet you want to delude yourself into believe that your objectively below average O-line would roll over our objectively very very good front 7. It's just not happening. There is no analyst or objective metric out there that would agree with you on that take. I think it would be a great game and I wish it could happen. You guys beating aggy was the easiest pick I've made all year in the office pool. They had played a terrible schedule up to that point, and it was even an inflated one considering the handful of SEC teams on their schedule that lingered around in the rankings that absolutely did not belong there. You played OU in Mateer's first game back, when he was clearly still injured, before Venables took over defensive playcalling, etc. That's neither here nor there, because y'all whipped their asses, but I've been saying all year that they fucking suck and so does Alabama, and they're clearly getting far too much credit for that win. It is what it is. Vandy has been a paper tiger all year, they've gotten washed by the two competent teams they've played this year. That was the second easiest pick I've made all year. I've also said all along that the Ohio State loss shouldn't count at all, and the Georgia game was just one of those games. They're locked in, it is what it is.
  5. Ok Wilcox did your other account get timed out or something? Give mommy her phone back.
  6. Lol if you think I'm the one doing this. I'm pushing back on chainsaw doing this. Absolutely, fuck ND and Miami. Let Texas in and whoever else and drop them both. In fact, don't ever let ND back in until they join a conference.
  7. Ok, I could say your OL didn't look particularly impressive against fucking UTEP, but that's neither here nor there.
  8. I mentioned 2 earlier, also I told you I'm fishing so if you want more you're gonna have to wait.
  9. Utah's O-line is way better than yours. They have at least 2 first round draft picks on that line.
  10. There are plenty of models out there and I haven't seen one that predicts Texas would be favored on a neutral field. I've been asking for it for hours at this point.
  11. Yeah he could just like sit there and say what he really feels as a totally objective guy and they'd just set the lines that way How could they lose?
  12. Ok and I fucked your mom, and sister, at the same time. There's an equally useful data point.
  13. Again this is all just subjective opinion. I don't care about any of that, at all. Sorry, it's nothing personal.
  14. With what? Our front seven fucking washes your O-line. I'm sorry, but there's not a single fucking person outside the UT fanbase that would disagree with that take.
  15. Like I don't understand the weird narratives around here. I think Texas deserves to be in and is good enough to be in, but the problem is the goddamn format is stupid. Like I said earlier, we have, for all of our waking lives, treated D1 CFB postseason as if it's some kind of special unicorn that needs a cutesie setup no other sport has. It doesn't. It doesn't need a shitty system like the BCS, and it doesn't fucking need a compressed playoff. It just needs a normal ass playoff like every. other. fucking. sports. has. The argument back in the BCS days against having a playoff at all was that having even one more game would be too much for teams and they would miss too many classes etc, which was obviously bullshit considering D2 had been doing it for decades no problem. Now the national champ will have played 16 games and no one bats an eye about it. Whoever proposed a 16 team format without G5 participants at all is right on the money. If we had that, then there is no discussion whatsoever. Texas would be in and we'd all be talking about who was favored over who, who is getting the most favorable matchups, etc etc instead of this nonsense conversation.
  16. Idk if he simulates or not but he has a predictor, as do most computer models.
  17. Find one of the computer models out there. Sagarin, CFB nerds, any of them. Find me one that shows Texas would be favored on a neutral field. We're going to end up being favored by 15 over BYU, give or take. Do you think you would be favored by that much or more? You wouldn't be. Flat out. Zero question. You'd be laying probably 6.5
  18. That's not a metric it's just a fact.
  19. Don't you put that evil on me Also you know exactly what I mean, and why I'm not interested at all in your subjective opinion. It's nothing personal, but I know you understand what I'm getting at.
  20. You understand that no one outside of UT fandom could possibly accept this as an objective take, right?
  21. I'm still waiting. You've given me nothing but completely subjective cope not backed up by any data whatsoever. Show me just one predictor that says Texas would be favored over just Tech alone on a neutral field, never mind the rest. I'll keep waiting. I'm fishing, and I really suck at fishing. I've got all day.
  22. I don't care what comes out of your brain, I asked you to show me what metric/data would back up your claim that you would beat or be favored over every other team above you (minus the obvious).
×
×
  • Create New...