Jump to content

chainsaw

Full Members
  • Posts

    10659
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

15162 Surly 1%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It would be fun to watch them travel to Lubbock and get their shit pushed in
  2. See, they tried running that in response to Charlie Kirk but the people didn't bite. The media tried very hard to make it happen, but it didn't.
  3. If we beat aggy they would need both Auburn (26.5% ESPN Analytics chance to win) and Mississippi State (21.6% ESPN Analytics chance to win) to upset Bama and Ole Miss, otherwise they will have been knocked out of the SEC championship. That comes out to an over 94% chance of being kept out of the SEC title game if aggy loses to us on Friday. Interesting to me, if aggy beats us, that would go a long way towards keeping Georgia out of the SEC title game (Bama would have the head to head and the higher cumulative opponent winning percentage), so bitchtit Kirby Smart probably will be rooting for us on Friday. This is how it works out, check my math. Week of Nov 26, teams at the top of the SEC standings: aggy (7-0) to play TEX (Nov 28) Georgia (7-1 [Bama]) done with Conference Play Ole Miss (6-1 [Georgia]) to play MISS ST (Nov 28) Alabama (6-1 [Oklahoma]) to play AUB (Nov 29) If Texas Wins: aggy 7-1 Georgia 7-1 Ole Miss 7-1 or 6-2 Alabama 7-1 or 6-2 That is four different outcomes: Only aggy and Georgia are 7-1 at the end of the weeek Both will advance to SEC championship game If all four teams are 7-1 Alabama and Georgia would play for SEC championship No complete round-robin No team has beaten all three of the other 7-1 teams No team has lost to all three of the other 7-1 teams There are no Common Conference Opponents among the four 7-1 teams The cumulative conference winning percentage method yields a clear first place team (Alabama) Texas A&M opponents' conference winning percentage: 28.125% to 29.69% Auburn (1-7 [lost to Bama because we are assuming Bama is 7-1]) Miss St (1-7 [lost to Ole Miss because we are assuming Ole Miss is 7-1]) Florida (2-6) Arkansas (1-7 or 0-8 [Mizzou]) LSU (4-4 or 3-5 [Oklahoma]) Mizzou (4-4 or 3-5 [Arkansas]) SCar (1-7) Texas (6-2) Georgia opponents' conference winning percentage: 46.875% to 48.44% Tenn (5-3 or 4-4 [Vandy]) Alabama (7-1) Kentucky (2-6) Auburn (1-7) Ole Miss (7-1) Florida (2-6) Miss St (1-7) Texas (6-2) Ole Miss opponents' conference winning percentage: 35.94% to 37.5% Kentucky (2-6) Arkansas (1-7 or 0-8 [Mizzou]) LSU (4-4 or 3-5 [Oklahoma]) Georgia (7-1) Oklahoma (6-2 or 5-3 [LSU]) SCar (1-7) Florida (2-6) Miss St (1-7) Alabama opponents' conference winning percentage: 50% to 51.56% Georgia (7-1) Vandy (6-2 or 5-3 [Tenn]) Mizzou (4-4 or 3-5 [Arkansas]) Tenn (5-3 or 4-4 [Vandy]) SCar (1-7) LSU (4-4 or 3-5 [Oklahoma]) Oklahoma (6-2 or 5-3 [LSU]) Auburn (1-7) Alabama's opponent would be determined by the procedure for resolving 3+ team ties for second place (Georgia, Ole Miss, Texas A&M) which would come down to cumulative conference winning percentage of all conference opponents (Georgia advances) No complete round robin among those three teams No team has beaten, nor lost to, both of the other two Georgia, Ole Miss, and Texas A&M have the same record (2-0) against Common Conference Opponents (Miss St, Florida) The cumulative conference winning percentage method yields a clear second place team (Georgia) Only Ole Miss loses this weekend Alabama and Georgia would play for SEC championship No complete round-robin No team has beaten both of the other 7-1 teams No team has lost to both of the other 7-1 teams There are no common conference opponents amount the three 7-1 teams The cumulative conference winning percentage method yields a clear first place team (Alabama) Alabama percentage unaffected by Ole Miss loss, Georgia percentage unaffected by Ole Miss loss because Miss St win offsets the effect, Texas A&M percentage too low even after adjusting upward for Miss St win Alabama's opponent would be determined by the procedure for resolving a two-team tie for second place (Texas A&M and Georgia) No h2h Common Opponents (Auburn [Even 2-0], Miss St [Even 2-0], Florida [Even 2-0], Texas [Adv Georgia, 1-1]) Georgia advances Only Alabama loses this weekend Georgia and Ole Miss would play for the SEC Championship No complete round-robin among Georgia, Texas A&M, and Ole Miss No team has beaten both of the other 7-1 teams No team has lost to both of the other 7-1 teams LSU is the only common opponent, who all three teams beat The cumulative conference winning percentage method yields a clear first place team (Georgia) Georgia's opponent would be determined by the procedure for resolving a two-team tie for second place (Texas A&M and Ole Miss) No h2h Same records versus Common Opponents (Miss St [2-0], Fla [2-0], Ark [2-0], LSU [2-0], SCar [2-0]) The cumulative conference winning percentage method yields a clear second place team (Ole Miss) Texas A&M opponents' conference winning percentage: 31.25% to 32.81% Auburn (2-6) Miss St (1-7) Florida (2-6) Arkansas (1-7 or 0-8 [Mizzou]) LSU (4-4 or 3-5 [Oklahoma]) Mizzou (4-4 or 3-5 [Arkansas]) SCar (1-7) Texas (6-2) Ole Miss opponents' conference winning percentage: 35.94% to 37.5% Kentucky (2-6) Arkansas (1-7 or 0-8 [Mizzou]) LSU (4-4 or 3-5 [Oklahoma]) Georgia (7-1) Oklahoma (6-2 or 5-3 [LSU]) SCar (1-7) Florida (2-6) Miss St (1-7)
  4. The American People are absolutely numb to stories like these.
  5. Instructions misinterpreted. Fapped to Elizabeth Hurley.
  6. You can sneak a lot of mediocrity into the beginning of the season because the fanbase is usually distracted by football
  7. Those cows are so unbothered
  8. That's what he looked like 16 years ago?? Damn
  9. Please don't talk about Epstein or high prices tomorrow.
  10. Hope he can contribute immediately. Welcome to the 40 Acres!
  11. This one is more or less the MTG demographic. TN-7 is intended to dilute the influence of some of the Nashville suburbs/exurbs in the same way GA-14 is intended to dilute some of the Atlanta suburbs/exurbs. Not surprised that the R is a batshit nutjob, that's by design and the way MAGAts usually win these districts. What do we know about Behn?
  12. Mitch has to work on his halftime adjustments, anticipating the other coach's halftime adjustments, and accounting for what the other team is going to do going into the third quarter. The team is always terrible in every aspect of the game for most of the third quarter. Too many times the Spurs are completely lacking an identity or even a discernible plan of action on offense, which is when you see Dev or others chucking bad shots and making unnecessarily risky passes. Turnovers and Effective Turnovers (shots so bad you might as well just hand the ball to the other team) are what swing the momentum so quickly against the Spurs, which means that on defense you're spending too much time defending fastbreaks (even harder to do without Castle) and even when there isn't a fast break the Spurs are overhelping so much that the opponent is basically guaranteed to find wide open perimeter shots. This is why, even in a league where a 15-point lead is the new 10-point lead, when it comes to the Spurs it truly feels like no lead is ever safe. They could be up 25 points at halftime, and it's still possible for the game to go down to the wire. There are several wins where the game was much closer than the final score would indicate, because the Spurs didn't really put them away until about two minutes left, after multiple lead changes, the Spurs go on like a 9-0 or 11-0 run or something like that. Some of these things will be easier to deal with when Wemby, Harper, and Castle are back, but it will be very evident against elite opponents even if the Spurs are at full strength. This is something Mitch needs to improve, and after seeing many games this season I don't think it can be fixed by experimenting with rotations alone.
  13. https://www.instagram.com/reels/DRUo0WUjXfr/
×
×
  • Create New...