Jump to content

bschoolprof

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    6080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

7286 Surly 1%

Recent Profile Visitors

7854 profile views
  1. jesus fucking christ dude, you don't know half as much as you think you do. Deloitte audits internal controls. Of medium to large public companies. You implied arrogantly that a similar private enterprise would not have better controls, and you are full of shit, your retort to which is for us to volunteer. ok.
  2. You are out of your element Donny. Deloitte did not audit internal controls for the city, like vendor payments. Public companies have to get internal control audits, not just financial statement audits.
  3. A for-profit entity, comparable in size and scope (~14,000 employees, $6 billion in spending per year)? Absolutely. They would have public debt/equity and their internal controls, not just their financials, would be audited by a big 4 firm.
  4. Not killing humans but instead infecting them with a virus that forces them to kill themselves slowly is some pretty silly moral gymnastics. I'd like it more if it ends up being a tongue and cheek satire of our own behavior atop the food chain ("These chicken got to lead a great, free-range life until we murdered them.") Something akin to our destruction as a species ending up as an asterik on a carton in an alien grocery store or warehouse, saying something like: "these inter-planetary resources were harvested ethically and responsibly."
  5. Next stop light pull up will be a little awkward. Sup bro?
  6. If they just want an empty earth with no humans, infecting everyone with a virus that, I don't know . . . just kills them, seems much more efficient.
  7. theories on the others' endgame in all this?
  8. Sark, you beautiful drunk bastard. We love you again. Until we have another bad game and lose.
  9. I had no idea those beer cans were gonna blow like that.
  10. The probability that at least one person wins a bonus prize is about 40%. Each person in line in the 1st 100 has a 10% chance of winning a big prize and a 90% chance of not winning the big prize. The probability of at least one person in the group winning the big prize is the inverse of nobody winning a big prize. Thus, the probability is 1-(.90)^5, which is about 40%.
  11. Some fed no doubt entrapped these dipshits. what a waste of time.
  12. what do you think are they talking about?
  13. The Peter Principle in action. Most head coaches perfectly exemplify the peter principle. And no I'm not talking about Sark banging AD employees or coeds.
×
×
  • Create New...