Everything posted by hpslugga
-
Critical Race Theory policy in hiring at UT
You don’t even know what it is, much less could you articulate a complete sentence to defend this feeble, garbled drivel.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Because cosplay is their game.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
You’d have to ask the original poster of the thread. Answers to the name @Parliament
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Nah, you ain’t about that life.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Rogan good, rest bad
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
You shouldn’t have used it because: 1. It was a case of incorrect usage 2. you haven’t the foggiest clue what “liberal” even is. Has absolutely nothing to do with how others felt about it and everything to do with its fractal wrongness. You want to jaw about everyone being hypersensitive and emotional, yet you’re sitting there displaying a textbook case of an emotional attachment to a belief in something that was disproven.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Who said you were? That’s make believe and pretend. You knew that. No, your whole “logic” about this is “if you say anything negative about Joe Rogan, you’re a liberal.” That’s extremely lacking in mental toughness in every conceivable facet about this. So yes, reducing it to “liberals in 2022” most certainly is a cop out because you’re grasping at straws to insist on credibility of a preposterous statement.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
That’s a pissy shit little cop out if I’ve ever seen one.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Watching posters here trying to re-shape the definition of ad hominem:
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Just stop. You ain’t about that life.
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
You’re being decitful
-
Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
They are. It’s a canard- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Aind dat manes dere attackin’ mah fraydumbs!!!- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Confused recipients tend to be confused by confused senders.- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Yeah but the COVID patients he convinced to take ivermectin get to shit their projectile diarrhea onto him.- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
And that’s what this is really about. This isn’t about free speech; this is about “let me say what I want and don’t make me look stupid for saying what I say.” That’s a freedom none of us have; and we shouldn’t have it either because it’s completely antithetical to free speech, which is a two-way street. You have the right to say what you want; I have the right to call you a fucking idiot for saying it. If one can’t understand that, kindly remove oneself from political discussion because clearly, one ain’t about that life.- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
“That’s not what I’ve read.” When you deal almost exclusively in circular argumentation with the explicit intent to route back to an assumed conclusion, that tends to happen.- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
If you let a doctor go on for 60/90/120 minutes about vaccines, masks, distancing, treatments, preventive care et al and the person that gave the doctor the mic says “well I just disagree with all that,” then the doctor just had the entire balance of his time wasted. And by whom? Some dipshit that wants to promote crazy ideas because…things? Yeah, ok that might be one person’s idea of a “just asking questions.” But it’s “just asking questions” in as much as ivermectin is a valid treatment for Covid-19.- Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
And there's a perfectly good reason for that: They cannot defend their positions on the merits. If they could do that, oh they definitely would do that. If Rogan didn't have anything to hide, and if he were an actual man, he would invite one of those doctors on his show for a two way conversation with a single standard. But Rogan doesn't do that, largely because when it comes to topics like this one, he's only interested in one-way conversation with double standards, and it's precisely because he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about. It's an eminently ignorable con.- Boo fucking hoo Ashli Babbitt
A substantial number of ignorant, bigoted, primitive, superstitious savages who haven’t the foggiest clue how the real world works concluded this was murder.- 2022 Texas Coaching/Support Staff Thread
It’s actually on Preston Road- Official Thread for Abortion Demagoguery
Except for North Koreanism in that it cares if any of those Kims die.- Tell me about ou
And I fully expect to read the following headline: ”Eric Dickerson finds duffel bag previously thought to be lost at Mustang Barbers, offers $1 million and a car to Bijan Robinson to transfer to SMU” - Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.
Football ...
Basketball ...
Baseball ...
Other Sports ...
Futbol ...
🤫995🤫 ...
Gambling ...
Movies & TV ...
Music ...
Hobbies ...
Lulz ...
Food & Travel
...
Daily Texan ...
Business & Markets ...
Cloak Room ...
Help ...
For Sale ...
Board Discussion ...
Advertise...
Tailgate Donations
Back to top