Jump to content

'stache

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    12395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by 'stache

  1. Coffee for sure, mixed with hurricanes and beignets.
  2. Dez caught it, fuk Rodgers.
  3. Now, imagine that Knigga is white. [/McConaughey]
  4. Next year is a big "if not this year when?" type year. I really didn't like the idea of throwing in a young newcomer at QB. Bowman will get all the snaps, almost the entirety of the offense around him will return, and we'll add depth since we didn't lose much in the portal. Yeah it'll be his 7th year, but he didn't play really at all for three years prior so improvement from the first to second year in a new system should be expected. He'll be better next year, I don't see any reason to doubt that.
  5. The guy who led us to 10 wins and a CCG appearance? Hell yeah I'll take him back. When he was good, he was pretty darn good. When he struggled, we weren't blocking well for the most part (also some footwork issues that hopefully can get fixed in the offseason). We kept most of the OL and offensive skill players and next year could be special. I'd rather roll with Bowman than hope Rangel or Flores break out. If nothing else, we won't monkey around with multiple QBs. A full offseason in the same system will be a good think. I expect him to be quite a bit better next year. At worse, he's a game manager who will have some unfortunate turnovers, but we dealt with that for the entirety of Spencer Sanders' career, and overcame them for the most part this season. Also, great Farley reference, he's got to at least have a few masters degrees after all this time.
  6. Damn, wanted it to be true.
  7. Lol, you're the one making up terms to justify being an abject moron.
  8. I want so bad for the Stephen Hawking's thing to be true. Please be true.
  9. I'm legitimately curious if conference championship games will continue. For the Big 12, probably, but for SEC and BIG who will get 3-4 teams in the playoff each most years? What's the incentive? Just more wear and tear and injury risk for a subordinate trophy.
  10. Based on the prior conversation, I think it's "Covid was fake, vaccines kill, all world leaders and physicians were lying, and only the really smart ones who watch Youtube a lot know the truth." If not that specifically, something just as dumb and involving tin foil hats.
  11. That was my question, was that a known reputation going back that far, I guess it was. Why did it take so long to hit the fan and lock him the fuck up?
  12. I knew nothing about Epstein until it hit the fan a few years ago. My sense is that he liked having rich and powerful friends. I never got the sense that all of them shared his pedo lifestyle. Was it well known all the way back while he was schmoozing the rich and famous? The Dershowitz stuff is about as serious as I've seen, he needs to fucking fry. I don't equate being horny with being a pedo, so gonna need more than a flight log to see Slick Willy that way (notwithstanding that the CR media has already made up its mind). Is there more to this that I'm missing (probably so which is why I ask) because outside of Dershowitz, this release seems pretty benign.
  13. “Branch Covidian” lol, hadn’t heard that one in a while. When you’re more aggy than a guy whose handle is literally Aggie, you might take a look in the mirror, lol.
  14. I'm pissed he got to bang Olivia Munn for several years, full wheelhouse. Rodgers is a nutter, but the stuff he's peddling is mainstream CR bs these days, so it is political to a large degree. I think Kimmel is pretty funny but have no real interest in following his show. I assume like every late night comedian he's had plenty of fodder with the former president, so again, clearly CR and political in this dispute. Fuck Rodgers, I hadn't really cared enough to follow his talking points, I recall he got cleared to take peyote or some shit in the desert to decide whether to return or retire. Weird, but whatever, I didn't really care. Then he ripped on Kelce for being in a vaccine commercial, that's all I need to know that he's a fucking moron and a CR personality.
  15. The two former presidents on the list is the least surprising revelation of all time.
  16. They had 70 check in a few times during the game specifically so that the D might be confused when it's someone else checking in as eligible in a big moment, like a game winning 2pt conversion. The hope is that the defense just assumes and doesn't pay attention to the announcement. That level of gamesmanship is fine in my opinion. Where they pushed the rule beyond gamesmanship is sending two guys to the ref, then has 70 approach the ref waving his hands, follows the ref as though he's reporting. The ref assumes he's the one reporting, announces it, and 68 is uncovered because he's not eligible. Even if 68 clearly said it was him reporting and the ref misheard or made an assumption, that's the risk you run with that bullshit. It's a game winning 2 pt conversion on the road, the crowd is loud as fuck, the play clock is moving, and the ref has to get into position in the back of the endzone. The deceit confused the ref in that situation, and the confusion was intentional. The NFL says the rule is literally to avoid deception on the defense. Campbell says he tried to deceive and is mad that the ref didn't help. Fuck him, fuck Detroit, and fuck the haters. https://www.totalprosports.com/nfl/nfl-video-reminding-teams-reporting-eligible-receiver/?fbclid=IwAR372WjWxsY4-h0SgmFQwjSJf3_rPN6G656V84YgFIxp28u38G_zFWHS5oQ
  17. The article refers to a "she," so Hilldog maybe? Enjoyed the beach while Slick Willie was doing his thang? It also has a quote that these three are being withheld because they "did nothing wrong." I'm not following this close enough to know what the list is other than people who took the jet to the island, the vast majority of which we can assume was there for the bad stuff.
  18. Yup. They played a game and it didn’t work. What pisses me off the most is that they keep saying that Campbell told the refs before the game what they would do. As if the refs are required to help you deceive the defense. The whole point of the “check in” rule is literally to avoid deceit so the defense knows who to cover. The refs have a ton to do between plays and he had to get into position. And ultimately the offense heard the check in just like the defense did over the PA. Either correct it or roll with the play knowing he’s ineligible (if there’s not enough time to correct that’s your fault for trying to deceive and it not working). This whole “controversy” is pissing me off. I had sort of a soft spot for Detroit but no more as long as meathead Campbell is HC. Accept the risk that your deception might not work. Instead he cried like a bitch and blamed the ref. Fuck him and his players.
  19. And literally none of them react like “hey ref it’s me.” Refs correct shit all the fucking time when asked. They tried to confuse the d and instead confused the ref. That’s on them. Send 68 to report alone. But that wasn’t the point. Tried too hard and fucked it up. Haters delight.
  20. Also, I think the refs have been really bad, but I don’t think they are being biased towards any team or lying about their interpretations. That’s a federal fucking crime, see Tim Donaghy. I sure as fuck think Campbell and his players who pre planned a scheme to trick the defense using the ref as a pawn are lying about the play when it didn’t work.
  21. “Hey ref, later in the game we might use you to cause confusion.” I’d ignore his ass too. If you want a player to report then have him approach and report. If I’m a ref I’m not going out of my way to help him cause confusion. Fuck that meathead fuck.
  22. Why do three linemen approach the official? Why does Campbell feel the need to supposedly tell the official before the game and at halftime that he’s going to have a lineman report as eligible? Did he tell the ref “I’m going to send three guys to you and one will report as eligible?” Of course not, and if he tell the ref “I’m going to have 68 report as eligible” the ref thinks uh, ok, just have him approach and report. They tried to trick both the refs and the defense. They fucked it up. Everyone knows the refs are struggling this year. Campbell tries to take advantage by having three guys approach unnecessarily. Just send 68 to report and it gets done. Seriously. Fuck Campbell and fuck the haters.
  23. I think they planned to get away with something in a way that if they got caught they could claim controversy. I just don’t see how he’s an eligible receiver from where he line up, even if he reported. They had him go to the ref specifically so they could pretend he “reported” even though he knew he couldn’t become eligible by declaring it like Michael Scott “declaring” bankruptcy.
  24. Unless someone can explain this away, I’m convinced he was ineligible. Again, you can’t just declare yourself eligible and be eligible. The point of reporting is because the number on your jersey is otherwise ineligible. You still have to line up as an eligible receiver. Every time I’ve seen that is because they put a lineman in as a tight end and they have to report to let the defense know that a guy wearing 68 is playing a position that usually wears a number in the 80s. I think they tried to play a cute game and got caught, I need a good explanation to believe otherwise. Just approaching the ref isn’t enough even if you claim you called yourself eligible. Yet again, if that was the rule, why wouldn’t every lineman “declare” themselves eligible on every play? I feel like the commentators are ignoring this for the exposure of controversy.
×
×
  • Create New...