Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    13522
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

BurntEyes last won the day on January 4

BurntEyes had the most liked content!

Reputation

12219 Surly 1%

About BurntEyes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Well, you could just try posting content discussion about the game rather than bitching about content you don't like in the thread.
  2. You mock others for wasting their time arguing fruitless points. Yet, here you are, on a college football forum, writing a long post explaining why people shouldn't bother discussing one of the most central points of online college football talk since the internet was invented by Al Gore. You should find some Anime forums and tell them why focusing their attention on cartoons and debating which is best is a massive waste of time.
  3. And a victory over OSU and Oregon.
  4. Yeah but our "great" coach prior was Butter Teeth and Coach Swip Swap Swill post. Maybe hire someone who has a winning track record at the P4 level consistently. Not sure why Texas decision makers always need the the redemption arch or hottest new unproven.
  5. My entire point is we have fuck all to do with the shitty choices Texas decision makers have regarding head coaches. Further, that Cignetti's resume prior was better, longer and more complete than any of the last 3 Texas hires and suprise, suprise his next step was better too. Would I have seen it as a better hire, yes. Would he have been my top choice, no. Would it have been preferable to any of the last 3, yes. I didn't bring up the topic in this thread, feel free to go back and find who did and complain to them. @BurntOrange&White nailed it.
  6. As opposed to say, a guy who averaged 7-6 for 5 years at Washington and went 9-4 in his single full season at USC before being let go the next year mid season. You're right, no way Cignetti's resume would stack up to that level of domination. 53-17 at IUP (.757 winning %) 47-9 at JMU (.840 winning %) Surely he'd fail at the P4 level: 23-2 at IU for a .920 winning % bringing him to a lifetime of .785 No way!!! But coach Cougar High in the AAC to 22-4 (84.6%), that's a sure fire coaching hire. OR going 37-15 (71.2 wp) at Louisville in the power house ACC for your complete HC resume is plenty. Your post is stupid and you should feel bad for posting it.
  7. You might want to check the Sark thread and late in the Arch thread. There is now a divide of back to back CFPs put it on the wall, better than Herman or Strong, and we can't do any better vs the math and behaviors compared against any equal level spenders doesn't work out, the plans are shitty, the position coaches suck and we need better results group. So, pretty much like every time Texas makes a bad football HC hire there is the fear of change head in the sand, rah rah support your coach and the our coach is not good divisions. It takes absolute failure for the yay team guys to see the light, every time. No amount of data will sway them.
  8. Honestly, it's rape the brand for any and all value. Drive football and any other sports brand equity as high as possible, lots and lots of "remote" learning, get rid of any and all expensive employees that don't deliver additional revenue directly or aren't marketable, then when it's dry, sell it back to the state or let it fold. Expect to see University of Utah remote learning adds during games, lots of roster turn over, and coaching changes as deemed necessary.
  9. This is unfortunately the truth, basically do whatever the fuck you want. No need to stay consistent or even logical. Apply rules when you feel like it or it helps your personal agenda or don't as you see fit. Logic and reason need not apply and if at all possible you should neglect some deserving teams in order to include multiple G5s because nobody gives a shit about the games they will play in the CFP. This isn't about money or logic, it's about agendas and stupidity. The more the better. With TONS of Regards, The morons who designed this cluster fuck. @notre dame joe Your biggest beef should be with G5 or with your athletics department for not joining one of those also ran conferences.
  10. Basically, yes.
  11. I think it's rational to think that had aggie lost to only ND and Texas they would be out and Texas and ND both would be in. The ND win held aggie in the top 10 all season. They lose they run to Texas they are in the top 10, just. The Texas loss puts them at 12-15 and Texas at 11 or 12.
  12. I wanna know why ND hasn't picked a fight with Ole Miss. If there is one team that could have gotten moved out and nobody buy Ole Miss fans would have been upset about, it's them. FSU lost a QB and they were out. Ole Miss lost their HC and all the offensive staff, but they remain. That's the oddest one of the committee insanity, imo.
  13. I concur that Magic Hat was more qualified for a playoff spot than PedoMotherMary. Ive not closely examined BYU vs Bama but you're absolutely correct the committee fucked them while protecting Bama. Maybe at some point the one guy who'd been yelling about TV dollars in the back of the room and why G5 sucked resonated with the idiots and they thought, gotta keep Sankey happy and Bama is good for the pocket books.
  14. I honestly think part of Vanderbilt's investments in football was their ability to forecast this issue specifically. They've always been a good baseball school. They know the SEC tie in helps. Being THE football bottom feeder had future potential financial and sports implications. Interestingly, in Nashville I think I see more Preds gear than Titans gear and there are more women interested in those game, minor league baseball and Vandy than Titans, at least according to my dating profile research and attention draw goes.
×
×
  • Create New...