Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    11235
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by BurntEyes

  1. I didnt claim it was illegal. What I took issue with taking a moral high ground based on political team. He abused a massive position of power over a way younger female. It's absolutely shit behavior and were it George Bush or any republican aligned politician his view would be extremely different. Hell, were it random CEO and an intern it would be. It's absolutely a double standard based on politic team. Further, we know for a fact he did abuse his position and Monica. Right now, we can’t say the same for Trump though I certainly believe he is, it's not fact.
  2. She was a 22 y/o intern, he was a 49 POTUS. To minimize that behavior then and now by using a fautly comparison is absolutely shit. Not to mention it is well know Bill had a ton of engagement with Epstein as well. Diminishing one abuse of power by a POTUS by comparing the alleged shit behavior of another justifies bad behavior because one of them were on your team. Its shit and you should stop. It's not news nor discussion of News. Its yay team political bullshit.
  3. Well, I don't buy into the starved into quitting, because I'm firmly of the belief that coup/assassination is the only way Putin stops. That said, it's absolutely fuel to the fire of both the Military and Oligarchs that would throw said coup/assassination. A hungry people is VERY bad for both.
  4. Powerful quake in Russia's Far East causes tsunami, Japan and Hawaii order evacuations - Reuters Link Net - Out Hawaii posters need to stop messing around and GTFO if you're in a low lying area. Russia is saying "Nothing to see here." Forgive me if I am skeptical of the Russian reporting on Telegram.
  5. That sadly doesn't suprise me and in all that the video of Epstein's cell DOOR has not been provided. This was a common area. So not only what they provided almost certainly doctored, they aren't providing the most important video.
  6. Why do you hate Ed Wood? Ive not seem this film, so can't compare but I did watch Alone in the Dark. So I will raise your bet. I'm a Slater junkie and will watch pretty much anything he is in. I enjoy some horror and I'm a game nerd to a degree. Texas was on its way to winning a national championship, I'd just gotten a big promotion, and this seemed right in my wheel house. It. WAS. NOT. IMDB Link
  7. Take it up with Reuters and 2022.
  8. We could recruit the racist who are starting "colonies" and tell them we are giving them their own planet.
  9. What you did there, I seent it.
  10. Epstein employed "hosts" for his guests on his properties. Chefs, waiters, hostest, etc etc. were all legally employed by Epstein. At the surface it is 100% legal. Trump claimed in that video above: "...he stole people that worked for me." Implying that employees that worked for Trump were stolen by Epstein. He doesn't clarify who they were, I just used the young female as a hypothetical example to dispute your point that they wouldn't fight over an employee. They absolutely would. Of course Trump is not going to be specific about the employee(s). Frankly, I don't believe a word of it anyways. He's generating a story to explain why they stopped talking.
  11. I'm not about to defend Trump or his story as being true. However, in a hypothetical you have 2 absolute ego maniacs that that, I think most would agree, view women as property. If Trump had a favorite "piece of property" at MarALago and an egomaniacal "competitor" "stole" that property, I can absolutely see it causing rift. Again, I'm not supporting the truth or accuracy of the story, but to say those two wouldn't fight over such a "possession" is to misunderstand their mindset.
  12. Trump sets deadline of 10 or 12 days for Russia on war with Ukraine - Reuters Link
  13. I am Jack's quickly growing group source ban.
  14. Colorado fans in broad strokes are insufferable. Not in an aggie/pig/tiegaw sort of way, more USC fan sort of way.
  15. For sure, it isn't pure fiction. Rankings will rise and fall based not only for who a recruit commits to but who is interested. Yes, part of that is a coaching staff's historical ability to develop talent, but in my admittedly incomplete knowledge it's more about evaluating talent. I'm certain I don’t need to address that reality regarding FUPM, particularly as it relates to QB. FUPM had amazing skills of not only underdeveloping recruits but towards the end he was mailing in the evaluations too.
  16. ..and his name was Albert Einstein!
  17. This is Surly, semantic arguments are part and parcel of the foundations upon which we exist. The more nuanced and trivial the more critical. Don't tell me what to do!!!
  18. Well, I sadly expect that as a given.
  19. Missed this informative and in depth perspective. However, its clear he hasn't consulted with the space lizards and as such, he's missing a huge part of the picture. This is really just all a smoke screen to keep we informed from focusing on exposing the flat earth reality. Did you know that Bigfoot is real, but not what people think. They actually serve as the Men In Black in remote locations where seeing the flat reality of earth is far more likely. They disappear people who find the ice walls.
  20. Right! We have to think of the children!
  21. Dude in purple couldn't be bothered to put down his cigar and kept approaching the line of fire. I'm glad they stopped this guy, truly, but nuance matters. Maybe your cigar should be prioritized behind the ability to use your other hand when approaching at guy with a knife. It's one thing to bring a knife to a gun fight, its another to get in the middle of one... with a cigar.
  22. I'm sure somewhere in her social media bio she will note the University for which she works. Her sociological history work is top notch and I'm sure she's well published too. I'm quite curious about her work justifying NAMBLA against Greek Society's normative behavior. We all know, if it happened in the past, norms at the current time were different and made the behavior completely acceptable even in modern normative morals. I don't recall anyone taking issue with pedophilia in the 1990s. Right?
  23. Just checking. It is Surly and well...
  24. Agree with almost all of this. Late night like Johnny, Letterman etc were build on a foundation of 3 items. 1) Endorsement of upcoming movies via interviews 2) Various Skits by the host. 3) Guest appearances which were 95% comprised of comics and musicians. Yes, there were rare occasions where the Animal person or others would come on but mostly it was bands or comics being promoted. Today #1 is so grossly over covered by social media, main stream media and other that it has become completely superfluous. People would watch to "get to know" the actors and then see a trailer of the upcoming film. People all have a "direct relationship" with their favorite stars these days via social media and have almost always already seen a trailer long before they appear on a late night talk show. Nothing new is occurring unless it is olds (over 60) who don't really use social media. On Skits and stand up comedians/bands or #2 and #3 there are truly endless skit type and music promotion options on YouTube, social media, streaming services and main stream. I find far more new comedic and music acts through my carefully curated and extremely limited social media. I pretty much only like and follow artist, musicians and comedians. If they go to extensive political post I unfollow them. Not that I object to them having a political stance at all, I'm just not interested in theirs. I'm only interested in their art. On top of all that, someone noted it upstream that if you want the highlights of Colbert you can get them on social media/YouTube without having to sit through all the filler, so why tune in? The point of all that is at this point there is zero need or value of late night talk shows in today's digital media environment for 95% of the population. More unique shows like Comedians in Cars, John Mulaney Presents and My Next Guest fills a niche of getting to know celebrities in a seamingly more genuine less promotional method. They have a bit of skit but not a ton. Net is there are SO many different sources to get the 3 components of late night that it's time has passed. It's over. Go home.
  25. Is this sarcasm? Cause, the exact opposite is the reality.
×
×
  • Create New...