Jump to content

wild_turkey

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

wild_turkey last won the day on January 27 2020

wild_turkey had the most liked content!

Reputation

4689 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I’m a lifelong Dodgers fan but it won’t bother me.
  2. This email went out from Jim Davis this afternoon: Sorry if formatting is weird, pasting from my phone. It doesn’t mention the compact, which could be a sign they are planning to ignore it and hope it fizzles out and a formal decision is never required. Unfortunately, that may be the best case scenario for UT at this point, given the players involved. I am concerned that he mentions “The University of Texas at Austin will serve as a model for restoring public trust in higher education.“ The public already trusted higher education until people deliberately tried to destroy that trust with lies. UT Austin should not even feel the need to acknowledge public distrust and give these ridiculous ideas any credibility. To do so is to suggest the university has gone astray and will now fix the role it played in causing this fictitious problem. Mostly, I remain worried that this is the way of breaking news softly, before later revealing that we agreed to a modified compact, which would still be 100% bullshit.
  3. If you had told me 2 years ago that we would be preseason #1 with a Heisman favorite QB and that by October we would be a struggling 5-2 and hoping our QB gets benched…. and that the state of Texas football would be very low on my list of concerns, I would also think that is insane.
  4. As I was participating in my local protest, it occurred to me how surreal it was for me to be involved in a political protest, and how bad things must be for that entire scenario to unfold. If you had told me 2 years ago that I would choose to do that on a fall Saturday, I would’ve thought it was insane. Then it occurred to me, what level of insanity will transpire over the next 1-2 years, and what currently unfathomable situation will we all find ourselves in by 2027? It’s a scary thought experiment.
  5. Pete on the left is twice divorced, cheated on his first wife multiple times by his own admission, cheated on his second wife as evidenced by the child he has with his now third wife, has been formally accused of sexual assault with at least one woman and agreed to a financial settlement to silence her, and is an alcoholic who was frequently drunk at work. In his current role, notable accomplishments include accidentally texting military plans to journalists with no security clearance. Pete on the right is…gay. And to make him look bad, there is a very poorly photoshopped image of him breast feeding. This is junior high bullshit. The entire Trump family is morally bankrupt. Imagine one of Obama’s kids making that post. The country would melt down, but now it’s just another day in America.
  6. I think the people with the most power are not Christian nationalists, but they allow Christian nationalists beneath them to push the agenda because it sows division in the common people and division benefits the oligarchs. Trump doesn’t give 2 shits about Christianity. Neither does Elon or Adelson or many of his other billionaire supporters. Christian nationalism is merely a tool they can use when they need it, and otherwise allow it to fester and give their political allies something to whine about.. The white supremacy part is entirely valid at the very top and throughout parts of the GOP.
  7. Your summarization is incomplete and the devil is in the details. Here is the full text of the compact: https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/4059a5dd-f3dc-4cf6-bf1f-9e0d98c2f8d9.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_8 For starters, it should be rejected on principal. The federal government, and in particular, a highly partisan and biased presidential administration, should not be overseeing the ideas that can and can’t be taught on a university campus. Look at the shitstorm that A&M just went through for a professor discussing gender in the classroom, and now imagine that the federal government has a signed agreement that gives them authority over this or they withdraw research funding. Secondly, this specific presidential administration is not a reliable negotiator or business partner. The entire tariff debacle should be plain evidence of that. Even if the university felt the demands of the compact were reasonable, Trump has proven time and again that he will change his mind on a whim. There is no reason to willingly enter a formal agreement with him if it can be avoided. Thirdly, the DOJ is responsible for enforcing it. The same DOJ that is currently being used to prosecute Trump’s political enemies. In its current form, this is not a fair or reliable mediator for the compact. It is a weapon that can and will be used by Trump if the university does anything that he is not happy about. And if you want to get further into the language of the compact, the biggest concern I have is section 2 - Marketplace of Ideas & Civil Discourse. This notion of an intellectually open campus environment already exists at UT Austin, so it is a boogeyman request that suggests the curriculum is intentionally designed to persecute conservative ideas. It creates protections specifically for conservative ideas, while failing to provide any similar reciprocal protections for progressive ideas. Conservative ideas don’t need the government to protect them. If they are less prominent at UT Austin compare to a place like A&M or Tech, that is merely the nature of the university and the students and faculty it has attracted for decades. It is not an evil scheme to indoctrinate otherwise innocent conservative young adults. If families or students are afraid of that, they have every opportunity to select a different university in the first place, rather than allow the government to create a mechanism to homogenize all education and restrict the expression of ideas within academia. In normal times, I would feel strongly the same way if a Democrat president wanted to meddle in A&M’s curriculum and force them to become more progressive under the notion that progressive ideas are unfairly targeted. Finally, the language in some key areas is intentionally vague, leaving it open to interpretation and therefore weaponization. What does it mean to “abolish institutional units that purposefully punish or belittle conservative ideas?” Who defines what constitutes as belittling? If a professor discusses climate change and a conservative student gets offended, what happens? If a professor teaches that Tylenol and circumcision do not actually cause Autism, and a MAHA nutjob gets offended and feels belittled, do we lose the professor? Why would any self-respecting professor choose to teach in that environment?
  8. Your summarization is incomplete and the devil is in the details. Here is the full text of the compact: https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/4059a5dd-f3dc-4cf6-bf1f-9e0d98c2f8d9.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_8 For starters, it should be rejected on principal. The federal government, and in particular, a highly partisan and biased presidential administration, should not be overseeing the ideas that can and can’t be taught on a university campus. Look at the shitstorm that A&M just went through for a professor discussing gender in the classroom, and now imagine that the federal government has a signed agreement that gives them authority over this or they withdraw research funding. Secondly, this specific presidential administration is not a reliable negotiator or business partner. The entire tariff debacle should be plain evidence of that. Even if the university felt the demands of the compact were reasonable, Trump has proven time and again that he will change his mind on a whim. There is no reason to willingly enter a formal agreement with him if it can be avoided. Thirdly, the DOJ is responsible for enforcing it. The same DOJ that is currently being used to prosecute Trump’s political enemies. In its current form, this is not a fair or reliable mediator for the compact. It is a weapon that can and will be used by Trump if the university does anything that he is not happy about. And if you want to get further into the language of the compact, the biggest concern I have is section 2 - Marketplace of Ideas & Civil Discourse. This notion of an intellectually open campus environment already exists at UT Austin, so it is a boogeyman request that suggests the curriculum is intentionally designed to persecute conservative ideas. It creates protections specifically for conservative ideas, while failing to provide any similar reciprocal protections for progressive ideas. Conservative ideas don’t need the government to protect them. If they are less prominent at UT Austin compare to a place like A&M or Tech, that is merely the nature of the university and the students and faculty it has attracted for decades. It is not an evil scheme to indoctrinate otherwise innocent conservative young adults. If families or students are afraid of that, they have every opportunity to select a different university in the first place, rather than allow the government to create a mechanism to homogenize all education and restrict the expression of ideas within academia. In normal times, I would feel strongly the same way if a Democrat president wanted to meddle in A&M’s curriculum and force them to become more progressive under the notion that progressive ideas are unfairly targeted. Finally, the language in some key areas is intentionally vague, leaving it open to interpretation and therefore weaponization. What does it mean to “abolish institutional units that purposefully punish or belittle conservative ideas?” Who defines what constitutes as belittling? If a professor discusses climate change and a conservative student gets offended, what happens? If a professor teaches that Tylenol and circumcision do not actually cause Autism, and a MAHA nutjob gets offended and feels belittled, do we lose the professor? Why would any self-respecting professor choose to teach in that environment?
  9. The king is Jesus and the president “has been willing to say it”, right before he posted an AI scat porn video of himself wearing a crown and flying a plane that says King Trump on it. Definitely a guy who believes Christ the King. Oh, but it’s the Marxist and Islamic Democrats who are dividing this country. He should throw Antifa in there for completeness.
  10. We must end indoctrination and return to fundamentals of education at all levels. Also, please hang this poster of the 10 Commandments in every public school classroom from K-12.
  11. Woke up and ran 13.1 miles. Weather was nice. Legs felt good. Ate a breakfast burrito and a protein shake. And coffee. Black. Went to daughter’s dance class. Love it there. It’s pure and innocent. Totally insulated from adult problems. Went to No Kings and marched ~2 miles. Got rained on. Held my sign and chanted. It was great. FDT. Rested and reflected. Browsed flights to Europe. Carved a pumpkin with kiddo. Her first jack-o’-lantern. Drank a beer and an espresso and a coke zero. Made a beef carpaccio and drank some bourgogne blanc. There were olives involved. Texas football was a wet fart on our day. I muted it to play music. Gilroy? Tell me who wins. Kiddo went to bed. Je t’aime et bonne nuit. Made a vol-au-vent with veal and filet de boeuf. It slammed and went hard. Watched a movie. Yahoo sports popup says we won. Okay, cool, hook’em. But don’t sign that fucking compact or I’m out. Drank a bottle of Chateauneuf-du-pape and a bottle of bourgogne rouge. And some crystal light to keep it classy. Had sex with the wife. More than once. Two or three times. It’s fluid. Maybe I’ll run the other half when the sun comes up in a few hours. Or just brunch. That also sounds nice and easier. Fuck that cheeto pedophile fascist racist rapist insurrectionist motherfucker and everyone who supports him. We’re not done here.
  12. Went to the Fort Worth event. There were a ton of people, great signs, great energy, lots of noise. It rained hard at the start of the march and no one left for cover. Everything I saw was peaceful. I was solo due to wife staying home with kiddo. I knew a couple people there but impossible to find them in the crowd and the weather. I was very happy to have a chance encounter with someone I recently met and now knowing that commonality exists. I need more of this type of person in my life. News says about 6,000 people were there. Proud of this city despite being a more conservative city within this red state.
  13. What a game by Ohtani.
  14. I like that. It’s edgy and unique. Maybe drop the Apple logo since it’s getting dated and just focus on the name alone.
×
×
  • Create New...