I have and I strongly disagree.
There's no fucking nipples on the bat suit or gratuitous shots of Batman's ass; there also aren't cheeseball villains prancing around and making stupid jokey jokes all the way through the movie.
Everybody calls those first two films "campy" just because they aren't (more or less) grounded in reality like the Nolan films. Here's the thing - they weren't *trying* to be realistic. Burton was trying to make a live action version of a comic book, and he achieved that brilliantly. Some of the VFX don't hold up super well because they were late 80s/early 90s vintage, but otherwise the visual fabric, themes, cinematography, fantastic score and great cast hold up very well in both films.
The Schumaker films are candy-coated, campy pieces of shit and shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as the Burton films. Go re-watch Batman & Robin and then watch Batman Returns right after and tell me if the two are even in the same fucking zip code. They are completely different in almost every way except for the fact that they are both "Batman" films.