Jump to content

Hagbard Celine

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    15121
  • Joined

Everything posted by Hagbard Celine

  1. although he is retiring from broadcasting this weekend with his 40th call at the masters, the football forum is more appropriate for his sendoff given his association with the rise of the local sports reporter as symbiotic with the franchise he (now he/she) covered the most obscure lundquist fact: he was featured on the cover of the 1st edition of the book of the subgenius in 1983: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_SubGenius
  2. a perfect example of aglogic and agspeak.... https://www.kbtx.com/2024/04/11/families-reflect-potential-return-aggie-bonfire-am-campus/ here's the closing paragraph (emphasis mine) +++ "Despite the differing perspectives there is a shared sentiment among these families that the revival of Aggie Bonfire, if undertaken, will entail significant changes and challenges. They express hope that the committee tasked with this decision will address their concerns effectively and navigate the complexities to ensure a meaningful and safe experience for all involved. "The committee has a difficult job addressing all the concerns and hopefully they’ll be able to resolve the issues and be able to proceed with the new bonfire experience,” said Richard. Texas A&M University has confirmed that no action has been taken regarding the regent’s proposal to bring back the bonfire. Any potential reinstatement would need to adhere to the university’s settlement agreement with the affected families, which includes provisions for professional oversight to ensure safety and accountability." +++ The differing perspectives are from the parent(s) of 3 of the dead That's it 3 differing perspectives 2 of those parent(s) want the stack back with university control. The other is concerned about the return of the stack WITH TOO MUCH ADMINISTRATION INTERFERENCE And that's it. That's the full rundown of the "complexities" which will have to be "navigated" That last paragraph is like reading the aggy version of NewSpeak. Then, in the last sentence we see something I have never seen in print or in video: in order for the return of stack, aggy (allegedly) negotiated provisions for professional oversight in the settlement agreement (which one?) with the families (which ones?) Thus begins the quest which may result in the need to "file a freedom of information" (TM-texags 2024) Does anyone have access to or a copy of the document(s) defining these "negotiated provisions"????????? here's the full article spoiled but you can skip ahead to the next spoiled article because, wait, there's moar! game on, birches search: <aggy bonfire settlement agreement with families> result 1: the above article result 2: the below article, first published 081029, but updated ELEVEN YEARS later 191212 (hmmmm.....) https://myaggienation.com/archive/bonfire-lawsuit-settled/article_9b56ce78-f3c1-11e2-8b9a-001a4bcf887a.html (emphasis mine) there are 10 different tangents in that article from 15 years ago that need discussion i don't remember reading that article although i'm sure in 2009 during the heyday of Shag1 it was probably posted but no one gave a shit because the 2002 report that cited institutional juvenile delusion and a culture of obsession seemed to have put to bed forever the idea of killing more kids the immediate segue from the kbtx article 2 das ago is this: i want to see these alleged provisions for professional oversight to ensure safety and accountability supposedly memorialized 15 years ago in the university’s settlement agreement with the affected families that would likely require a fully public disclosure of a legal settlement in court 15 years ago between citizens and a public university which should be public and accessible game on, birches
  3. he's a pefect fit for the rig12 damn good thing we won
  4. just now able to post what in the everloving fuckk was that shit in the top of the 4th MOTHER FUCKERS just make it obvious you are trying to keep the cheaters alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
  5. au contraire i thougt arsenal played to this level you went out last year in the europa 16 this is a big step up and you looked the part the question is digesting this continued run while Herr Klopp stays tanned rested and ready (same for city - but they are used to it)
  6. anyone in dallas - the londoner in addison is always hopping for arsenal fixtures - next week will be smashing
  7. saka initiated sorryy gunners - he got it right
  8. someone smarter than me needs to capture this series of images and make a .gif load it right now and you can see the giant 1000-mile wide blob of darkness travel through texas pretty incredible https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/sector_band.php?sat=G16&sector=sp&band=01&length=24
  9. cloud dissipation theory debunked clouds slowed down and a big fat fucker at 5000' moved in right at totality i got 3 seconds of beads up front then it finally cleared right at the end in time to get 30 seconds of venus then the diamond ring and a few more beads no flares, no ring of fire, no stars, and less than 10 seconds of complete unobstructed totality but i got the diamond ring pictures do no justice to the depth of field and peripheral vision of the human eye maybe australia is in the cards silver medal in the venus 'n jupiter competition
  10. first pic with jupiter (left) and venus (right) #winning
  11. that's called bailey's beads and is not created by clouds but rather sunlight bouncing through lunar craters and valleys
  12. 1816z totality in coahuila it's been real folks don't look up!
  13. the coastal flow looks to be stalling out if not slightly retreating from SA
  14. here's the satlink again - choose the first link - geocolor animation loops and you can get a feel for all 3 layers and how they are moving https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/sector.php?sat=G16&sector=sp
  15. watching the loop, hill country has a chance SA and southwest look to be 100% negatory
  16. shit out west means fuckall for showtime lowlevel blob south of metroplex is shrinking!
  17. fox 4 just showed a probability index for the metroplex that was not favorable
×
×
  • Create New...