in what context?
he was the leader of briggy's b'hoys and was in command of the aiken party job
@Pods well done and thanks for taking the time to write that post
you pretty much covered most of what i would have said
a couple of additions:
- the under-18 questions are a remnant of the 1856 reformation catechism
- the brethren concept of "lying for the lord' is a neuron-pattern duplication of magat 'alternative facts' - there is a reason the brethren are 99% red
- the comment from the wife in the re-baptism tweet, "the church is true", is an exact corollary to the ted koppel statement about fox: their audience is fact-toxic and seeks ideological confirmation bias - and breaking that spell is sudden and traumatic
- the $32B is from ancestry.com; the church has been compiling a genealogy of the entire anglo race for 150 years because when they get a convert they then baptize the souls of all of that living convert's ancestors in one of these:
the advent of the intertrons created a cunnning plan: charge every person doinig genealogical research $350/year to keep their account "open"
voila: $32 BILLION
and last but not least, brig ordered the mountain meadows job when eleanor mcclean pointed the finger at the fancher party camped in pioneer square; juanita suspected it, bigler didn't want to believe it, and bagley stands unrefuted