Cite?
What controls in a claim of self-defense is whether the killer reasonably perceived that he was being threatened with an unlawful imminent deadly force attack. One doesn't need to be correct in that perception; one merely needs to be reasonable in that perception.
The issue in this case is whether the killer was the initial aggressor, which, if proven, would prevent the use self-defense by the shooter.
In 25+ years of litigating, that's not the way it works.
As for the Judge's "algo" fear - when creating images from raw data, an algorithm is used to create the "original" photo representation.
If algorithms are the judge's issue, no digital photos could be admitted under his reasoning.
According to this judge's reasoning, the first photo is admissible (even though it had to be enhanced using an algorithm to convert from raw data into a photo). The second photo is not admissible according to this judge (because it used an algorithm to both covert it from raw data and to "lighten" the image to show detail).
Works for me. I will go back to Elmo:
Until they don't.
Dollar holding strong. Fed Juicer still juicing. Asset bubbles inflated.
$105 billion from Nov to Dec;
$90 billion in a month from Dec to Jan; . . .
Eluding me as well (other than Constitutional Amendment, of course).
At the very least, the Kenosha Police should have had a chat with the boy rather than giving him water and sending him towards the "rioters." That is poor procedure. The boy was walking bait for a violent encounter (in self-defense, as an attack or both).
Boy got sucked into the Fox, et. al, media silo. Culty dumb actions ensued. Repeat and rinse.
The Fed taper is about to begin.
The Fed Plan - reduce the $120 billion a month in purchases by $15 billion each month. (No cold turkey detox for the hogs addicted to the brrrt juice; cold turkey might kill the patient).
Apparently - anyone would have been justified to kill him since his Combat-Inspired-Cosmetic-Effects AK-47 could cause fear of death. Self-defense, after all, works both ways.