Jump to content

dcar00

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    39714
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

18914 Surly 1%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This is absolutely happening re: Bama and I believe it will be part of the equation re: Miami. the problem with an ugly loss to UGA for Bama is that they already beat UGA at UGA. Also in regards to Klatt. It's good but you notice he never talks about SOS at all on the criteria(he talks about our OOC kinda). Why? because that is UGLY for tOSU and Indiana. He also doesn't talk about teams wins against playoff teams or top 15-20. All these guys need to stop talking about picking the best 12. They are picking the best 7(or Best 6 + Notre Dame). The other 5 are picked for them. I think it is highly like that Bama and Miami are in and Texas and ND are out and the committee can say see we are about best teams and not about who brings the most eyeballs.
  2. I want to see Wilcher's minutes increase in place of Mark. I wish Weaver could dribble worth a shit because I'd like to see him over Pope. If Miller can't create open looks for Heide, Heide is worthless. Do we have a big man coach for Vok? He needs someone working with him day and night on his moves and positioning in the post.
  3. oh it's Miller time alright...ugly
  4. certainly there is some randomness. what they really want is helmet schools to schedule each other to drive viewers. could those helmet schools suck that year? Yes possible but if it is early in the year everyone is excited and the helmet schools will likely be ranked(not that it is fair, it is just what it is). the portal will increase the potential randomness. basically the only thing I have seen the committee give a shit about as it relates to big ten and sec, other than losses, is H2H and that is only really when they are significantly forced to consider it. they have to because it involves a win or a loss and not a "metric" but it only involves "tied" teams. They could really screw the pooch with their considerations a) the Texas OSU OOC game and b) H2H(Miami/ND). they already don't give a shit about SOS. common opponents seems fucked as well. Texas 2-0 vs 1-1 against ND. SEC/Big Ten are grouped by losses and in general ACC(minus Miami/FSU/Clemson) and Big 12 have to have 1 fewer losses than those 2 conferences to be sprinkled in, SOS be damned. Big 12 is hurt by not having a "helmet school" and ACC has new helmet in Miami, FSU, Clemson. Big 12 is better overall than ACC though. IMO, the SOR was specifically created to give them significant cover so they can use the loss column. Your are telling me that the schools in the top 14 on SOR are the exact same 14 that are listed by the CFP but that SOR is not almost completely related/weighted to the loss column? TLDR: do everything in your power to minimize the number in the loss column
  5. you forget that if it was at Jordan Hare Vandy would have lost by 20+
  6. instead of a Heisman ceremony, the top 2 Heisman candidates should have to play a game against each others teams for the trophy.
  7. PDS - Playoff Derangement Syndrome
  8. CFP can announce that ND has won the Catholic School National Championship every year.
  9. we were gonna beat that spare Carson Beck last year until we knocked his spare ass out of the SEC CCG.
  10. this. I would be different if our resume other than the loss column sucked. you know like a SOS in the 60's or 1 top 15 win or more than one loss over a team we should beat, or losing the only 2 tough games on our schedule or....
  11. based on nothing. good news for the Big 12 is that no one cares about SOS. see Tech
  12. thats a lot of if's for teams that aren't traditional powers. Clemson sure. everyone else, meh. Lea is Vandy, Key is GT.
  13. I'm not gonna root for it but it would be funny if dirt burglar gets lined up with ND and shuts them down. We also drilled the team that beat ND at home.
  14. sure, aggy sucks kinda like the Big 12.
  15. I really wish CCG's weren't a thing but I know they aren't going away($).
×
×
  • Create New...