Somewhere on Texags, someone has to be making the argument that Indiana would have at least 3 losses if they played in the SECSECSEC. I haven’t ventured over to the cesspool to check, but I’m sure more than one of them legitimately believes that.
I just got up and am not scrolling through 23+ pages. Have we seen someone here (or I’m sure on SEC Rant) explaining how Indiana would have 3-4 losses in the SECX3 and not even be in the playoffs? I’m sure that narrative is out there.
I don't care for the ACC at all. But to claim Miami would have multiple losses in the SEC is ludicrous this year, when the only objective evidence we have is that the SEC fared abysmally against OOC competition, regular season and post. I'm absolutely not a UM fan, but any team can lose on any given Saturday. UT-UF, for example. I also think it's ridiculous that they lost to SMU and Louisville. But look at SEC OOC losses. Plenty of equal claims can be made about any SEC team this year except Georgia and, maybe, UT, although the UF loss was a bad loss.
Hahahahahaa. Two years. That’s how long it took to have UT fans sounding like Liucci. The results on the field in a competitive tournament don’t matter, just the hrrrr-drrrr week-in-week-out grind of SECX3. Any SECX3 team is magically better than anyone else, and the only reason those other teams can win is because: 1) Week-in-week out grind beat up the SECX3 teams. 2) SECX3 didn’t want to be there. If any full-strength SECX3 team were to play in any other conference, they’d sweep the conference and the playoffs. It’s science. Now explain why Indiana and Oregon would have 3-4 losses in the SECX3. I’m sure you can. Same logic. Or any of the other 8 P4 teams that beat SECX3 teams in this postseason.