Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1852
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. Your characterization of Giuffre’s remarks about Trump is not accurate. She stated that she didn’t ā€œTHINK Trump participated in anything.ā€ She elaborated that she ā€œnever saw or witnessed Trump participate in those acts, but was he in the house of Epstein? I’ve heard he has been but I haven’t seen him myself so I don’t know.ā€ That is MILES different than saying he didn’t do anything. She never even saw him at the house. Of course she was not always there, so her statement is not as conclusory as your summary of her comments makes them out to be. ETA: This is important because it’s entirely reasonable to believe that she was telling the truth AND Trump did sex from stuff involving Epstein’s operation.
  2. Bumped this post to say that I held off on adding more WWR. Happy about it, since it just dipped below $1.00
  3. I’m way behind on this thread, but it’s weird that you refer to a trafficking/sexual abuse victim as a ā€œwhore/hookerā€.
  4. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ondas-holdings-reports-record-third-130000481.html
  5. ONDAS cranking up 25% today to about $7.00 share. Anyone know why?
  6. I would presume that the ā€œaccountsā€ for people will be accessed on a government website. I would also assume that the various options from insurers will be advertised or whatever on there. That actually might be a decent idea. I would kinda think of that whole interface/website as… an exchange, if you will. ETA: The money in the account could appropriately be referred to as a health care credit. I’m on board now.
  7. What are you thinking as far as a target for pulling the trigger on a bounce if it occurs?
  8. The other issue is that if the ACA subsidies are taken up and even passed as a ā€œcleanā€ standalone measure, DOTARD can just veto it or threaten to veto it, which Johnson/Thune will use as cover.
  9. They won’t rule until next year though, right?
  10. Sir, this is the stonks thread. My answer to ā€œwhyā€ is… we bought a stonk. Now I can have even more of the stonk for cheap.
  11. Anyone else considering DCA’s some more WWR? It’s around $1.28 this morning. My initial stuff cost me $1.72.
  12. It seemed to me like we called plays more aligned with 2h of Miss St game from the opening kickoff today. Much easier for Arch to make reads and decisions.
  13. Counterpoint: His putting stroke is just fucking awful.
  14. Isn’t it possible, given the language of the SENTENCE (stop calling it a story or article) that an NFL person reached out to Sexton to just see if there was any possibility of being open to further communications about a possible job opening? Sexton said ā€œof course we aren’t saying 100% no at this timeā€œ. That scenario could be true and still account for the language used by the reporter. I only point this out because I keep seeing references to this whole shit just taking it as fact that SARK ā€œput feelers outā€, etc.
  15. Agree with your take on REE stuff. Another facet of this to me is that it’s also likely that China is working us over currently, promising/agreeing to some things which will be vague in nature, simply to postpone the 100% tariff threat. And then they will just revert back to REE fuckery, which is great for these investments. * MVST still making some nice gains and I’m holding my UUUU, which has been holding pretty steady through this recent general REE decline.
  16. When he says that he’s pissed about something being reported as if it’s factual, to me, it pretty obviously implies an assertion that it’s not factual. I know my take isn’t exciting at all but I guess I’m just a basic bitch sometimes.
  17. Yep. He used to enable rape by his team. Now he enables rape OF his team.
  18. I’m not optimistic. This isn’t new. He’s had a QB for 2.5 seasons now that clearly demonstrates greater effectiveness with the spread concept stuff.
  19. The actual ā€œclaimā€ in the ā€œstoryā€ is that the reporter was told something. That can totally be true…WITHOUT that ā€œsomethingā€ being true.
  20. ā€œArticleā€ doing a lot of work in your posts. I’ve only seen the single-sentence tweet. Has Russini elaborated in other x posts or is there a fleshed out article published by The Atlantic on this?
  21. I need to see a better angle of that play. I couldn’t tell if it was double coverage or just Wingo’a guy leaving his assignment to break on that ball after it was thrown. I want to see where that second defender was and what they were doing right before the ball was thrown.
  22. Apparently you’re not familiar with his work.
  23. Man that really looks like a coach who has checked out with one foot already out the door. /rolleyes
  24. I think he’s been alright today. There have been several times that I wish he would just bring the ball down and take off. Pressure gets there, but somehow leaves a small escape window and he’s trying to keep his eyes downfield to make a throw. With only 1.3 seconds to work with, he needs to hit eject faster, if possible.
  25. So this whole rumor makes no sense. Allegedly, Sark’s wife had wed with one or more WR’s but came back to him? The alleged players are black. Sark is not. Ergo, there is no way she ā€œwent backā€. Case closed.
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...