To be more fair, IIRC, one of Perry’s most influential money bundler/PAC people was on the board of the the pharma company that produced the vaccine to be mandated. It wasn’t some legitimate rational decision based on wanting to do what was best for Texans.
We have similar victims rights laws in Texas. The key operative language is “consult with”. And so tbh our reading the Idaho statute, I would presume that victim’s families do also have an absolute right to make impact statements after entered has been pronounced.
Ok, but I read the article you linked and…help me out here…but where is the discussion of being close to a deal and what sources are they citing that are not from Trump world?
I was able to get some shares in the IPO at $31/each. No clue how it will do long term, but I just wanted to try out some IPO action and happened to get some of RH’s allocation.
I’m curious to know how the data, wrt to outcomes, efficacy, recommendations, etc. of annual COVID “boosters” compares to our approach to the annual flu vaccine.
Also, per Reuters, HD Is Exec. VP said: "There's items that we have that could potentially be impacted from a tariff that, candidly, we won't have going forward if it doesn't make sense inside the line structure,".
Yes. They explained this in the movie. There was a female Asian assistant to the NYT guy, whom he sent there to eat and write a review. She was there the last night of operation. There’s no plot conflict. They were not doing jack shit for business, like you said. Had one last night to operate. The reviewer was there because she was sent there. ETA: I *think* this might have been revealed in one of the panels during the credits.
I stumbled upon Proven a few years ago and never looked back. I refer everyone possible to them. Just had them out to my new place yesterday to bid some work.