From what I can tell, STAFFERS requested the McCain measures, but the Navy denies acting on them (blocking sewage barge always there, no sailors denied admission). Is that current? I get the whole point that Pres. Snowflake has to be handled. I would just feel better knowing that our Navy isn't wasting resources on the effort.
What about all the crappy little strip center for-profit "ERs"? I know TX law requires an ambulance bay. Surely they aren't required to take indigents, are they?
I get the sentiment of the OP, but that is a pretty rough law from the standpoint of a US citizen. We would call that a revenue raiser that infringes on Constitutional rights. Also stops another lane of traffic. Def SHOULDN"T photograph crashes, but you should be allowed to if you mistakenly choose to.
FRIEND got 2 recent tickets in quick succession. Neither of us have EVER gotten any tickets before, so I thought I would ask a bunch of smart lawyers.
Richardson red light (torrential rain and it was barely even yellow) and Garrett (I-45) 10% over (freak tailwind going downhill).
Prefers defensive driving over deferred adjudication.
Friend understands that DPS copy of driving record showing no defensive driving within past year is required and he will get one (or 2) copies after contacting courts. Since both copies will be timely and will show no DD is it possible to use DD (2 if necessary) to deal with both tickets? Is this a loophole because the tickets were so close together?
I imagine he has to certify no DD for a ticket w/in 12 months when applying for DD and he could honestly do that now for each court appearance, but yall see any flaws in this potential plan? Thx (for friend).