Jump to content

TtomTerrific

banned
  • Posts

    1056
  • Joined

Everything posted by TtomTerrific

  1. So you assholes aren’t even covering the riots in Philly? How do you not see this for the election interference it is supposed to be? It’s not going to work, but the fact that you endorse this is asinine and reflective of your further overall culpability in the massive popularity surrounding the guy you hate so much. Y’all are doing it again. Specially you,Hobbes. Man-bun won’t survive this well.
  2. The only one blocked from testifying was Horowitz by Jerry Nader. The Senate does not call witnesses just like no jury anywhere call witnesses. Y’all had an entire Mueller thing. Zero Pelosi delaying sending her “case” to the trail. - Zero Donald Trump JR interrogated 30 hours - zero but some dinner he went to But you now see NONE of this Biden shit worth even a minute of NPR (tax payer funded. All of us) worth mentioning and are completely cool with the blackout that Twitter and Facebook (and now YouTube) have put on the New York post. Election interference at BEST. Straight up authoritarian violation of everything sacred in our Constitution at worst. But fuck that a long time ago. But, “ban TTom”. More censorship can’t be wrong. You do it everywhere else! There’s a reason so many have had to go to Chinese reporting on this matter. Think about that. “Speech” has fewer restrictions placed on it in Communist Fucking China than how you would have it here.
  3. Original. Stop shredding our Constitution and the populist response won’t be an Orange Hate guy to throw your hate back at you. This wouldn’t be spontaneously happening in places like Wait for it. Beverly Hills! Completely without any campaign awareness that it would happen. The response is organic, visceral and from a deep place of sincerely wanting the lefts divisiveness strategy met in kind. This is why he’s even possible.
  4. Of course I understand that nobody here “gives a shit”. And normally it wouldn’t be post worthy information other than to further illustrate how you and the majority of the others here took a complete fabrication, with ZERO evidence nor witnesses all of the way to the level of impeaching a duly elected President who you really, really, really wish hadn’t been elected. Nancy Pelosi has stopped all legislative work on things like, oh , I don’t know. Helping those who were affected by either the Coronavirus directtiy or the economic stoppage or schools being shut. Nope. Hugo and his skreed here had you all-in with your PomPoms - All-in on NOTHING. If there would have been ANYTHING tangible. Like a witness or am electronic devise containing communications with the proof y’all were literally DYING for, the Impeachment according to your rules now , should not have even been permitted discussion on Twitter. You see? Much like Trump being elected BECAUSE of you, so does this Biden scandal “mattter”. DIRECTLY because of what YOU just put this country through. Fucking perfect that it happens to be THE SAME country involved (two of them. anyway) that Schiff and the Hugo Stiglitzes chose to use to dream shit up about. So. In terms you can understand, if you want to “be taken seriously about the obvious need for a change in the White House”. Stop either flat out lying with hypocritical feigned outrage to the point of damaging the country, or at least apply your bullshit equally to the violator of the law, no matter how politically convenient for you. Or, when Trump wins this again, don’t be confused when YOU are blamed, again.
  5. Where did all the money go? 10 million was to go to JP Morgan to Onida Holdings as a non-recourse loan from CFC to Biden Family. Documented from Cairman Xi abs is number 3 guy. Some finance guy “Xang”. Non recourse loan “to capitalize BD family” (Xi’s memo. Not to Sino-Hawk , not to Onida holdings. To BD family. Bobulinski understands BD to mean Biden. 10 million in two tranches to JP Morgan of 5mill each. Waiting for it to show up “Roznaft” State owned Russian energy company is selling 14% to his guy Xang. Money still on hold. Xang can’t get into US anymore. Leaving shoe boxes of cash for African leaders. 8 billion for 14% of Roznaft. Figures that his deposits to JP Morgan are on hold due to this. Then it dawns on him Hunter Calls Hunter who is in Xi’s penthouse in NYC cuz only face to face. Hunter is there working as the “personal attorney” for Chairman Xi. And this brokering of the 9 billion to purchase Roznaft. Don’t worry so much about the JP Morgan thing Seal team is now 24 hours watching over his family due to the death threats they’ve been getting from those who don’t want this coming out. Much more is coming. Hardly scratched the surface of what he’s provided as evidence
  6. Joe Biden was referred to Joe as “my Chairman” in electronic messages to distinguish him from Xi. Joe interrupts one of the message chains, “veto-ing” Sino-Hawk’s proposed “change in governance”
  7. Khazikstahn now involved because it kept their attention from where he needed guidance as to their wishes.
  8. After drinks , Joe walked him to his car after hiding behind a pillar in the bar. Face to face meeting . On way to car, told him to take car of his brother and his son....he was in. Particularly upset at the Russian disinformation Schiff on record. He’s a decorated naval officer, veteran and still holds “Q” top secret clearance....Gave Schiff until midnight to retract the accusation that he’s an instrument of Russia disinformation. Waited for Biden to go on record and retract. He doesn’t care about the political consequence. This is all about following through with giving Schiff an ultimatum and Joe Biden not even lifting the phone to have Schiff retract. This is Bobulinski extracting his name and his family’s name from Russian made up bullshit. They could have avoided all this but allowing this by getting his name out of the Russia lies of Adam Schiff. The evidence he turned over is overwhelming and complete and nothing he has said hasn’t been thoroughly corroborated in the email and text messages Luxembourg and Milan are involved with Ukraine and China
  9. Entire enterprise concocted as Bibulinski was recruited first by Jim Biden, then closed the deal on bringing him on as CEO at meeting with Joe Biden at bar at Beverly Hills Hilton They were going to be fielding offers from Chairman XI. All invitations, summaries and follow ups to this meeting we’ll chronicled in emails he turned over. Joe didn’t think Gilliar or Hunter could roll tough enough to get serious like this. Hunter tried to take credit for all this. Hunter was understood as an idiot. “Plausible deniability”was Jim Biden’s specific, proud two word answer to “how are you guys getting away with all this?” - repeatedly. Other Biden family members would repeat that as an inside joke...including Joe. Onida Holdings didn’t include an equity split for Joe by name. Jim’s equity split increased from 10% to 20% for extra 10% to Joe.
  10. Bobulinski goes on for a full hour with Tucker Carlson specifically about Joe Biden and his involvement in Sino-Hawk.
  11. Transformational figure in contemporary American comedy and the reason anyone ever heard of Richard Pryor.
  12. ✔Breitbart....dude was way ahead of his time. I was going to just put the YouTube of this Chinese televsion guy daily devestating the narrative so delicately constructed here about Joe Biden's corruption - instead of the copy and paste - bu surprisingly Hunter Biden is now being Watergated from all YouTube searches. I'm sure you're cool with that, but since your pal here was cutting and pasting from the Guardian, I didn't think you would mind this. Actually, I did know you would mind this. That was kind of the point. Sort of "perfomance art"..you know, showing you your hyporicy while responding to your hypocricy. I'll mark you down as "not a fan".
  13. say what you want about the Trumpkins....dude that's killing Bidens is that cat on Chinese television is systematitcally destroying all of the good work our big Tech social media, and mainstream media, are doing in the way of eleciton interference. He's been at it for about 3 weeks and he's been dead on on the exact release of each component part. Here's some stuff about Ukraine - After big tech companies suppressed a New York Post article exposing written evidence that Joe Biden “spent some time together” with a top executive of a corrupt Ukrainian energy firm that was enriching his son, media titans are misleading the public about the central facts of this explosive affair. Twitter, for a prime example, pinned a post to the top of its home page claiming that Biden “played no role in pressuring Ukraine officials into firing the prosecutor” at the core of this case. That is flatly disproven by the words of Biden himself, who stated on video that he told Ukraine’s president and its prime minister that he would withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid from their nation unless they removed the prosecutor. “If the prosecutor is not fired,” warned Biden, “you’re not getting the money.” Biden then added, “Well, son of a bitch, he got fired.” (WHAT WAS THAT "EVERY ACCUSATION IS AN ADMISSION THING AGAIN?) Twitter’s brazen falsehood only scratches the surface of media misinformation about this matter. In addition to spreading outright fictions, media outlets are failing to present key verified facts that are necessary to see the big picture. These facts—which are documented in the following bullet points—build upon each other and implicate Joe Biden in a web of corruption that involves bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice: In April 2014, while Joe Biden was vice president, he traveled to Ukraine and promised its parliament that the U.S. would help the nation increase its fossil fuel production to make it less dependent on Russian energy. In that same month: the largest private natural gas producer in Ukraine appointed Biden’s son Hunter and his business partner to the company’s board and began making payments to their firm that amounted to more than $3.3 million. the owner of the energy company—a Ukrainian oligarch named Nikolai Zlochevskyi who the U.S. State Department considered corrupt and who had just fled to Russia—personally approved Hunter’s hiring. the oligarch’s London bank accounts were seized by British officials in a money laundering investigation. (hmm..there's that pesky money laundering investigaiton again) In February 2015, the U.S. State Department and the FBI learned that Hunter’s oligarch benefactor allegedly bribed Ukrainian prosecutors to shut down investigations of him. Thus, the government of Ukraine replaced the chief prosecutor with a new one that would be fired one year later at the insistence of Joe Biden. Both Bidens claimed that they never discussed Hunter’s business dealings with each other, but a corroborated trove of emails shows that a top executive of the energy company thanked Hunter in April 2015 for “inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent some time together.” In November 2015, the same top executive wrote an email to Hunter and his partner in which he: criticized a proposal they recently sent to him because it was “lacking concrete tangible results that we set out to achieve in the first place” and did not “offer any names of top US officials” or “Ukrainian officials” to help the oligarch improve “his situation in Ukraine.” stated that if they left these names out of their proposal “to be on the safe and cautious side, I can understand the rationale.” instructed them to “proceed immediately” with enlisting “high-ranking US officials” to visit Ukraine and persuade “the highest level of decision makers here in Ukraine” to “close down” all “cases/pursuits against” the oligarch. The next month in December 2015, Joe Biden acted in accord with the instructions of the energy company executive by visiting Ukraine and telling its president and its prime minister: “If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.” On February 2, 2016, the chief prosecutor secured a court order to seize property of the oligarch, including his land, houses, and a Rolls-Royce Phantom. Two weeks later on February 16, the president of Ukraine forced the chief prosecutor to resign. White House phone logs show that Joe Biden talked to the president of Ukraine at least three times in the week surrounding the firing. The phone log for the last of these calls states: “The Vice President also commended President Poroshenko’s decision to replace Prosecutor General Shokin, which paves the way for needed reform of the prosecutorial service.” Contrary to Biden’s claim that the prosecutor stood in the way of reform, when the president of Ukraine announced the firing, he complimented the prosecutor for implementing reforms that his predecessors had “been opposing for decades” and then listed the specific reforms. The president then said that he only asked the prosecutor to resign because he “failed to gain society’s trust.” Two months later in May 2016, Ukraine’s parliament approved the president’s appointee for a new chief prosecutor who was: the best man of the president who appointed him. sentenced to prison in 2012 for embezzlement and abuse of office. convicted in a separate 2012 case for illegal surveillance. pardoned by the previous president and released from jail in 2013. Six months later on November 1, 2016, this new chief prosecutor, who Biden later described as “solid,” dropped all criminal charges against the oligarch. The prosecutor then applauded these actions as a “success” because the oligarch paid $7.46 million in back taxes and penalties as part of the settlement. Far from being a prosecutorial victory, the oligarch praised these outcomes and stated that they would allow his corporation to increase production and “attract international companies to Ukraine.” Two weeks later on November 16, the energy company made its last documented payment to Hunter. In addition to the recent closure of all criminal cases against the oligarch, Donald Trump had just won an upset victory in the U.S. presidential election. This left Joe Biden incapable of using U.S. taxpayer funds to influence Ukrainian officials. In March 2019, the Ukrainian president who followed Biden’s order to remove the chief prosecutor lost his bid for reelection. The next month in April 2019, Hunter resigned from the board of the energy company. Five months later in August 2019, the prosecutor who Biden praised as “solid” resigned under pressure from the new president after failing to prosecute anyone of note during his three–year tenure. In June 2020, the oligarch tried to bribe other prosecutors who began to investigate him, and police seized the bribe money. The payoff was six million U.S. dollars, the largest bribery seizure in the history of Ukraine. In the face of all of these incriminating facts, NPR’s Public Editor posted a Tweet saying that NPR is not reporting on “the NY Post’s Hunter Biden story” because “we don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.” The Prosecutor Was Actively Investigating the Oligarch and Hunter One of the more outlandish falsehoods about this affair comes from the Washington Post’s lead “Fact Checker,” Glenn Kessler. He claims that the chief prosecutor (Viktor Shokin) who was sacked at the behest of Biden “was not investigating” the oligarch’s company (Burisma) at the time.” As proof of this, he asserts: In September 2015, then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt publicly criticized Shokin’s office for thwarting a British money-laundering probe into Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. In reality, however, the U.S. ambassador was not criticizing Shokin but his predecessor, Vitaliy Yarema. This is proven by the fact that the British money laundering probe cited by the ambassador ended on January 21, 2015, and Shokin was not appointed chief prosecutor until the next month in February 2015. The London Guardian, the Financial Times, and the New York Times all reported that the probe ended in January, raising the question of how Kessler could honestly botch this fact. Testimony to Continue Today in Meng Wanzhou’s Extradition Hearing In a related article, Kessler scales up the rhetoric and claims that the ambassador “blasted Shokin for ‘openly and aggressively undermining reform’ and having ‘undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases’.” However, the ambassador stated that “corrupt actors within the Prosecutor General’s office” did this, not Shokin. Furthermore, in the very same speech that Kessler misquoted twice, the ambassador began speaking about the present and said: “We want to work with Prosecutor General Shokin” and help him lead “the fight against corruption.” This further demonstrates that Shokin is not the person who the ambassador castigated. Twitter, in turn, invoked Kessler’s bogus fact check to insist that the “prosecutor was not investigating Burisma at that time.” Like Kessler, articles by CNN and Bloomberg take the ambassador’s words out of context to make it seem like he was lambasting Shokin instead of his predecessor. In contrast to those false reports—court records, first-hand sworn testimony, and the words of a top executive of the oligarch’s energy company show that Shokin was, in fact, investigating the oligarch and also Hunter at the time Joe Biden forced the firing of the prosecutor. Just two weeks before he was fired, the Prosecutor General’s Office, which was led by Shokin, obtained a court order to seize property of the oligarch, including his land, houses, and a Rolls-Royce Phantom. In 2019, Shokin signed a sworn affidavit stating: “The truth is that I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm active in Ukraine and Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, was a member of the Board of Directors.” The president of Ukraine “was emphatic that I should cease my investigations regarding Burisma. When I did not, he said that the US (via Biden) were refusing to release the USD $1 billion promised to Ukraine. He said that he had no choice, therefore, but to ask me to resign.” Shokin also wrote to reporter John Solomon that his “specific plans” for the investigation “included interrogations and other crime-investigation procedures into all members of the executive board, including Hunter Biden.” Three months before Shokin was fired, a top executive of the oligarch’s energy company sent an email to Hunter and his partner urging them to get “high-ranking US officials” to persuade “the highest level of decision makers here in Ukraine” to “close down” all “cases/pursuits against” the oligarch. In this email, he identified the “Prosecutor General” as one of his “key targets.” Authenticity of the Laptop’s Content A common media refrain is that the content published by the NY Post from Hunter’s laptop is not authenticated or verified. Leslie Stahl of CBS’s 60 Minutes went as far as to say that it “can’t be verified.” Such claims are belied by the fact that key aspects of it have already been verified. For example, the listed recipient of one of the most damming emails released thus far has confirmed that he received the email. Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter’s, issued a public statement that he is “the recipient of the email” and that the “email is genuine.” The email lays out how the “equity” of a business venture with “CEFC” (a Chinese energy company) will be “distributed.” It does this by using the initials of the people copied on the email and numbers that add up to 100 percent. The last one of these says “10 held by H for the big guy?” According to Bobulinski, “the big guy” is “in fact a reference to Joe Biden,” as “Hunter Biden called his dad ‘the Big Guy’ or ‘my Chairman’.” Beyond such first-hand testimony, the NY Post points out that it has published an array of pictures and emails from the laptop that “contain an extraordinary level of detail,” “most of which have nothing to do with Ukraine or China.” These include, for example, a picture of Hunter in a bathtub and a picture of a Biden family meal, along with emails to friends and family all bearing dates and times. On their own and collectively, these confirmable details corroborate that these are Hunter’s communications. Moreover, if any of these communications were fictitious, it would be easy to prove this by showing that other people copied on the emails and texts received something different. Yet, no one has even claimed this is the case, much less presented proof of it. While ignoring all of the evidence that supports the authenticity of the laptop’s contents, Joe Biden, Adam Schiff (Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee), and a group of government intelligence officials led by James Clapper (Obama’s Director of National Intelligence) are claiming that the contents of the laptop could be or definitely are Russian “information.” Yet, as Clapper and company admit, “we do not have evidence of Russian involvement—just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case.” That same group of people who are now invoking Russia previously spread demonstrable falsehoods that Trump and his team colluded with Russia in the 2016 election. These rampant accusations were disproven by a 2-year, $32 million investigation by an independent counsel which “did not establish” or “identify evidence” that members of the “Trump Campaign” or “any U.S. persons” “conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” Furthermore, the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice (an Obama appointee) “identified at least 17 significant errors or omissions” in warrant applications that the Obama administration used to surveil people associated with the Trump campaign for their Russia collusion investigation. The Inspector General also reported that he “did not receive satisfactory explanations” for these misleading warrant applications. Nevertheless, a range of broadcasts and publications by NBC, the Daily Beast, the New York Times, Business Insider, and Vox have given more airtime and credence to politically opportune speculation from partisans who previously spread misinformation about Russian collusion than to the verifiable facts of this matter. Biden’s “Official Schedules” Another common media canard is the uncritical parroting of this statement from the Biden campaign: “We have reviewed Joe Biden’s official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place.” That talking point is effectively meaningless because Biden’s official schedules are not comprehensive, and after Politico pressed the campaign about this matter, it reported: Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi (the energy company exec), which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule. But they said any encounter would have been cursory. Even that admission is deceptive because Biden’s official schedules are so incomplete that they are even missing White House meetings. A prime example is an Oval Office meeting on January 5, 2017 in which Biden, Obama, and other administration officials discussed prosecuting Trump’s incoming National Security Advisor (H/T Joel Pollak). The Meeting Occurred Yet another media falsehood is the claim that the email isn’t clear about whether Joe Biden actually met with the energy executive. The Associated Press, for instance, reported that “the wording” of the email “makes it unclear if he actually met Joe Biden.” That is refuted by carefully reading the email, which states: Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent some time together. It’s realty an honor and pleasure. As we spoke yesterday evening, would be great to meet today for a quick coffee. What do you think? I could come to you office somewhere around noon or so, before or on my way to the airport. Given room for the language barrier, even if the executive meant “spend some time together” when he wrote “spent some time together,” he still used the word “pleasure,” which is not the kind of thing one would say if he merely had an unfulfilled opportunity to meet the VP. Also, the fact that the executive was flying out on the same day begs the question of why he would be thanking Hunter for inviting him from Ukraine to DC for a meeting with the VP that never occurred. Summary The documented facts of Joe Biden’s dealings in Ukraine show that the following events unquestionably took place: In the very same month that Biden promised Ukrainian legislators that the U.S. would help Ukraine increase its fossil fuel production, his son Hunter began a lucrative deal with a Ukrainian natural gas company owned by a notoriously corrupt oligarch who had just fled to Russia. Both Bidens claimed that they never discussed Hunter’s business dealings with each other, but a corroborated trove of emails shows that Hunter brokered a meeting between his father and one of the gas company’s top executives. A month after the same top executive ordered Hunter to get “high-ranking US officials” to visit Ukraine and persuade “the highest level of decision makers” to “close down” all cases against the oligarch, Joe Biden visited Ukraine and told its president and its prime minster that they must fire the nation’s chief prosecutor or he would withhold U.S. aid to Ukraine. (lol again at impeachment hearings) Two weeks after the chief prosecutor secured a court order to seize property of the oligarch, the president of Ukraine fired the prosecutor amidst multiple phone calls with Joe Biden. The Ukrainian president then appointed a new chief prosecutor who was recently let out of jail and who quickly dropped all criminal cases against Hunter’s oligarch benefactor. Joe Biden later called this prosecutor “solid.” Two weeks after the criminal cases against the oligarch were dropped, the energy company made its last known payment to Hunter. After Biden’s “solid” prosecutor failed to prosecute anyone of note during his three-year tenure, he was replaced with a new prosecutor who began to investigate the oligarch. The oligarch then attempted to bribe people in the prosecutor’s office with $6 million. While failing to report those key facts that illuminate this affair, major media outlets are spreading conspiracy theories, half-truths, and brazen falsehoods that hide what occurred. This includes but is not limited to claims that: the chief prosecutor who was sacked at the insistence of Biden was not investigating the oligarch or his company at the time. the contents of the laptop are not verified. Biden’s official schedules don’t show the meeting. the email isn’t clear about whether Joe Biden actually met with the energy executive. the Russian government is behind all of this. No evidence has yet emerged that Joe Biden voiced illicit intentions about his dealings in Ukraine, but the verified facts about his actions align with textbook definitions of nepotism, bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice. Moreover, grossly misleading coverage of this matter by Twitter, the Washington Post, NPR, Bloomberg, CNN, CBS, the New York Times, and the Associated Press is consistent with recent academic research that finds large corporate media outlets “play a significant and important role in the dissemination of fake news.” In turn, scientific surveys show that a large portion of the public harbors critical misconceptions that have been spread by these outlets. Appendix of Names Biden family and associates: Joe Biden, Vice President of the United States from January 2009–January 2017 Hunter Biden (formally Robert Hunter Biden), Joe Biden’s son Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s business partner and a former top fundraiser for John Kerry, the U.S. Secretary of State while these events unfolded Rosemont Seneca Bohai, a Delaware corporation that combines the names of “Rosemont Seneca Partners” (a company owned by Hunter and Archer) and “Bohai Harvest RST” (a Chinese investment firm partly owned by Hunter and mainly owned by the government of China) Ukrainian energy company: Burisma, the largest private natural gas producer in Ukraine, which paid at least $3.3 million to Rosemont Seneca Bohai Nikolai Zlochevskyi (a.k.a Nikolay or Mykola Zlochevsky), primary owner of Burisma and notoriously corrupt oligarch who approved placing Hunter on the board of Burisma Vadym Pozharskyi, a top executive at Burisma who met with Joe Biden and ordered Hunter to get “high-ranking US officials” to “close down” all cases against Zlochevskyi Ukrainian government: Petro Poroshenko, the Ukrainian president who fired the nation’s chief prosecutor after Joe Biden threatened to withhold U.S. aid unless the prosecutor was removed. Viktor Shokin, Ukraine’s chief prosecutor who was investigating and seizing the assets of Zlochevskyi until he was fired at the behest of Joe Biden Yuriy Lutsenko, Shokin’s successor who Joe Biden described as “solid“ after he dropped all criminal charges against Zlochevskyi Vitaliy Yarema, Shokin’s predecessor who was fired after people in his office thwarted investigations of Zlochevskyi and allegedly received a bribe from him
  14. Why Johnny Ringo - that sounds like a threat..... Don't worry...those threats are baked in. Y'all are squarely under control, now Trump relied upon some foundational investigative bodies not having been rotted all of the way to the top, but that will be exorcised judiciously (snicker) immediately upon victory. Bill Barr is the adult in the room...he hasn't swallowed his whistle....he's waiting for the hell is he bringing not to be catlogued in history as politically motivated ahead of an General Election....Y'all think that the R's are going to be miserable post election.....Trump is ahead in Rasmmussen and other polls now, Ohio is now done, folks are wanting to know if they can change their mail in ballots, PA is next (nice timing with the riots last night to cement that deal). Ununhinged Bill Barr, a fired Christopher Wray and a Trump who doesn't need to run for office any longer.....careful about the fights you are picking....MANY have been spoiling for just that fight. FOR A WHILE here...just for giggles....
  15. Hey Pete- Here’s what an insurance policy Looks like
  16. what has Trump actually accomplished anyway?
  17. While the Democrats are howing at the sky somewhere, bedecked in their Halloween Handsmaid's Tale outfits, the real Party of Diversity is watching a woman Supreme Court Justice being sworn in by a black Supreme Court Justice.
  18. Of course Hayden wants to ban. How very Twitter of you. And no. Syd. There was no eight ball nor hooker. Girls in their twenties and total fall off the wagon are accurate. So was the Lakeway part . Thanks for sharing what was kind of a support group thread going on here in this way. Doesn’t bother me as I have been sober for almost 2 years. It may affect those who currently post in that thread and find some support there. To know that you can be counted on to share their information whenever you are dead wrong in a political discussion.
  19. I forgot about the attendant effeminate (sorry...”gender neutral”.) characteristic of the man-bun crowd here. No wonder you’re not outraged at Biden hiding like a broad. You all are just as frightened. Please, tell me again the “proper qualifier” that is acceptable here for the guy who had the temerity to type out the word “testimony” without the proper clearance. I mean if you have time in-between the Jimmie Jameses and Jazzes running around here labeling everything they can “racist” When Trump wins .....again And I tell you that it’s your responsibility more so than anyone in a MAGA hat. ...Again Look back at your behavior here and the frightened bitch you’ve picked as your nominee. Ain’t nobody got time for that shit. You are out of touch with America. You hate America and Trump is the manifestation of that hate returned. I warned you that your division and victimization and marginalization of issues of racial conflict would lead to an area that was violent and one in which you would lose. Unfortunately you would lose only after the whichever group you chose that news cycle to leverage their legitimate grievance for your political gain. (The Me Too movement and anyone who was legit active in the ACLU for the purposes of protecting our civil rights are wondering if they still have a current phone number for the American left) I didn’t have the foresight that you would have the further stroke of stupidity if actively campaigning to defund the one group who would protect you were shit to ever finally pop off. Some times folks can’t be saved. You go back to rooting for more Coronavirus fatalities and I’ll go back to the popcorn. The gymnastics have been entertaining, but the passers by here are here to watch the main event. The build up is so far has nuanced, emotional and perfect.
  20. You left out the part where he’s visibly shaken when the 3,5 million dollar wire from the Moscow Mayor’s wife is brought up in the same interview. Kudos for the selective editing, but if you quit soaking up what the NYT is laying down for you, you might be surprised what’s out there for consumption in the way of non-agenda driven information. For instance, this guy who leaked the laptop videos and images and some of the emails had been interesting to check in on from time to time http:// [/url] Of course, you may need to hurry because You Tube is joining in on the censorship when searches are done for clips of Joe Biden promising to ban fracking.... Joining Facebook And Twitter http:// https://streamable.com/4yg8vn Lovely what y’all have done with the bill of rights and the election interference.
  21. lol...the Guardian, NYT and NBC opinion pieces cited as sources and all of the attendand "kudos" Are links o the Sean Hannity show good as "proof" here? I was wondering, other than the giant move left on this board since I last visited, why chacters like ol "ibid" here are acting so strangely about this. Yelling to "shut the fuck up about this?" His show pony who is now in hiding and there's no other honest explanation for these "lids" and e's possibly business partners with the Chinese Communist Party, was the sitting VP when the arrangements were made and is asking people to vote for him to be the President now, but neither we nor the media are supposed to even ask about this? There IS a laptop, there wasn't a dossier. There are witnesses here, not opque 'whistle blowers.' Love the nice touch of pointing at the tax returns as some sort of proof. Seems to me that one would leave off reporting to the IRS the receipt of bribes from the Chinese, the Ukranians and the Iranians. Then it occured to me....this "Dabobbs" dude is terrified. That is what abject fear reads like - coming through the key stokes as he rapidly bullet points more opinoin pieces to substantiate his hypocrisy. Quick question for anyone who is still interested in being honest with themselves here instead of writing shit that reads like you are a terrified bitch.....if there's nothing to these emails that have been released....who here or anywhere else wouldn't immediately be out in front of reports that there's evidence of you possesing child porography and in compirising positions with you underessed underaged niece? Have enjoyed the gymnastics on display here, trying to convince youselves that Biden has done nothing wrong here, you actually still believe any of that impeachment shit you put this country through AND are on any sort of moral high gound, disciminating who and what need be "taken seriously" Y'all some scared bitches and it shows.
×
×
  • Create New...