Jump to content

RoyalBevo21

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1324 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I see why Auburn is 5-7. Holy unawareness from their players. By far.
  2. Agreed. It's the only way to fix the OOC stuff. There would be no penalty for going 0-3 out of conference.
  3. Agreed, win your division and you're in. It's baffling college football thinks they're too good for this model. So odd.
  4. Yet we get hammered for Florida and they're gifted with #2 and a first round bye.
  5. It's very very needed. The whole reason this thing went sideways to begin with was a concentration of power. The Big 12 circa 2008 was a really good conference. Had they not fucked up originally and grabbed Arkansas instead of letting Ann Richards bully Baylor's way in. After the breakup in 2010/11 lead to a concentration of power in the SEC that hurt our ability to recruit at the same level. I personally would enjoy a 64 team league with 8/8 team divisions with Texas paired up in a group like this: Arkansas Missouri Nebraska Oklahoma Oklahoma St Texas Texas A&M Texas Tech Leaves you 5 out of division slots to schedule whomever else you want.
  6. Indiana absolutely did. The fact that they're #2 is blasphemy.
  7. The difference is Texas had this left on the schedule: #3 Texas A&M #4 Georgia #8 Oklahoma #14 Vanderbilt Tech had nothing like that. And it's very unlikely they ever will in the Big 12. It's not the 2008 Big 12 South anymore. 25% of your conference is G5 filler now.
  8. The irony in that is I think losing to Ohio St game right out if the blocks really put a dent in the confidence of this team.
  9. Indiana literally actually just did this.
  10. We're locked in to Ohio St and Michigan. Both of those games were leveraged by Fox as part of our deal to move to the SEC. After that, yes, call up Rice and schedule for the next 10 years.
  11. I agree, but even Charlie Strong 5-7 Texas teams put beatings on G5 cream puffs. It adds nothing to the game and makes it way too convoluted to properly assess competition. This is the equivalent of a 6A team scheduling 5A teams. It's not good for the sport. Cignetti knows this and nuked every P4 game they had scheduled for the next few years. It's manipulating the system.
  12. I don't think FCS games should count as data points towards the postseason at all. For example, Indiana should be viewed as a 10-0 team rather than 12-0. The FCS beatings over inflate stats, efficiencies, unit ranks, etc.
  13. It's the single biggest problem in college football. There's like this "poor little retard" class of teams where because they are historically bad and have never accomplished anything in their history. College football way over inflates what they accomplish to pump a Cinderella narrative. Indiana has essentially accomplished nothing other than beating one ranked team on the road by 10. And are being gifted #2 for it.
×
×
  • Create New...