Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Vic Mackey

Legacy Members
  • Joined

Everything posted by Vic Mackey

  1. Holy blatant interference and drag down Batman. Right in front of the ref too.
  2. Yep, in the college game, you have to make that play to save a big gain.
  3. Got to love those kinds of calls. Running right at them, short stuff turns into long gains. Quick, let's call some ill advised flea flicker on 1st down....
  4. Solid defense on that drive Ole Miss
  5. More from Essay Patna: "The Truth about 78-37-5 When college football debates its greatest rivalries, the conversation usually begins and ends with all-time records. For Texas A&M fans, seeing the headline number against the University of Texas can feel frustrating without context. But to understand the Texas A&M–Texas rivalry honestly, you have to acknowledge one critical truth: This rivalry did not start on a level playing field. The Myth of the “Equal Start” Many of college football’s most famous rivalries began between institutions that were fundamentally alike. Take Michigan and Ohio State. Their rivalry began in 1897. From the very beginning, both were large, co-educational, civilian state universities. They recruited from similar populations, offered similar campus life, and built their programs using nearly identical institutional models. They started the race at the same starting line. Texas A&M and Texas did not. Two Very Different Institutions For roughly the first 80 years of this rivalry, Texas A&M was not a typical college campus. It was a small, all-male military institution where membership in the Corps of Cadets was mandatory. Every student lived under military discipline, with daily formations, strict conduct codes, and limited personal freedom. Texas, meanwhile, operated as a large, co-educational civilian university in a growing metropolitan area, offering a traditional college experience and drawing from a far broader recruiting base. Imagine trying to build a modern football powerhouse today where every player is required to live in barracks, wake up before dawn for drill, and follow a strict military code, while your rival across the state offers a conventional “big city” college environment with a student body several times larger. That was Texas A&M’s reality until the mid-1960s. When “Going to War” Was Literal World War II magnified this imbalance to its extreme. Because Texas A&M was a mandatory military school, its campus served as a direct pipeline for officer training and active duty. When the nation called, Aggie upperclassmen didn’t simply leave for the draft. They were expected to serve. By 1943, the Aggie football roster had been so depleted that the team consisted largely of 17-year-olds, earning the nickname the “Kiddie Corps.” Civilian universities like Texas were impacted by the war as well, but in a fundamentally different way. Programs such as the Navy V-12 allowed elite athletes to remain on campus while receiving military training. In the 1943 Texas–A&M game, Texas fielded several players who had actually played for A&M the year before but were reassigned by the military. That era alone accounts for a significant portion of the lopsided all-time record. Same rivalry. Same war. Very different conditions. The Most Skewed Stretch From 1940 to 1983, Texas posted a dominant 36-7-1 record against A&M. This period is often cited as proof of superiority, but it reflects more than coaching decisions or talent cycles. It reflects two programs operating under completely different institutional constraints. Texas was expanding resources, recruiting reach, and national stature. A&M was still balancing athletics with a unique military mission that restricted roster depth, recruiting flexibility, and continuity. When the Playing Field Finally Leveled The rivalry did not truly normalize until Texas A&M fundamentally changed. Women were admitted in 1963. In 1965, membership in the Corps of Cadets became voluntary. Over time, A&M evolved into a large, co-educational university capable of competing for talent under the same basic conditions as Texas. Once that transformation took hold, the results changed. From 1975 until the series paused in 2011, the rivalry stood at 19-19. No dominance. No imbalance. Just two comparable programs trading wins. Context Over Comparison The all-time record between Texas and Texas A&M is real, but it is not self-explanatory. It is a historical artifact shaped by decades when one institution accepted constraints that no modern football program would willingly take on. For Aggies, those early losses are not a source of embarrassment. They are evidence of an institutional mission rooted in service and sacrifice. While other rivalries grew up as equals, this one was forged between two entirely different worlds. Understanding that context doesn’t erase the record. It explains it."
  6. They are going to get their ad space in no matter what. After these long, time consuming drives, almost always commercials after the FG/XP and then after the kickoff.
  7. Sign me up
  8. I'd imagine this isn't the greatest news for Quinn. A new coach will bring in his own staff and probably want to go a new direction for QB.
  9. McDanielSSSS is out!!
  10. And sadly, they have been in 2 AFC championships and a Super Bowl more recently than Dallas.
  11. Pretty much. And Stephen is much worse. He is a penny pincher and doesn't believe in free agency. He loves to bargain shop once all the good talent is taken. He likes quantity over quality.
  12. Harbaugh needed to go and so does Tomlin. No idea the last coach to be fired after the playoffs but Tomlin needs to be. Both are stale and both franchises need new blood. I'd say Pittsburgh much more than Baltimore. Since reaching the AFC championship game in the 2016 season, 9 years ago, Pitt has 0 playoff wins. Tomlin keeps getting praise of no losing seasons but how many of those they actually had a team who could make any noise in the playoffs? They also gave Cleveland their first playoff win since the 90s, which was led by Baker Mayfield. Baltimore missing a FG shouldn't negate the fact that they almost crumbled completely and lost the division. I guess we will see how they fare in the playoffs but I don't see them beating Houston.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.