Jump to content

BoomerSooner2578

banned
  • Posts

    97
  • Joined

Everything posted by BoomerSooner2578

  1. I don't know what that means. I'm saying "OU's athletic dept. made a mistake... learn from it."
  2. I agree with everything you said about Mike Stoops, but I don't get what you're saying here. OU's D has improved SO much under Grinch with Mike's recruits being the upper-classmen.
  3. I've lived in Boulder for 13+ years. I don't live in OK. Sorry, @Longhornlove I didn;t mean to quote you. Don't know how that happened.
  4. There's much to learn in others' experiences, and mistakes. I'm not trying to start a "OU vs. UT" thing. Just look at what happened when Riley kept Mike Stoops on. Let your DC assemble his own staff, and be autonomous.
  5. I'm saying, "get the DC first, keep your hands off the defense, and let the DC hire his own staff." Learn from OUr mistakes, there's plenty. Mainly, not firing Mike Stoops in 2017 on DAY ONE.
  6. How is this trolling? I'm speaking from experience. What about my post isn't true? We had to fire Mike Stoops!
  7. Don't agree with hiring defensive assistant coaches / position coaches without the DC's consent. Sark should know better than that... he's rushing things when it's not necessary. We paid through OUr asses when an offensive genius took over as HC. We learned... "Hey, you're an offense mastermind, please do not dabble in defense, and please hire who the best minds tell you to, and leave them in autonomy." Sark reminds me of OUr offensive mastermind, who should take advice, and keep his hands off the defense. You guys saw Mike Stoops! That's a lesson- in what one should never do. Riley should have fired Mike Stoops day one. Instead he gave him a "chance" (poor decision).
  8. ^However... it would be prudent to completely give full control of the D to someone like Muschamp... with no interference from Sark until "you're fired." Disagree? Look at Grinch and OU's start (losing to KSU at home, then ISU, yet finishing where we did after we got Ronnie Perkins back)
  9. I think he'll do that, and many naysayers will be pleasantly surpirised. HE knows how to get the most out of Robinson and Thompson. Moreso than Herman would have. Think about it.
  10. I've lived in Boulder for 13+ years, I don't live in OK. =
  11. *sigh* No one has done better than Sark at 'Bama than your next HC.
  12. Hey. Go fuck yourself. Done. tubesock. Took less than one minute. Back in the game. Now, I want an answer, Why are the same posts so diametrically opposed / different than the other? It's the same post!
  13. My post #295 is no different than this post. I don't understand the difference RE: reaction.
  14. You guys are bringing up shit from when he was out-of-control drinking. I know I said, "I'll leave", but this is simply too much to ignore. He HAS to be clean, and Mike Stoops is not going to be your DC, and likely not a position coach. Sark was talented when he WAS addicted to / abusing alcohol. I realize that this post will get me AT LEAST fifteen more "fuck you" reactions, but UT would not have hired him if he was not clean and sober. Stop thinking about / over-analyzing the alcoholic Sark, and be open to the guy that is clean now.
  15. I'll leave. I was hoping to post in the UNC / Cult Aggy thread tonight, and celebrate Ass To Mouth losing, but I get it.
  16. Goddamn, "fuck you" left and right, and no one has even bothered to answer the honest questions. I'd wager that Sark is clean, and I'm sorry that you didn't land Urban Meyer, but have hope. Broyles Award
  17. WTF is up with all the "fuck you" reactions? You guys are too hung up on "Sark's gonna fail." OUr HR hire was a little-known DC out of Florida. Have some hope.
  18. Yes, Mike Stoops is (maybe WAS) a severe alcoholic.
  19. those questions were not meant to be trolling. I don't think UT would have hired Sark if he weren't clean.
  20. K, my questions are... "It's not resonable to think Sark would hire Mike Stoops, as he has not been clean for long enough to be selected as a reasonable choice for DC at UT. Why would anyone think he would be?" "Don't you think licensed private investigators have vetted Sark's alcohol intake enough to satisfy the powers that be at UT?" I think UT would be OK with a recovering alcoholic, who won the Broyles, but not OK with Mike Stoops, who needs more time (and for all we know may still be drinking compusively.) One is more likely to beat their alcoholism if they have hope in life, and I'll bet he's been clean. I'd have hired Bill O'Brien, but this may not be the catastrophe many of you are making it out to be. (Qualifier: I don't want anything to happen at UT that upsets the balance of OU beating Texas at the rate Riley has been) So, take that for what it's worth. Food for thought.
  21. I call my dad, "Uncle Beauford"... and on his SSN card, "Beauford" is spelt rong.
  22. UNC beat 1-loss Miami (the loss was to Clemson) in Miami 62-26, and it wasn't EVER a game.
×
×
  • Create New...