Jump to content

immamac

Administrators
  • Posts

    20540
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

immamac last won the day on November 18

immamac had the most liked content!

Reputation

55445 Surly 1%

8 Followers

About immamac

  • Birthday March 15

Titles

  • Title
    Owner

Recent Profile Visitors

98947 profile views
  1. Ok, well 2 more TDs for tech here.
  2. Tech seems like they suck. I have only watched this and the Arizona state game. I saw the score for the last time they played BYU and didn't watch. I thought they were beating everyone with big talented dudes? It just looks like a bunch of big slow white guys.
  3. Proves the ACC is dogshit. And ND is basically an ACC Not if they get blown out. A close loss is a lock though.
  4. And they totally deserve to be in if they do. Would be hilarious if tech gets bounced for losing. Holy fuck that would be incredible.
  5. Tech may not even fucking win.
  6. Tech needs to win 49-0 and so does Georgia and then, maybe Texas can sneak in.
  7. Never should have been 12. Should have always been 8 with no auto bids.
  8. I've heard that everyone thinks he's actually closer to 300.
  9. Did they hit multiple people?
  10. I'm going to spend real cycles next week fixing it.
  11. Wisner is a fantastic tandem back when paired with a bruiser. I don't think he leaves. CJ Baxter may leave or get less playing time, which really sucks.
  12. I listened to a podcast with him on bussin with the boys. He seriously has a room temperature IQ.
  13. You guys have lost your fucking minds. This isn't hard. There are only 5 maybe 6 teams that have the potential to win a national championship every year. 8 gets you those and some cinderellas that get a chance. You then make things meaningful by having cross conference play as a tournament with bowl games or exhibitions that's a little akin go the NIT for basketball.
  14. There has been no subsidy for consumer pricing on silicon, it's not just that there is no evidence of this, but it's easy to refute because the prices for consumer products in memory per gb are demonstrably higher than what hyperscalers buy at scale with long term agreements. The main issue with this isn't supply/demand dynamics, it's an artificial demand bump and an intentional supply shortage. The primary thing that will happen from this which benefits only the hyperscalers and memory companies will be that there won't be memory available for consumer PCs. What has happened is people can run their own inference for cheaper than buying a cloud service and they are trying to remove the option for most people and have it be inaccessible. The rest of the consumer PC market be damned. The cost of a single board computer including all components - even the CPU and storage is $35 and now the memory alone will cost $35 dollars. This will either put the SBC manufacturer out of business with no margins or they will increase price and the value won't be there for the typical consumer of those items. This is way beyond normal commodity cycle things, this is intentional scarcity that impacts individual consumers and not large corporate entities by design.
×
×
  • Create New...