No. You would link to actual quotes or videos or clips that aren’t overlayed by a narrative. Or specific links to legislation on a .gov website.
This is closer to reality than it is hyperbole. That’s what some of you are missing.
I fucking despise Greg abbot and think that what’s happening at the border is absolutely fucking insane. He didn’t kill 3 migrants though. Is there some level of argument you can make that he’s got some level of attribution to the circumstances that led to their deaths? Sure. Is he a huge piece of shit making the situation worse instead of better (I think so, but some people debate this). But the way that the conversation goes is exactly this. Greg Abbott fucking murdered those mother fuckers. Drowned them by his own (metaphorical) hands, fuck you if you don’t believe me here’s all the proof. <insert links not showing Greg Abbott murdering anyone, but being a shithead>
it’s toxic to the definition of the word as it relates to online toxicity. It’s not some fad fucking word of the day it’s unhealthy for everyone all around and it’s not constructive in any way.
im not worried about the profitability of the site. The site makes plenty of money. NIL, community events and all the shit that isn’t the actual website are what caused it to show a fiscal loss because we are tied to calendar year and not August to August where we would show a negiligible profit as I usually balance the budget to as close to 0 as possible to avoid paying taxes on profit that I intend to distribute as NIL or reinvestment into the community in the form of activities etc.
Im worried that we don’t add any fresh perspectives, our users are legitimately dying off and not being replaced and the parts of the site that used to keep people around that were fresh is now a main contributing factor for them specifically not sticking around for anything but drive by football takes.