Jump to content

Tex-19

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    4410
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tex-19

  1. Who else do we think may portal out that hasn't already been reported? Maybe Wardell Mack? Any bigger pain to look out for?
  2. Didn't one of the 9.95ers mention him a week or two ago?
  3. At one point pretty late in the year I saw a stat that Moore had the most catches in the country without a drop. Idk where all this drop talk is coming from. Moore wasn't a gamechanger but he wasn't bad either
  4. Didn't watch but his stat line is pretty good if you take out the INTs. One looked unlucky, the other bad
  5. Well said. It's a risky move but I don't mind it anymore. PK has been great, no doubt, and I actually don't think the D has been a problem against good opponents (think about both tOSU games, OU, A&M, most of UGA, etc). That said, last year was the outlier in pass defense. It's been an issue more often than not under PK. The intangibles you hit on are big. The team seemed to lack the same intensity this year that they had the previous two. Muschamp should bring back some of that fire. The biggest thing I like about this, IF true, is that Sark claims it will allow him to focus more on the offense. I've been saying for a long time that if he wants to be the OC, he needs to take other shit off his plate. In his presser, he said twice that Muschamp will be "HC of the defense" allowing Sark to spend more time on the offense. We'll see if that actually happens, and I have some skepticism, but it could be huge for the offense. Imo his biggest problem as OC is that he is probably spending 30% of his time on offense vs. the 100% an actual OC would spend. With that in mind, OF COURSE he isn't going to be as good at it. It would be the case for anyone. When the defense is on the field, an OC is looking at stills of what the defense is doing, talking to the QB, and thinking about the next playcalls. With Sark, he's coaching the defense and not doing any of that stuff. That makes the OC job a whole lot harder. This won't get him to 100% time but the more the better.
  6. It would be bold af but they probable should replace him. Although with Wiggins as OC I'm not sure how much it matters
  7. Alaska in mid-January
  8. A&M is going to have a tough decision on their hands this offseason at QB
  9. How the fuck did that not get picked
  10. Already in Miami territory, what idiots
  11. Game far from over
  12. Should've gone down at the 1. Kicker isn't THAT bad and it would've iced it
  13. Miami really needs to keep this in the center of the field
  14. Probably true
  15. They'd have like 1:15 left
  16. Would anyone be surprised to see 3 run plays, a missed FG, and an A&M pull one out of their ass? Not I
  17. Haha this is going to come down to a Miami FG attempt
  18. It's almost like that play has worked every single time. How smart would they be to keep doing it
  19. Hm tough call on declining that penalty
  20. Wait according to the announcer A&M only has 1 national title. What about their stadium sign??
  21. Randy Bond gonna win this game with a FG. That one looked amazing lol
  22. The way this game is going, it probably would've worked
  23. Shocked that wasn't a flag. Miami so dumb
×
×
  • Create New...