-
Posts
15787 -
Joined
-
Days Won
148
closetojumping last won the day on September 23
closetojumping had the most liked content!
Reputation
80223 Surly 1%About closetojumping

Recent Profile Visitors
-
Formidable fornicator Stephon Diggs fashions four fetuses
closetojumping replied to Dennis Taylor's topic in Football
This is the "paying telephone" version of the story a few of us were told at the time. Finley had recently gotten like a 5th girl pregnant while at UT. The Texas staff had him sit down with Sally Brown for a Sex Ed session. Like, a normal one and not a milf video from pornhub or wherever. She asked him about knowledge about using condoms and he explained that the condoms all kept breaking on him. That's the contemporaneous version told while the guy was still playing ball on campus. I assume one of those kids turned out to be Kaydon Finley, 2026 class WR at Aledo heading to Notre Dame after his dad made an ass of himself during the recruitment and burned various bridges with UT brass along the way. -
The Athletic Scoops Sark interested in NFL Jobs
closetojumping replied to TexasMan's topic in Football
The Giants are rumored to be in talks with Belichick.- 2636 replies
-
- 11
-
-
The Athletic Scoops Sark interested in NFL Jobs
closetojumping replied to TexasMan's topic in Football
I don't think Sarkisian "hates" coaching at Texas. I don't think his desire to go to the pros has much to do with Texas either. I just think he thinks he can kill it at the NFL level. It's pretty obvious that that is where his head is and where it has been for awhile. Sucks for us. While I don't agree with the idiotic premise that "anyone can win at Texas with NIL now", I also don't buy the implication that there aren't suitable or better replacements for Steven & Five. There's a growing view that, whether anyone wants to replace Sarkisian or not, a short list better be figured out. So, to answer your question from my end, Freeman, Lanning, and Kiffin - their agent(s) would be the first guy(s) I'd be talking to, and I'd make sure the money was right. I'd want those guys in that order. I'm unwilling to consider other options until Sarkisian is actually gone and all 3 of those guys offer "thanks, but no thanks." -
You point to Tech and Miami unironically and that is fantastic. Those two teams can compete, talentwise, with the P2 precisely because of what this era has enabled from a parity perspective, and this "era" is only 2-3 seasons old. As stated before, past is no longer prologue. You seem to only be able to comprehend shit directly in front of your face or whatever is in the rearview mirror. The concentration of potential victors is sliding from 3-4 teams each season to 7-10 now and likely 12-15 a few years from now. We don't need you to move the goalposts again or cite more well-known and obvious shit to support whatever point you think you're making. No one is going to be convinced by your certitude during a miasmic period of chaos.
-
Cool. AreaCode PitBull thinks that parity isn't a factor in CFB going forward and that we may never see a seed worse than 9 win the title. All we can do is watch and point and laugh from here when it happens, or when it doesn't.
-
Lawson Luckie is in concussion protocol but it sounds like they expect him back anyway. Elyiss Williams is a true freshman that is coming on and will be the next big thing at TE for Georgia. Generally speaking, it doesn't matter which one you were referencing, they're both really good to go along with Delp. I have faith in Texas' LBs to cover their TEs and backs from an athleticism perspective, but not from a scheme perspective. Whatever criticisms of Mike Bobo people want to offer, and many are justified, the guy knows how to get his TEs and backs open. Georgia also has an annoying white guy 3rd down back, named Cash Jones, I think, and he's someone that Texas is likely to magically let open just when we need a stop. I feel like Georgia always has a guy like this.
-
It's funny how that looks now versus end of the year. Texas has played its 3 shitty non-cons already and has 2 big games in prime time plus a rivalry game remaining. -Tennessee's had some big games already, but they still have Kentucky and NMSU left plus Vandy. The Vandy game will be watched, but that game will have a lot of competition and the other two games will be viewership dogshit. -Bama's Eastern Illinois match-up, as brave and daunting as it is, will have SECN+ viewership to average in to the overall number. -UGA still has Charlotte (SECN). -Ohio State will get the Michigan game boost, but UCLA and Rutgers are more anchors to the OSU numbers in the steaming pile of shit that is the Big 10. The top brands in the league are all going to wind up around the same average, and ahead of the rest of the sport, including Ohio State.
-
1) You've been posting on this site long enough to know that you do not have to explain shit like this to other long time posters. Do you think I was on a desert island or in solitary confinement in Huntsville during last year's playoff selection period? No, you chose to be pedantic on a tangent rather than admit the silliness of your overall point. 2) Ohio State was the 8th seed in this era, barely got into the playoffs after the embarrassing Michigan loss, and won it all. No one gives a fuck about the nuance of how they got to that seed but you, because it makes your prior position look inherently false on its face. 3) The larger point was a rebuttal to your larger point - parity is here and referencing the past to make a point about "10-12 seeds, even probably 8-12 seeds, don't really have a chance to win the title" is specious. This isn't 2015 in which its Bama, Ohio State, Clemson and sometimes LSU or Georgia with a real shot to win the whole thing. You want it to be one way, but it is the other. Do you have any evidence whatsoever showing that Vanderbilt is a bigger draw than Texas this year in terms of viewership? If you do, show your work. Otherwise, you're doing your stupid fanboi shit and making broad sweeping generalizations that you wish to be fact because you're excited about somebody or some thing. None of us know who the committee would pick between 10-2 Vandy and 9-3 Texas. The eyeballs would drive that decision. If anyone is actually taking the position that 10-2 Vandy gets in over 10-2 Texas, they haven't been paying attention. In both instances, Vandy would likely be pushing someone else out, but it wouldn't be one of the biggest brands in the sport, who they lost to, who is sitting there with 3-4 top 10 wins.
-
Hell, beating Georgia would legitimize Texas to a bunch of Texas people who have written Texas off, me included. I still see 8-4. I don't even expect Saturday to be close. Texas winning this game would be fucking stunning, and I'd absolutely take it. Irrespective of Saturday, the playoffs, or anything else, Texas needs to beat Arkansas and ATM both, for rivalry reasons. The offseason is better when that happens, social life is better, life is better. You can p-hack your way into whatever analysis you want, but this is disingenuous at its core. First, removing OU from the outcomes is fucking dumb. Second, Michigan went 9-4 last year after winning a title and beating OSU. We did that to them in their house in blowout fashion and they walked out of that stadium with their proud heads hung low. You didn't say "great" or "elite", you said "good", and Michigan in 2024 was a "good" team. Texas owned Clemson most of the day and won by 2 touchdowns. That's a 10-4 ACC Champion in the waning days of its dynasty era. That was a good team and whining about their small and ineffective comeback doesn't change any of that. In short, your position on this is bullshit. I'm the "resident asshole"? There's got to be a better description than that.
-
Past is no longer prologue in college sports, and that shouldn't have to be explained. Your argument is dated and wrong. Ohio State was seeded 8th last year, dude.
-
I see the discussion about BYU and I just don't see those guys closing out 11-1. They look like a team with at least another loss in them, maybe two.
-
If I gave the impression that I didn't understand where the dialog was coming from, and what the numbers are, I apologize. I was more commenting on what I actually believe about this team, which is that they're going to wind up 8-4 or 7-5 based on what I've seen up to now. You will be able to knock me over with a feather if Texas beats UGA. They should beat Arkansas and I think ATM is a paper tiger, but this team and this staff's performance this year gives me a lot of pause. Look at you, even you are optimistic to some degree. I'm starting to feel like I need to post a reverse jinx thread of some sort. My problem with the UGA front 4 performance is that they weren't putting up great numbers ahead of the game last year and then they lit Texas up. I hope the front 4 really is as weak as they've looked. Obviously the LBs are just about as good as anyone's, and that's the strength of their D. I wonder how much they're going to be used in blitz packages. I assume a lot. This game might close the book for me on Sarkisian. If he trots out another shitty gameplan when there are obvious routes otherwise for fielding a competitive outcome, I'm just going to assume that's what he's going to do every time Texas plays anyone formidable on defense, and begin cheering him on to his exit for one of the NFL roles he's rumored to be pursuing.
-
Boy, the playoff scenario discussions coupled with the SEC CG scenario discussions are just running rampant on this board. It's somewhat fascinating to see. I hope the optimism is warranted. I guess I'm stuck in neutral with this team. I can't figure out if I think they've turned a corner or not. The first 7.75 games are lodged front in center in my brain for me when I think about this team. I'm still expecting a blowout at the hands of Georgia this weekend. Just thinking about being 0-5 against UGA and OSU over the last 13 months makes me want to vomit. Anywho ... certainly wanting you guys to be right that we're back, baby.
-
UCLA's return to dominance no longer featuring DeShaun Foster
closetojumping replied to satyanash's topic in Football
Not trying to be a dick, but why on earth would Fisch leave UW for UCLA? -
Games I wish we would schedule, solely for the road trip
closetojumping replied to hornian's topic in Football
Boston College for sure. Give me more to the north and the east. Pitt for sure. I wouldn’t mind Rutgers, although others bitch about that past trip. Syracuse? Of course, UW. No thanks regarding Autzen. Those tickets would be complete ridiculous. Stanford sure, Cal no. Wisconsin would be awesome. I actually think many of the Big 10 midwest options would get me interested outside of Michigan State. Tulane, Colorado schools, Utah, sure. Miami would be kind of wild, I think. I would love for Texas to pick up a Dublin game against anyone but Notre Dame. Dublin is one of the best cities I’ve visited over the years and everyone would love it. Playing ND there? It’s a fucking home game for Notre Dame. It would be population of Ireland against the state of Texas to those drunk lunatics.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... COOKIE MONSTER!