Jump to content

Mikey4

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    1385
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

2283 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

2781 profile views
  1. So far, we're sending unwanted players into the portal. I haven't heard of any executions as of yet.
  2. Not getting the Taffe hate. His elite athleticism and instincts are unmatched. Just watch how quickly he closes here at 2:22. That's what we need.
  3. My only gripe with this is that deep coverage busts happen in real games, and too often our QBs (between Colt and Quinn) didn't see it or, if they did, missed the throw. Arch saw it immediately and found the receiver. If he can do that a couple of times in a season, those are free points.
  4. Right. You made it sound like anyone reading the reoort to say that Sweat fled the scene has a reading comprehension problem. My point is that the report is not clear. The only name listed is Sweat. Beside offenses, it states DWI and leaving the scene. A reasonable inference is that Sweat was charged with both. I take your point at the inference may be incorrect, but it is not a crazy way to read the report.
  5. Look at post #314. It’s at least confusing.
  6. Or, how about we don't call a woman a cunt on any board. Jesus Christ.
  7. As a white male, I'm fine with this. When AI becomes sentient in 5 years and sets out to destroy humanity, I will be happy it thinks I don't exist.
  8. Lol, someone solves the deepest riddles of physics, and chooses Surlyhorns.com as the place to announce his findings, and you want to run him out of town. Smh.
  9. Finished Green Mile. I liked it, though it took way too long to get into the story. Started Salems Lot over the weekend. Enjoying it so far.
  10. They're an utter embarrassment to the state is what they are.
  11. It depends on the kind of bar. The kind with alcohol should be off limits to minors. But kids should have access to crowbars for gang brawls and the like.
  12. I'm fine with that. 100% agree. The bar should be very high. But there should be a bar.
  13. The parent has a constitutional right to own a gun. If the law makes a parent strictly liable when a child uses the parent's gun in a crime, then by definition the parent is liable even if the parent is without fault. In other words, the parent is liable even though the only relevant parental conduct is owning the gun -- the very thing that the Second Amendment protects.
  14. Yeah, that's exactly it. I'm uncomfortable making a categorical rule rather than evaluating each case on its facts...even though I know that evaluating each case on its facts would lead to liability in virtually every case. Your approach is more practical and efficient, while mine leaves room for parents to escape liability in exceptional cases 🤷‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...