Regarding the names in the files that each political party wishes to keep out of the public eye, what do you think is going to be seen in the files? Does anyone think there will be a memo that says "Jim Smith, CEO of Whatever, is on video engaging in sex with what appears to be a minor, named XXX XXXXXXX, who was then located and interviewed and we confirmed she was 16 and there against her will. Jim Smith donated $$$$$ to these 15 Senators and these 3 Presidents over the last two decades." Do you think that's what's in the files and nothing was done?
What if it's "Jim Smith, CEO of Whatever, is shown in a photograph with Epstein on his island and is on the flight logs on this date." What's being done now because "we all know if you're on the island you're a pedophile?" Beyond a reasonable doubt is a pretty high burden of proof with no witnesses testifying Jim Smith did anything inappropriate. If the report continues "Jim Smith was interviewed and advised Whatever was working on a deal with Epstein, who invited him to the island and the Whatever Board recommended Jim Smith make the trip in an effort to close the deal." Do you think Jim Smith is getting prosecuted for anything?
How many names are in the files of just people who attended a party at Epstein's because it's big wig NYC scene? Bill Robinson who was the Junior VP of Lending was sent to the party by his higher ups and he never actually met Epstein, but now Bill Robinson is a child predator? Has anyone read the "files released" by the administration that proves beyond doubt that Obama committed treason? Did you read that and think, "yep, that's treason" or maybe more likely "wtf, that doesn't prove anything." If somehow the complete Epstein files are released people will see what they want, as always. Their team's guy is named in the files so he's a child rapist, but my team's guy named in there has a reasonable explanation and isn't a child rapist.