Jump to content

Dbeasy

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    12666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dbeasy

  1. Started watching it at the suggestion of my BIL. I’m 20 minutes in to episode one and I just don’t get it at all. And I feel terrible because I see all the great reactions here and the high ratings on Rotten Tomatoes. Why aren’t I getting it?
  2. So I reconfigured our setup as a result of my LG TV not performing well with streaming apps. I now use Roku for all streaming apps I’ve also connected an OTA antenna that ties into my house cable runs. Pretty good. Now I need to add a dvr for the OTA.
  3. Sorry. My bad.
  4. I know there’s been a lot of discussion about how to grow the site users, and also bring in more youth. I just want to reiterate again that if a person doesn’t have an account and isn’t logged into the site, the site is basically aids. All of the popup ads make it completely unusable. I just wonder how many new users, and especially young users, take one look at the ad infested site and just keep on going. Is there any way to make the ads less annoying? They are a beat down.
  5. Wow, would Texas get in under that scenario? Maybe yes over Georgia?
  6. I personally think some of y’all are smoking crack if you think a 9-3 Texas gets in as the 5th sec team, unless a whole lotta losing happens with several other teams. The Texas haters on the playoff committee will relish knocking Texas out. The SEC haters will not stand for 5 teams. The close lucky wins over Kentucky and MSU hurt. The fade against Vanderbilt hurts, because many only saw the score, not the game, due to the espn outage. As I sat here and thought about scenarios of who has to win or lose, I realized I probably don’t even care much about 9-3 Texas getting in because that means they lost to Aggie or Georgia, which means they aren’t good enough anyway to win in the playoffs. So I’ve decided they will go 10-2.
  7. Finomenal post. Fantastic.
  8. I’ve pretty much concluded someone on that ref team is on the take.
  9. It’s actually a useful good thread. I’m just effing with you.
  10. Thought about him. Wasn’t he a little bigger and more of a power back? So long ago I can’t remember. edit: how about Hodges Mitchell?
  11. Kids, this is what we call premature ejaculation. Settle down. A long way to go.
  12. Yep. Incredible heart. And I really can’t compare him to other previous Texas RB’s. Several have been mentioned, but he’s just different. He’s not a jitterbug like Fozzy. He’s not bigger with straight line push like Og. He’s not Malcom Brown. He’s not any of our top tier guys (Charles, etc).I don’t remember Samuels very much. Maybe Victor Ike? Nah. But at the end of the day, he’s shifty, he runs hard, he finds holes, he avoids direct contact, but when it’s unavoidable he punishes. I love the guy.
  13. #sarkreaddbeasyssurlypostaboutusingslantsandbuttonhookstomakearchmoresuccessful
  14. If anyone has one damn bad word about Arch’s performance today they should be banned for a week. He was NFL quality good. And, the OL was decent.
  15. The problem is that outside of Taaffe, our safeties are not exactly rocket scientists. They are quick and athletic but just aren’t processing fast enough.
  16. The number of uncalled holding penalties on the vandy OL was shocking.
  17. This guy doesn't have moxie. He has a tiny dick.
  18. Little man syndrome from a punk ass bitch.
  19. Wtf dude. Did you not watch the replay. What a stupid take. Pavia is a little bitch.
  20. Take that Arch haters.
  21. Well actually right in stride.
  22. Arch hit him right in stride.
  23. Sark on espn says they will go back to more tempo on offense. He had been slowing things down and relying on defense. I think that’s a good idea. Whenever a college team tries to shrink the game with fewer possessions and slower pace, they open themselves up more to upsets. A few plays going the wrong way makes games much closer than they should be given the talent differential. Tressel at OSU used to have that problem.
×
×
  • Create New...