Jump to content

DanRydell

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DanRydell

  1. bigbrotherNSFW on Reddit
  2. Good question. That house is in Waco ISD per MCAD.
  3. Some it does block. Others it just warns you about. You can also manually block a number in the app if the same one is calling repeatedly.
  4. Call Protect does catch a decent amount of spam but it doesn’t really stop the ones that are spoofing your area code and prefix.
  5. Presumably they don’t sign Hosmer unless they believe they’re already on the other side of their rebuild. Their big prospects (Tatis, Urias, Gore, Baez) should all be up before Hand’s current deal expires. Kyle Tucker also doesn’t seem a crazy demand for 3.5 years of Hand when three months of Chapman fetched Gleyber Torres.
  6. Why should they be antsy to move him? He’s on a team friendly contract through 2021.
  7. That wouldn’t seem to work for shit since 99% of the spam calls I get (basically everything other than political fundraising calls) are ghosting not only my area code but my prefix.
  8. And yet RPM, the prosecutors and the jury seemed to find that to be the most compelling piece of evidence there was.
  9. Personally, I've seen hundreds of people grieve but I have never witnessed two people grieve in identical ways. But unlike you, I don't hold myself out as an expert but rather as a skeptic. I'm open to considering someone's behavior in determining their guilt but you need to show some damn compelling scientific studies to support that. That you're willing to kill her based on your two prior experiences makes you every bit the sociopath you believe she is.
  10. You made it about you by citing your experience as evidence. And sorry, your sample size of two to determine what every mother in the world would do is far from compelling.
  11. How many times exactly have you been with a mother on her deceased child's first birthday after the child's death?
  12. Yes, they showed the video. I can't fathom how that was admissible but it certainly isn't evidence of guilt.
  13. They made a big deal about the lack of footprints in the mulch but the window with the cut screen opened onto a concrete patio so that didn't make a lick of sense as one would more naturally walk around the mulch than through it. Unless I missed it, they couldn't really draw any conclusions about which side the screen was cut from. The evidence that she did it was that one of the knives in the family knife block had chemical components on the blade that were consistent with the screen. Problem with that evidence is that both the screen and the knife were dusted for prints and because the crime scene investigators were sloppy and didn't really record what they were doing, the particles could have been transferred by the fingerprint brush. I'm not prepared to say she's innocent but I'm certainly not confident of her guilt.
  14. I'm curious why you're so dismissive of that. I'd never heard of the case before this but I've been watching the show on ABC and the prosecutor's case is a mixture of bad forensics and that she had fake tits, that she didn't grieve in the manner they thought was appropriate, and that she wanted $10k in life insurance (despite spending over $10k on the kids' funerals). And this isn't a show where the state isn't being able to present their arguments. The two prosecutors are featured heavily.
  15. One can be Catholic and believe the state and the church should be able to define marriage differently.
  16. I’d prefer if the hot Aggie stuck around a bit but otherwise they all fucking suck.
  17. Yeah, but then they'll just make a lame duck appointment if they lose.
  18. The GOP has had insane SCOTUS luck over the last 50 years. In 32 years in the White House (by the end of Trump's first term), they will have appointed at least 14 justices. In 20 years in the White House over that same time, Democratic Presidents have made four. Since 1963, the Bush family alone has appointed as many SCOTUS justices as Democratic Presidents.
  19. A runner running to second base who doesn't slide 45 feet from the bag is neither sliding nor running away from the fielder.
  20. What part of the rule says it only applies where he's much of an obstruction?
  21. Y'all are fucking insane. So if it was a direct shot to 2B and the baserunner was only halfway down the baseline, you think the runner needs to slide into the ground 45 feet from the bag? That's absurd. Taking this rule that literally would mean that players are required to slide into first base.
×
×
  • Create New...