I did a search in that article for the word "woke."
You're applying the notion that allows you to hate to your vision of whatever you think reality is.
I have profound objections to grad student thesis/dissertation tyranny over the language. I'm sure one of them came up with the notion of "able-ism." They represent a third party of naive, ivory tower dullards believing they are making a better society by protecting people they never talk to.
Retard, a word I love for comedy, is clearly derogatory and hurtful. I'm not sure that "mentally retarded" is offensive or was offensive until the language overlords stepped in. They give us Individual with Developmental Deficiencies which is awkward grad speak. Did anybody bother to talk to that community?
That evidently happened with Latinx which came and went under my radar.
So yeah, I see a problem with do gooder grad students presuming to explain the world to me. It's not some horrible Wokie crime of the type that seems to get your bowels in an uproar.
No intellectually balanced person could conclude from your link anything about being woke. You tried to pull Rush Limbaugh by somehow thinking you justified this bit of hysteria:
By accusing a generation of virulent fascism, you show a pitiful imbalance. It's obvious to everyone but you and your fellow travellers, but I'll say it anyway, irony-deafness is a pretty good tell that you're talking to an Aggie, a Rush Limbaugh worshipper, or a Trumper.
You sorta lied by saying your link had something to do with defining a wokie party full of evil doers.
I won't neg you because it's all so pathetic.
Thanks for wrecking my republic. Don't fall out of any windows!