See, that's the funny thing - they're not even on the opposite side of the side that Ana CLAIMS to be on (look to the science!) Both of them very much support evidence-based reasoning to reach the right outcome. Neither one of them is claiming that it's a "settled issue!" like Ana seems to be, though. There is data, evidence, and information that can both support hormonal treatment of gender dysphoria, and to find that it is harmful and/or should be delayed for minors, as well as myriad other nuanced conclusions. I think most people above would take the position that someone claiming "it's settled! Any kid who claims to be trans should be given easy access to hormones!" would be an extremist, and is taking a shitty, non-nuanced position. Those same people also think that "it's settled! Ban all hormone treatments for anyone with gender dysphoria!/and certainly don't allow them for any minors, even with parental consent and pursuant to medical advice!" is an extremist, non-nuanced position.
It's a challenging issue for anyone to deal with. No matter what it is, the goal of society should be to make sure the path is cleared to finding the best ways to treat/handle it. As we learn more about it and the alternatives, the information and options will change, and EVERYONE needs to be willing to go with what we're learning and new info that develops. If, for example, it turns out that we get gold-standard research that says that hormone treatment is worse than leaving it medically untreated 99% of the time, then I think most folks here would be comfortable saying "well then, the medical profession shouldn't be recommending that course of treatment." And vice-versa.