No of course not, that's silly to make a sweeping accusation across all members of a group and from the video above I don't think he does that either. Do I think that Joy Reid, Ketanji Jackson and Sheila Jackson Lee, which were the women specifically called out, to have a "lack of brain power" and wouldn't be where they were without affirmative action, kinda? Do I think that DEI and affirmative action has resulted in people less qualified than others to gain positions of power, promotions etc. outside of those examples? Most certainly, which was the point he was making from what I could tell of the 20 second clip on the topic.
I don't think droves of black people are driving around hunting white people, no of course not. Do I think in the context of interracial murders you are more likely as a white person to be killed by a black person than vice a versa? Yes - and the facts bear that out. You can call the droves statement a lie if you want and I won't fight you, but there are some truths wrapped up in that discussion that you dont get in a 5 second clip. Do I think it warrants him being shot in the neck, or people dismissing his death as good riddance, nope. I bet it sure does give permission for a ton of talking heads to just start blanketly labeling him as a racist though.
On the abortion/holocaust comment - he's making a numerical comparison - so by the numbers he is right. I (and I would assume millions of others) really don't think he is meaning to diminish the atrocities of the holocaust and if you were being intellectually honest, you don't think he is excusing or diminishing the holocaust either.
Do I think all women should submit to men, no. Do I think married women should submit to their husbands? That is the teaching of the new testament; but if you met my wife, you would know she doesn't submit in any form or fashion to me and I dont ask it of her. Would we have better marriages if that were the case, maybe, maybe not? I don't know.
My point to all of this was not MY opinion on these statements, it was that I think context and background matters. As much as conservatives pounce on parroting talking points or name calling or shallow analysis of complex issues, I think a lot of people blanketly stating that Charlie Kirk was a hateful, racist, misogynist, transphobe etc. should probably be scaled back a bit. Dollars to doughnuts, many of these people have not thought through his perspectives/ideologies with an open mind and are just parroting opinions from others that want to shut down someone they don't like or see eye to eye with.