Jump to content

Enchubben

Full Members
  • Posts

    4379
  • Joined

Everything posted by Enchubben

  1. No? Is that an evidenced reoccurring issue with verified sources/reporting? Doesn’t seem like it. Do I believe there are isolated cases of people impersonating ICE or other law enforcement to break the law? Most certainly, and those people are criminals and should punished accordingly. People have been impersonating police to commit crimes for decades. You want to round those people up for imprisonment or worse, I’ll get in line to help. I don’t know much about proud boys, but just so you know, when you use the term Nazi in any unverified claim or question/statement, reasonable people will generally tune you out. If you want to have a healthy discussion on facts and issues, I’d leave out the hyperbole. It’s akin to me calling all liberals communists; it’s disingenuous and lazy.
  2. You're trying to start an argument or create a disagreement where there isn't one. The point was these are elected officials that have no business representing large swaths of americans. Hope that helps.
  3. survey says yes, bob. In the day and age of being shot for your beliefs/statements etc.; highly suggest she start wearing body armor. Not a fan of either of them btw and it's absurd that these two are supposed representatives of the everyday American.
  4. I’m guessing they did something separately small and private for family. In any case, I don’t blame them for not wanting to speak in public after watching their son/sibling/friend assassinated in a large public setting.
  5. there is that tolerant left again. proud of you for getting your fee fees out big guy.
  6. I'm saying there are slots based on merit. Are you serious about making the claim that there are not companies out here specifically with quotas for certain races, genders etc.? Shit man the company I work for has whole ass dashboards where its tracked and then are judged on it at end of year. Literally our comp is impacted by how many non-white men are hired and promoted.
  7. I don’t think I’m pursuing a reaction as much as I’d like to open the eyes of this liberal echo chamber to some truths. I don’t think I’ll be changing people’s views and opinions, this forum is far too left for that. In any case, I slept just fine last night, with no hate or anger for any one of you. I hope you all can say the same.
  8. Damn dude! Thats impressive. You’ve seen 6 internet posts and know me so well. Impressive.
  9. I hope you have a good evening. God bless you.
  10. He was speaking in a broader discussion about border security, enforcement, and what force might be used. That includes non-lethal force (rubber bullets, tear gas), escalation to lethal force, etc. So yes, you still missed the context and grabbed one sentence from a much longer discussion on border security.
  11. You either lack the ability to process a conversation and understand context or have not spent any time at all listening to the man other than 2-3 sentences that fit your desired narrative. His whole argument, which is substantiated over and over again in public recorded settings, is that we shouldn't be seeing race when we evaluate human beings. Policies in place that require X% of people being a certain race/gender etc. run counter to that and results in people considering, was this the best person for the job, or were they placed there because of a forced metric. That is not helpful to or productive for anybody and its wild to me that you can't see the difference between opening doors for people and guaranteeing equal results. Charlie wanted to be able to trust that the "pilot", black or white, was the best pilot for the job. Or you can just parrot a complete fabrication of what he actually said and convince yourself that he said black people bad. You do you.
  12. I'm responding to you Only so much time in a day, and frankly most of the responses i get are the exact same and aren't really indicative of people wanting to have a conversation as much as they are interested in making flawed judgements of my character and childish name calling.
  13. Yikes. I’ll say this, kudos for owning up to your racist, sexist ideologies. Compare and contrast to Charlie’s views on race:
  14. Just to be clear because I haven’t seen this before, Kirk was a racist because he disagrees with DEI initiatives and said SJL was an idiot. (which she was). But openly suggesting to remove all white men from government based on their gender and skin color is a-ok?
  15. I got tired of seeing people post hateful comments about a man who was shot in the neck in front of his wife and kids with little to no actual knowledge about his beliefs. You are entitled to your opinion about his ideologies, and I don’t hate you for having them.
  16. I’ll tell you when you spill the beans about how much you contributed to the Tyler Robinson legal defense fund.
  17. 💯 I simply started posting on this topic because there were a lot of people espousing insults and accusations against the man that simply aren’t true with nothing to back it up other than more insults and name calling. When questioned, I am told the same of myself and to stop posting.
  18. This is correct. There was plenty to be excited about with strong at the time he was hired. It was as soon as his assistant coaches were hired that most knew we were cooked.
  19. I’ll repeat it for you, I don’t think race, sex orientation religion etc should be used in performance evaluation or hiring decisions. If you want to die on that hill by all means, continue to do so. I do have to ask though, does this mean you’re not coming to my birthday party?
  20. If a proper DEI strategy was in place like the one you described (where it was meant to increase the initial pool of candidates) I don’t think most people would have a complaint here. Thats not what happens in the real world, because the natural next step is to track “progress” which means hires of those candidates based on predetermined goals or quotas. What follows is incentivizing people based on hiring those with that criteria, then punishment of those that don’t. Again, I’m sure this isn’t everywhere, but this is my experience exactly, and I don’t think I’m alone. I’d revert back to my initial point, which was Charlie’s arguments we’re never we don’t need black people in the workforce because they don’t have brain power. He wasn’t racist, and calling him that is cheap and lazy at best. I bet I would find something similar in what many find to be his most “deplorable” quotes or statements. People hated him because their algorithm and social media circle told them to hate him, not because he was actually a bad person.
  21. If you got some, I’ll take a case!
  22. Honestly it’s so damn all over the place and still evolving, so I’m not sure what the hell it means anymore. In the context of my statements I consider a DEI hire to be someone who was given a job/promotion etc. solely, or in part because of an alignment with an underrepresented class (gender, color, orientation etc) at the expense of a more qualified candidate based on the job profile.
  23. I think the statement went straight over your head. Yes intraracial murder is more common than interracial murders, and by a large margin. When considering black on white or white on black murders, it skews heavily towards black on white.
×
×
  • Create New...