Jump to content

lilMAC25

Full Members
  • Posts

    4848
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lilMAC25

  1. And Aggy stopped them. what did Sark’s team do? get fucking wrecked repeatedly. your trying to gloss over that is… delusional
  2. It’s Points Scored, not Offensive Points Scored, so yeah. (this came off as snarky on reread/edit, and I didn’t mean it to sound that way at all)
  3. Listen, I want Banks fired too, but as much as he’s responsible for the shit play at TE and on ST… he’s also responsible for NNIIIIBBBLLLLEESSS
  4. What was their score vs Florida?
  5. I do NOT agree with your Sarkisian hiring assessment at all. Dude was a failure in multiple ways at previous Head Coaching stops. He was in no way choice #1 at the time. Texas took a big swing at Urban Meyer and struck out. Then we were left scrambling trying to find a candidate and “traded one addict for another”.
  6. This is a dumb post, brother. The fucking massive contractual buyout, the embarrassment of having to can him for what he was already canned for in the past and the questions of “you knew what he was when you hired him, why did you hire him?”, the comparisons to the previous HC and his cocaine fueled orgies that were partially responsible for his firing, his success the last two seasons, putting players in the pros, his success recruiting There are probably hundreds more reasons…
  7. Try using that logic with your wife. It isn’t a denial.
  8. He was angry with the lady who reported it, but he didn’t really deny the truth of the report.
  9. Did he though? His AGENT did, but I didn’t hear Sark deny it.
  10. There might be cocaine left on those earrings from when her and Herman were having their drug fueled orgies.
  11. Newborns completely disrupt life. I can’t imagine dealing with one at 47, and I’m not running TexasFootball
  12. Eh, he’s already had one open heart surgery… adding in a vasectomy increases his chances of a prootamine reaction…. yeah, that’s what it is
  13. I mean, it might be. maybe they had breakup sex and Sark’s swimmers hit their target. It happens…
  14. I was trying to come up with a similar line, but this is much better than whatever I was planning. I hope like crazy he proves everyone wrong. That would be amazing.
  15. I mean, I stated it that way for a reason. It doesn’t ONLY apply to sexual satisfaction. Hell, I’d guess MOST affairs that married/“monogamous” women participate in start off due to lack of relational fulfillment (or perceived lack thereof relative to what the seducer is offering) as opposed to sexual satisfaction. what the hell do I know though?
  16. Because it’s often seen as proof that a man cannot satisfy the woman he loves.
  17. I’m quite amused that you’re arguing with Miriam-Webster here. You’re saying that your porn derived definition is the ONLY definition. I’m giving you the CURRENT ONLINE defintion according to MW. (Along with a link to that definition). shit, here is the CAMBRIDGE ENGLISH DICTIONARY DEFINITION https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/cuckold a man whose partner has a sexual relationshipwith someone else: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/cuckold take it up with those guys. 🤷🏼‍♂️
  18. I don’t have any pics of his wife. I want a grilled cheese now. Mayo instead of butter, right?
  19. He might want to know if his woman can smoke your pole…. 🤷🏼‍♂️
  20. FIFY. It’s a term still in use by (checks calendar) 47 yr olds like me. Then again, I have a reasonable vocabulary (though I’m not really well read in the classical sense) Now THAT is funny.
×
×
  • Create New...