Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    19690
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. The same people blaming Akina today were blaming Gideon in 2023. We've seen this playout with PK's defense twice now. When the linebackers and secondary are young/inexperienced, there are a lot of holes and coverage busts. Once we get them trained up, those go away. I think we ask our defenders to do a lot in terms of understanding the overall defense. That leads to hesitation and mistakes early on. But when players get it, it works really well and creates a very flexible and capable defense. And the hate of Akina is ridiculous generally. Using the fact that he has consistently put DBs into the NFL against him is crazy. He clearly knows how to teach the position, although with a specialty in man-coverage. We probably could and should have run more man coverage against Vanderbilt at the end. But I think we put a lot on emphasis on players learning during a game. And if they don't rep it in a live game, they don't get the experience necessary to learn what to do and what not to do.
  2. McCutcheon did. I don't think Filsaime did. He went out on the 4th and 19 play. Even if he had recovered enough to play, I'm not sure how he would have time to get back out there.
  3. Baxter just hasn't been effective this year. He goes down instantly.
  4. Ian or Sark?
  5. Disney seems to be forgetting that part of the advantage of its deal with the bundled providers is that it gets money for a lot of subscribers that aren't interested in the sports content. It'll need to have more than 6x its current ESPN/Disney subscriber base to get the same revenue at anywhere near its current prices. I honestly don't think that is terribly realistic.
  6. Yeah, the announcers being completely clueless, and the replay cutting off was absolutely wild at the time.
  7. Whatever you say.
  8. I am a lawyer. I gave you the picture and the video. It isn't possible for the ball to have crossed. That's just how the world works. I'd walk it through you in slow motion if you were on the stand. The sky view is conclusive that the ball is moving forward until after it crosses in the front of the pylon.
  9. Idiots can dispute anything. The ball is moving forward until after it crosses the pylon. It never touches the pylon. What it does after that is irrelevant. To a reasonable and objective observer, the video evidence is conclusive that it did not cross the goal line.
  10. Doesn't happen. Watch the overhead video. The ball is moving forward right up until the player lands out of bounds.
  11. (1) no, he didn't, and (2) because I can watch the video and see the ball is always moving forward up until he falls out of bounds. Here is when he started to stretch: Ball still moving forward: Still moving forward and crossing in front of the pylon: You can see the same from the other angle, the ball keeps moving forward as he stretches right up until it crosses in front of the pylon. Here is the moment it starts to cross: And one moment later it has crossed and you can see it is ever so slightly closer, but still not past the pylon (which we know because it didn't touch it):
  12. I'm assuming DJ Campbell is still a bit banged up.
  13. The angle doesn't fucking matter. The ball crossed at the pylon. It either touched it or it didn't. The pylon is the very edge of the goal line. If it didn't touch the pylon, it didn't break the goal line.
  14. The replay was undisputable. The ball crossed right in front of the pylon at the absolute closet point it got to the goal line. There is no reason to look at any angles or any other frame. If it had touched the pylon, you'd have to look at whether the player was inbounds. Since it didn't, it should have been an obvious overturn. We don't need to guess whether a lace could have been over the line at some prior point. We know it wasn't because it didn't touch the pylon. It is just how the physics of our world works.
  15. No, it didn't. The closest the ball was at the pylon. It didn't touch the pylon, therefore it never crossed at anytime before that.
  16. Ok state....
  17. Wow. That is a fucked up question at the end.
  18. It was literally the best case scenario for having definitive evidence. We watch the ball at its absolutely closest point to the end zone pass in front of the pylon. If it doesn't touch there, it doesn't touch anywhere else. Either the review officials were crooked or fucking idiots.
  19. No. The closest the ball came was at the end. And we literally saw it not touch the pylon (the edge of the endzone). There is no doubt that ball did not cross. The evidence of that is conclusive angles don't change shit.
  20. I'm confident our early season offense couldn't score 70 on anyone..
  21. It was definitely ok state level of fuckery. I'm still in shock about the 2-point "conversion"
  22. Offense played fine. Refs were bad. Defense fell apart, particularly once Filasamee got hurt. This is different if we have any of our actual safeties playing.
  23. While this apparently the year for it, it would be a bad time to be in the market. I also don't see Tennessee getting anyone better.
  24. can't drop that
  25. I guess not scoring there makes sense except Tenn has 2 timeouts.
×
×
  • Create New...