Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    18040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. Arch was bad, full stop. No game plan was going to make his play today anything but terrible. That's just the way it is. Sark's game plan probably wasn't the best. But if Arch makes the easy throws, we win.
  2. Ok, by why didn't Sark call more plays to Arch's strength, like simple roll outs that cut the field in half and give him a wide open throw? Oh wait...
  3. Yes, last year Texas played a much better Ohio State team. They could stop the run easily (and I think our run game is going to be pretty good this year). More of the game was on Ewers as a result, and against a better defense, he wasn't good enough to get it done. Again, this is a stupid post. Sark his issues in the redzone. But that wasn't the primary problem today. It was a problem, to be sure. But it wasn't the primary problem. Quinn wins today fairly easily. Hudson Card probably wins today. Swoopes probably wins today. Arch played a no good, very bad, terrible game today. That's just how it is. He'll be better (I hope).
  4. Uh, so you don't think Quinn would have beat Ohio State last year if the defense held them to 203 total yards and our team was able to run for 166 yards at 4.5 a pop? Again, it isn't the same teams. This is a stupid post.
  5. Sark has his weaknesses. But your post is nonsense. We didn't see Quinn against this OSU team with this Texas team. OSU isn't the same team as last year. There were more plays to be made against that defense this year. Given that clean of a pocket, Quinn would have cooked today. I get you want to bash Sark. But your analysis here is bad. And I think you know it.
  6. OSU played good defense. But the receivers got open and Arch missed them. They weren't consistently open, but they were a lot of plays to be made that Arch missed, badly.
  7. It is accurate. It may actually under count his misses.
  8. Ewers would have won today too. It would have looked a lot like his Alabama game. Sark had problems with Ewers, but he didn't have the same problems. You're a hammer and everything looks like a nail to you right now. While, redzone play calling is an issue, it wasn't the primary issue today. I guarantee if you just watch all of Arch's throws back-to-back-to-back, you'll agree. He was the problem today. And that's ok. I think he'll get better.
  9. Yup. His internal clock was rushed on everything.
  10. Arch's issue weren't about the redzone. They were about his inability to throw the ball anywhere near his receiver. We win going away with Sayin. I'm sorry you're in denial. Whether Sark should have schemed the game differently or not is irrelevant. As schemed, it was winnable if the QB play is even halfway to competent.
  11. Sark can't throw the ball for him. This wasn't a loss because, for instance, Ohio State blitzed a shit ton and collapsed the pocket. There was generally a very good pocket for Arch to throw from. This wasn't a loss because we couldn't run the ball. We actually ran quite effectively. This wasn't a loss because we didn't call shots to open receivers. We did. This isn't a loss because we didn't call the TD on 3rd and 5 in a 1 score game. We did. It is a loss because our QB couldn't execute shit. Sayin as our QB and the this game is a blowout for Texas. That's the truth.
  12. Of course we were. Tom Brady hits Wingo crossing wide open for a probably touch down to tie the game. Tom Brady hits Moore on the first play for a huge explosive. Tom Brady Doesn't underthrow Wingo by 10 yards causing an INT. The game plan was good enough to win. The execution by one player was not.
  13. I assume it is just when the throw wasn't catchable by the intended receiver. He had other incompletions that were technically catchable but either defended or dropped (I use dropped loosely as it is really more that the receiver didn't make an incredible catch). I definitely believe he had 11 throws that weren't catchable by the receiver. I also think he had another 5 or 6 that were caught, but off target enough to make the play much less effective (e.g., the caught little bubble screen that lost yardage).
  14. BECAUSE HE SUCKED AT EVERYHTING (for today)! Again, your insistence that something else must have worked better despite all the evidence that he couldn't even do the very simplest things you expect a QB to do is just befuddling. I'm all for playing to the strengths of a player. I don't think that was the problem today. I think the problem was a player that we hope will be very good was in fact very, very very very very very bad.
  15. Yeah, our oline played much better than I expected. That's part of why I'm so disappointed in Arch's performance. He wasn't having to run for his life. He wasn't being rushed on his throws. He just fucking couldn't hit any of them. It looks like once he decided to throw, he rushed throw the motion rather than just focus on making a clean throw. That's where all that side arm shit came from.
  16. He had no strengths today. He couldn't execute anything consistently. Your continued insistence that we should call to his non-existent strengths (for today) is stupefying.
  17. We can agree that there are 12 years old that would have played a better game at QB.
  18. This is wrong. Really really wrong.
  19. Yes and I understand that you're delusional right now. I'm hoping you break out of it.
  20. He wasn't good at anything today. We tried a ton of shit with him. He sucked at it. I'm sorry that hurts your feelings. But it is true. There wasn't a game plan fix for Manning playing like absolute dog shit. His level of play today would keep the next 3 games somewhat close instead of being the absolute beat downs they should be. I'm confident he'll figure it out. But today isn't the day to blame anything but Arch.
  21. Arch attempting a slant in the middle of field today would have been a sure fire pick 6.
  22. Here is what I can tell everyone. As bad as you remember Arch being today, I can guarantee you it was actually much worse.
  23. You're correct. Your friend must have had a lobotomy or be @hobbes2702
  24. We ran the ball fairly well. Arch couldn't execute anything, ever. It didn't matter the play call. Stop being dense.
  25. My guy, everything you've said has been wrong and continues to be wrong. We called multiple QB draws. They were ok. Definitely the best part of his game because the rest of it was absolute trash. Throwing the ball successfully wasn't an option given what Arch was doing.
×
×
  • Create New...